SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

Bond market jitters misplaced, Germany says

Germany was among the EU heavyweights that issued a joint declaration Friday insisting that bond market jitters over a future bailout fund are misplaced as Ireland suffers a debt crisis.

Bond market jitters misplaced, Germany says
Photo: DPA

“Any new (bailout) mechanism would only come into effect after mid-2013 with no impact whatsoever on the current arrangements,” finance ministers from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Spain said in the declaration, issued at a G20 summit in Seoul.

Germany is backing a plan to force private investors to bear a share of bailout costs for countries facing fiscal ruin.

But German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble stressed Friday this would only take effect in three years, and was not to blame for the rise in interest yields on Irish government bonds to record levels.

He said investors were guilty of a “total misunderstanding.”

“It has to do with decisions from the European Council (EU leaders), and it’s a total misassessment of the issues at hand…. It has absolutely nothing to do with any current discussion, and you can’t get them mixed up,” he added.

Ireland’s cost of borrowing hit record highs on Thursday. Ten-year government bond yields jumped to 8.929 percent, the highest level since the euro was created in 1999, placing Europe’s bond markets under serious strain.

The leap fuelled fears that the eurozone debt and deficit crisis could be entering a dangerous second phase just six months after a massive bailout of Greece, to which Germany was the biggest contributor.

Portuguese bond yields also hit historic peaks on Thursday.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Thursday that European taxpayers should not pay the whole cost of rescuing debt-laden countries.

“Let me put it simply – there may be a contradiction between the interests of the financial world and those of the political world,” she said at a G20 business summit in Seoul.

“We cannot explain to our voters and citizens why taxpayers must finance certain risks, and not those who made a great deal of money taking those risks.”

Under Merkel’s proposals, future rescue packages would only be launched if government bondholders agree to bear some losses.

EU leaders agreed last month to design a permanent plan of aid and penalties for eurozone countries facing fiscal ruin, to take over after the lifespan of a current crisis response fund ends in 2013.

But the European ministers stressed Friday that “the EFSF (European Financial Stability Fund) is already established and its activation does not require private-sector involvement,” adding that the new system from 2013 “could include a range of possibilities.”

“Whatever the debate within the euro area about the future permanent crisis resolution mechanism, and the potential for private sector involvement in that mechanism, we are clear that this does not apply to any outstanding debt and any programme under current instruments,” they said.

European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso said Thursday that the European Union was prepared to stand by Ireland.

“What is important to know is that we have all the necessary instruments in place now to support Ireland if necessary,” said Barroso.

Irish bond yields – the rate of return paid to investors holding the government debt instruments – have soared in the face of mounting investor unease at the stretched public finances. Later this month, Finance Minister Brian Lenihan will unveil a four-year programme of austerity measures that will involve a €15-billion correction to rein in the huge public deficit, ahead of the annual budget in December.

AFP/ka

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

The EU has drawn up plans to make it easier for non-EU citizens to gain longterm EU residency so they can move more easily around the bloc, but Italy-based citizens' rights campaigner Clarissa Killwick says Brits who moved to the EU before Brexit are already losing out.

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

With all the talk about the EU long-term residency permit and the proposed improvements there is no mention that UK citizens who are Withdrawal Agreement “beneficiaries” are currently being left out in the cold.

The European Commission has stated that we can hold multiple statuses including the EU long-term permit (Under a little-known EU law, third-country nationals can in theory acquire EU-wide long-term resident status if they have lived ‘legally’ in an EU country for at least five years) but in reality it is just not happening.

This effectively leaves Brits locked into their host countries while other third country nationals can enjoy some mobility rights. As yet, in Italy, it is literally a question of the computer saying no if someone tries to apply.

The lack of access to the EU long-term permit to pre-Brexit Brits is an EU-wide issue and has been flagged up to the European Commission but progress is very slow.

READ ALSO: EU government settle on rules for how non-EU citizens could move around Europe

My guess is that few UK nationals who already have permanent residency status under the Withdrawal Agreement are even aware of the extra mobility rights they could have with the EU long-term residency permit – or do not even realise they are two different things.

Perhaps there won’t be very large numbers clamouring for it but it is nothing short of discrimination not to make it accessible to British people who’ve built their lives in the EU.

They may have lost their status as EU citizens but nothing has changed concerning the contributions they make, both economically and socially.

An example of how Withdrawal Agreement Brits in Italy are losing out

My son, who has lived almost his whole life here, wanted to study in the Netherlands to improve his employment prospects.

Dutch universities grant home fees rather than international fees to holders of an EU long-term permit. The difference in fees for a Master’s, for example, is an eye-watering €18,000. He went through the application process, collecting the requisite documents, making the payments and waited many months for an appointment at the “questura”, (local immigration office).

On the day, it took some persuading before they agreed he should be able to apply but then the whole thing was stymied because the national computer system would not accept a UK national. I am in no doubt, incidentally, that had he been successful he would have had to hand in his WA  “carta di soggiorno”.

This was back in February 2022 and nothing has budged since then. In the meantime, it is a question of pay up or give up for any students in the same boat as my son. There is, in fact, a very high take up of the EU long-term permit in Italy so my son’s non-EU contemporaries do not face this barrier.

Long-term permit: The EU’s plan to make freedom of movement easier for non- EU nationals 

Completing his studies was stalled by a year until finally his Italian citizenship came through after waiting over 5 years.  I also meet working adults in Italy with the EU long-term permit who use it for work purposes, such as in Belgium and Germany, and for family reunification.  

Withdrawal agreement card should double up as EU long-term residency permit

A statement that Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries should be able to hold multiple statuses is not that easy to find. You have to scroll quite far down the page on the European Commission’s website to find a link to an explanatory document. It has been languishing there since March 2022 but so far not proved very useful.

It has been pointed out to the Commission that the document needs to be multilingual not just in English and “branded” as an official communication from the Commission so it can be used as a stand-alone. But having an official document you can wave at the immigration authorities is going to get you nowhere if Member State governments haven’t acknowledged that WA beneficiaries can hold multiple statuses and issue clear guidance and make sure systems are modified accordingly.

I can appreciate this is no mean feat in countries where they do not usually allow multiple statuses or, even if they do, issue more than one residency card. Of course, other statuses we should be able to hold are not confined to EU long-term residency, they should include the EU Blue Card, dual nationality, family member of an EU citizen…

Personally, I do think people should be up in arms about this. The UK and EU negotiated an agreement which not only removed our freedom of movement as EU citizens, it also failed to automatically give us equal mobility rights to other third country nationals. We are now neither one thing nor the other.

It would seem the only favour the Withdrawal Agreement did us was we didn’t have to go out and come back in again! Brits who follow us, fortunate enough to get a visa, may well pip us at the post being able to apply for EU long-term residency as clearly defined non-EU citizens.

I have been bringing this issue to the attention of the embassy in Rome, FCDO and the European Commission for three years now. I hope we will see some movement soon.

Finally, there should be no dragging of heels assuming we will all take citizenship of our host countries. Actually, we shouldn’t have to, my son was fortunate, even though it took a long time. Others may not meet the requirements or wish to give up their UK citizenship in countries which do not permit dual nationality.  

Bureaucratic challenges may seem almost insurmountable but why not simply allow our Withdrawal Agreement permanent card to double up as the EU long-term residency permit.

Clarissa Killwick,

Since 2016, Clarissa has been a citizens’ rights campaigner and advocate with the pan-European group, Brexpats – Hear Our Voice.
She is co-founder and co-admin of the FB group in Italy, Beyond Brexit – UK citizens in Italy.

SHOW COMMENTS