SHARE
COPY LINK

DESIGN

‘Your home is too important to let it look like a rat hole’

The Local catches up with Simon Davies of the English-Swedish design duo Simon & Tomas to hear more about their upcoming American television show, and whether US homes are any uglier than homes in Sweden.

'Your home is too important to let it look like a rat hole'
Tomas Cederlund and Simon Davies

Earlier this week, UK-native Davies and Swedish sidekick Tomas Cederlund announced they were set to star in a new interior design programme to be broadcast in the United States on the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN).

The show, Home Takeover with Simon & Tomas, is set to premiere on March 28th, features the “Lords of Fabulousness” as they help US homeowners correct interior design faux pas.

In an interview with The Local, Davies explains how a Brit and a Swede ended up offering design tips in connection with one of the biggest names in television.

How long have plans for a US show been in the works?

Plans have quietly been in the making since last August but naturally lawyers were involved so things took a little time.

How did you settle on the Oprah Winfrey Network?

We came out to LA and pitched the idea to 11 networks and channels; four called us and said they were interested but OWN (Oprah Winfrey Network) which was being launched four months in advance of our meetings called us up 30 minutes after the pitch and said they wanted us, no trial show, straight to screen.

It was a fantastic opportunity as everything she touches is a huge success and to have your show promoted by OWN is really very flattering.

The programme sounds a lot like the shows you’ve had in Sweden in recent years. How have you altered the concept for a US audience?

We have tried to make the show about the culture clash between the US and Europe.

We have just arrived in Shreveport, Louisiana and on the way from being collected at the airport for a little local colour we stopped off at a drive through margarita shop. All rather eye popping.

We are also able to be much ruder to American families as I do not think they are so sensitive and we get lots of feedback.

Why do you think this concept is suited for the United States?

Right now on US TV Swedes and the English are quite hot property and in my experience Americans love the English accent. I do think Americans like to get beaten up a bit by the English…….it makes them feel less guilty about the colonies.

How would you compare “ugly” American homes to the “ugly” homes you found in Sweden? Do Swedes and Americans make the same interior design mistakes? Are ugly US homes “uglier” than ugly Swedish homes?

The most obvious ugly mistake we have found in America as that people simply stuff their homes with cuddly toys with ghastly logos on them like, “Mom, you are the best and I love you more than cookies”…….someone take me out and shoot me.

I also think US homes are much more extreme in their ugliness. Swedish homes are often ugly in their boringness and every home having all the same things, vitrinskåp (glass cabinet), plastmatta (plastic floor coverings) etc., etc.

What sort of differences did you notice in the way that Swedes and Americans think about design and reacted to your efforts?

Americans are much noisier and are prepared to show their emotions in a different way. They really give you all they have and let you know just what they think. Swedes are a little reserved with their emotions.

Was it easier to work with Swedes or with Americans? Why?

Working here is easier as we have a crew of 30 people out on site whereas in Sweden we might perhaps have 5. You have to remember that the TV and film business here is simply huge and there are always tens of thousands of people who will do anything to break into the business. As an example, after our first days filming they fired the 3 camera men—not good enough—and they were replaced by day 2. It is pretty cut throat.

Do you plan to continue producing your shows and running your stores in Sweden?

We have decided to close the store as we would like to concentrate on our private clients and we do not need a store to do that. As we source furniture for clients so each home is individual and tailored to suit the client a 600 sqaure metre showroom is no longer necessary.

Being in LA is a good example of how we would like to continue working, we find a wonderful pair of chairs that we know would suit a client so they get shipped back to Sweden, or perhaps it is a carpet, table or bureau. So long as we have a gorgeous office that reflects our style these pieces will fit in there, we want to have an office that feels like our home.

Any other projects abroad in the works?

We have a project in the Caribbean designing and building a house in traditional Caribbean style with traditional materials and a contemporary interior. I do not think two projects in Skåne (in southern Sweden) count.

Is the United States in danger of being “Ikea-ized” in the way may Swedish homes have been?

Absolutely not.

How has Swedish design affected interior design in the United States? How might your programme play a role in raising the profile of Swedish and Scandinavian design in the US?

I suspect the US will pay no attention at all and that is not the message of our show. Our whole point has always been your home is too important to let it look like a rat hole.

When you come home after a stressful day, awful boss, kids screaming, run out of milk you should think of home as a sanctuary, somewhere where you can relax, let your cares drift away and feel your batteries can re-charge.

Living in Sweden we are consumed by the Swedish model and we rarely look beyond our own borders for inspiration; Americans embrace everything and every style and make it their own and I have huge respect for that.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COURT

Adidas loses EU court battle over ‘three stripe’ design

German sportswear giant Adidas on Wednesday lost a legal battle to trademark its "three stripe" motif in the EU, as a court ruled the design was not distinctive enough to deserve protection.

Adidas loses EU court battle over 'three stripe' design
Archive photo shows an Adidas shoe. Photo: DPA

The three parallel stripes seen adorning everything from running shoes to sports bags and the sleeves of t-shirts are “an ordinary figurative mark”, the General Court of the European Union ruled.

The court, the EU's second highest tribunal, upheld a 2016 ruling by the bloc's intellectual property regulator cancelling the registration of the three-stripe design as a trademark following a challenge by a Belgian shoe 
company.

“The General Court of the EU confirms the invalidity of the Adidas EU trade mark which consists of three parallel stripes applied in any direction,” the court said in a statement.

Adidas had not proved the motif had acquired a “distinctive character” throughout the 28 countries of the bloc that would qualify for legal protection, the court said.

SEE ALSO: Shoe-Bahn: Berliners queue for sneaker with sewn-in annual transit ticket

“The mark is not a pattern mark composed of a series of regularly repetitive elements, but an ordinary figurative mark,” the court said.

The ruling is the latest round in a long legal tussle between Adidas and Belgian rival Shoe Branding Europe, which as far back as 2009 won trademark status for a two-stripe design, triggering court action from the German firm.

Adidas, which is based in the small Bavarian city of Herzogenaurach near Nuremberg, can appeal against Wednesday's decision to the European Court of Justice, the bloc's highest court. 

 

SHOW COMMENTS