SHARE
COPY LINK

LARS OHLY

Lars Ohly: Seven years at the helm of Sweden’s Left Party

Lars Ohly announced on Tuesday that he is to step down as leader of Sweden's Left Party. While widely respected as a person and as a skilful debater, his tenure will be remembered more for his stance on Communism and electoral decline.

Lars Ohly: Seven years at the helm of Sweden's Left Party

The Left Party will thus become the last of the three Red-Green opposition parties to appoint a new leader following their crushing defeat at the 2010 general election.

Lars Ohly was elected in 2004 as a long term successor to Gudrun Schyman, who went on to form and lead the Feminist Initiative.

Filling the charismatic Schyman’s shoes proved a tough task however for Ohly and the Left Party under his stewardship was never able to get close to the record highs of the late nineties, forged on a programme of radical socialism and feminism.

Indeed not only was the Left Party unable to regain its status as Sweden’s third largest party, achieved with over 12 percent of the vote in the 1998 election, an aura of ideological stagnation returned to characterise much of the party’s electoral performance during the 2000s.

Lars Ohly, who was elected as leader with the support of the traditionalist wing of the party, is perhaps best known for his refusal to moderate his definition of himself as a Communist.

“It served to give a gifted leader an aura of the 1950s and made people think of the Soviet Union instead of left socialism,” SVT journalist K-G Bergström wrote in the Expressen daily following Ohly’s announcement.

Ohly, who is widely regarded across the political spectrum as an amiable man and skilful debater, claimed on Tuesday that his greatest success was to leave a party more united that when he found it.

In reality this unity can be attributed to the fact that Gudrun Schyman’s supporters no longer felt at home in the party. Several of these less revolutionary socialist and more reform-minded Left Party members formed “Vägval Vänster” – an association often critical of Ohly and seeking to offer an alternative to his brand of socialism.

The difficulty of integrating the Left Party into a dynamic centre-left coalition to challenge the 2010 election was illustrated in 2008 when the party pulled out of talks with the Social Democrats and Green Party over differences on economic policy.

The Left Party later rejoined the Red-Green coalition but after Sweden’s voters passed judgement at the 2010 election, the project was swiftly discarded.

Lars Ohly recognised on Tuesday that political leaders are measured by their election results and after polling 5.6 percent in the 2010 election, the party’s poorest showing since the crisis years of 1991, internal opposition began to grow.

While as late as June 2011 Ohly pledged to fight on as leader, the pressure ultimately became too much and the keen football supporter and former train conductor decided to call time on his tenure.

Ohly has said that he plans to continue to sit in parliament for the Left Party and to cooperate in the party’s process of revamping its political programme.

Three candidates – Jonas Sjöstedt, Ulla Andersson and Hans Linde – have to date put their names forward to take over the leadership. Some party members are also calling for a leadership duo along the lines of the Green Party’s man/woman team.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

Left leader calls for German referendum on EU deals

The left-wing leader of the official opposition party in Germany said that it’s time the German people also have a say on what goes on in Brussels.

Left leader calls for German referendum on EU deals
Left Party leader Sahra Wagenknecht. Photo: DPA.

Left Party (Linke) leader Sahra Wagenknecht said on Tuesday that she wants Germany to hold it’s own kind of EU referendum, specifically on trade deals like the controversial proposed TTIP free trade agreement between Europe and the United States.

“I believe that it’s right to give the people the chance to vote on important issues like the planned free trade TTIP deal, or other European agreements,” Wagenknecht told newspaper Die Welt.

“We want to change Europe so that it doesn’t fall apart further. Therefore new deals should be agreed upon in every country.”

A small catch to this, though, is that it's debatable whether the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) would allow for the launch of such a countrywide referendum.

The only kinds of federal referenda that the Grundgesetz explicitly mentions are on changes to territory, like fusing together several states.

Not including other forms of referenda in the Grundgesetz is due to the country’s weariness of its Nazi past, when referenda were used to create constitutional change to the ultimate detriment of democracy.

Wagenknecht also said that those who voice criticism of the EU are not all nationalists or against European cooperation.

“As long as people see their pensions sinking and jobs becoming more precarious because of interference from Brussels, one should not be surprised that opposition is growing,” she said.

“People should of course be able to decide for themselves what kind of Europe they want to live in. Instead of being afraid of referenda, the EU should change its policies so that people can again connect their hopes to a common Europe.”

On the other end of the political spectrum, the leader of the far-right populist AfD (Alternative for Germany) party said in reaction to the Brexit vote that “the time is ripe for a new Europe”.

AfD member of the European Parliament Beatrix von Storch also greatly praised the Brexit vote and demanded that European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and European Parliament President Martin Schulz “resign because their project has failed”.

Meanwhile Chancellor Angela Merkel has been in talks with other European leaders about the impact of the UK leaving, urging more cooperation among the remaining members.

Note: This article has been clarified to explain that it is debatable whether the Basic Law allows for certain federal referenda.

SHOW COMMENTS