SHARE
COPY LINK

SPYKER

‘Saab’s future in jeopardy’: auto expert

A prominent auto industry expert has warned that, based on current figures, Saab Automobile won’t likely survive more than three more years.

'Saab's future in jeopardy': auto expert

“You can’t survive at these levels,” Christer Karlsson, a professor of industrial production at Copenhagen Business School in Copenhagen, told the TT news agency.

At the start of 2010, Saab leadership projected the company would sell 60,000 vehicles during the year.

But after two major downward revisions, first to 45,000 in August, and then to 30,000-35,000 in October, Saab’s final result for 2010 was 32,048 vehicles sold – in line with updated projections, but just over half of what the automaker hoped to sell at the start of the year.

According to the CEO of Saab owner Spyker Cars, Victor Muller, one of last year’s greatest challenges was replenishing inventories at dealers around the world. Another reason for the low sales figures is that deliveries didn’t ramp up to desired levels until the third quarter.

According to Karlsson, Saab’s future looks bleak and there’s no way of knowing whether the company may be viable without seeing Saab’s business plan.

“But these are sustainable sales figures in the long run. You can’t survive at these levels and Saab hasn’t even reached established goals,” he said.

“Saab is making it now thanks to selling tools and the like, but in the current structure they have no way to live to see the next generation of cars.”

Karlsson warned that Saab’s future looks uncertain at best, warning it’s only a matter time until the company meets with a day of reckoning.

“In the best case, it may drag on for up to three years. But maybe two years. Saab doesn’t have the resources to develop any new generation of products; that costs several billion kronor,” said Karlsson.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

SAAB

Spyker to continue fight for GM Saab pay out

Dutch car builder Spyker on Thursday said it will appeal the dismissal of its $3.0 billion claim in a US court against General Motors, which Spyker accuses of deliberately bankrupting Sweden's Saab in 2011.

Spyker to continue fight for GM Saab pay out

“Spyker… shall appeal the ruling of the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan,” in favour of GM, the plaintiff car group Spyker said in a short statement from its headquarters in the central Dutch town of Zeewolde.

It did not give any further details.

Spyker filed a lawsuit in August claiming $3 billion in damages.

It alleged that GM criminally interfered in an operation that could have made it possible for Saab, which Spyker bought in 2010, to restructure and stay afloat, because the US automaker wanted to dominate the Chinese market.

Saab, a former GM subsidiary, filed for bankruptcy in December 2011 after teetering on the edge of the abyss for almost two years. A last-ditch bid to raise funds in China, with the Youngman group, was blocked by GM over issues concerning the transfer of technology.

Chinese carmaker Youngman had long been interested in buying Saab and tried

to snap it up before it declared bankruptcy — but its efforts were stymied by Saab’s former owner, GM, which balked at transferring the necessary technology

licences.

At the time, Spyker’s chief executive Victor Muller said that the $3 billion claim in compensation represented the value which Saab would have represented had the deal with Youngman gone through, but analysts at the time were sceptical whether the suit would succeed.

GM in its response to the claim denied any criminal action or intent, saying Saab had granted it a contractual right to agree, or not, to the transaction proposed by Spyker.

The US carmaker sold Saab in 2010 to Spyker. A deal reached parallel to the sale allowed Saab to keep using GM technologies and keep production going, but allowed GM to stop the arrangement if Saab changed hands.

GM has maintained that Spyker bought Saab “knowing its financial history, and subject to terms spelled out unambiguously in the arrangements attached to the complaint.”

“Those agreements include clear contractual limitations in the future use of GM’s technology, and on the transfer of technology to others,” GM said in a document, filed before the court a month after Spyker filed the claim.

SHOW COMMENTS