SHARE
COPY LINK
WORLD CUP

WORLD CUP

Swedish coaches carry African World Cup hopes

Two African nations are counting on the tactical know-how of a pair of wily to help them go far in the first ever World Cup to be held on the continent, writes AFP's Pirate Irwin.

Swedish coaches carry African World Cup hopes

African World Cup finalists have been used in the past to having a sequence of mainly French coaches but this time round they have taken on a Swedish air with the experienced duo of Sven-Göran Eriksson and Lars Lagerbäck at the helm of Ivory Coast and Nigeria respectively.

Both Eriksson and Lagerbäck bring years of experience at the top level of European football to the job, something which was in the main lacking in coaches of previous African finalists such as French duo Philippe Troussier and Bruno Metsu.

Troussier may have acquired the moniker of the ‘white witch doctor’ yet he failed to work his magic with South Africa in the 1998 finals but the long haired and laid back Metsu did succeed as he guided Senegal to the 2002 quarter-finals.

That was the same stage at which Eriksson and England exited, as they were to four years later, but despite leaving the Mexico hotseat after an undistinguished spell in charge where they were in danger of missing out on the finals, the Ivory Coast had no hesitation in hiring the 62-year-old Swede.

The former Lazio, Fiorentina and Sampdoria coach was called up after the ‘Elephants’ underwhelming performance at the Africa Cup of Nations earlier this year and star striker Didier Drogba is in no doubt he is the man who can get them through the group stage, unlike four years ago where Frenchman Henri Michel failed to do so.

“Eriksson is one of the very best managers on the market, and has done a lot of good things with the England team,” the 32-year-old Chelsea star told the BBC World Service.

“He is a very good professional and with his experience I hope we can beat one or two of the big teams,” added Drogba, who is battling to be fit having broken his forearm in a warm-up match against Japan.

Eriksson, who guided Lazio to the 2000 Serie A title and the 1999 Cup Winners Cup trophy, will face his first test against Portugal at the finals – the team that knocked England out in a penalty shootout at the 2006 finals in the quarter-finals.

The unflappable Swede, though, didn’t remark on that irony only focusing on the present.

“The first game is very important… it’s like the final for us,” said Eriksson, who will do well to get them through to the second round with five-time champions and dark horses North Korea also in the group.

“Portugal are always difficult as they are technically very good, tactically good.”

While Eriksson faces up to surviving the ‘Group of Death’ Lagerbäck – coach of Sweden for 10 years and assistant for two years prior to that – is remarkably upbeat about his side’s chances of making it through to the second round even though it is a long time since the team justified its nom de guerre of the ‘Super Eagles’.

Their first test comes on Saturday against two-time winners Argentina.

“If we give 100 percent we can beat any team,” said the 61-year-old last week, whose side will also play Greece and South Korea.

“The ‘Super Eagles’ are ready to take on the best in the world and we know there are high expectations, especially from our supporters.

“It has been wonderful since I took over. The attitude of the players has been great and we prepared well,” added the coach who replaced Shaibu Amodu soon after Nigeria finished third at the African Nations Cup last January.

Lagerbäck’s confidence that he can work a miracle is not matched, though, by his Argentine counterpart Diego Maradona.

“I don’t think it’s a good thing to change a coach on such short notice but perhaps he (Lagerbäck) can introduce some good elements, such as set-pieces,” said Maradona.

“But it all depends on the players and he’ll have to plan his matches according to the players he has.

“But in football you need continuity and I wish him all the best but he has very little time to work on many things he should be doing as a coach.”

AFP’s Pirate Irwin

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

SPORT

Norway’s football clubs to vote on Qatar World Cup boycott

Will Norwegian football star Erling Braut Haaland stay home or play on what fans have dubbed a "cemetery?" This Sunday, a meeting of Norway's football community will decide whether to boycott next year's World Cup in Qatar.

Norway's football clubs to vote on Qatar World Cup boycott
Norway's forward Erling Haaland (L) and teammates wear jerseys reading "Fair play for migrant workers" before the international friendly football match between Norway and Greece at La Rosaleda stadium in Malaga in preperation for the UEFA European Championships, on June 6, 2021. JORGE GUERRERO / AFP

Under pressure from grassroots activists the Norwegian Football Federation(NFF) has decided to hold an extraordinary congress to decide on whether to pass up football’s showpiece event all together.

The games on the pitches in the Middle Eastern emirate will “unfortunately be like playing on a cemetery,” according to Ole Kristian Sandvik, spokesman of the Norwegian Supporters Alliance (NSA), invoking a commonly used metaphor among opponents of Norway’s participation.

Norway, which has not qualified for a major international competition since Euro 2000, is currently fourth in its World Cup qualifying group behind Turkey, the Netherlands and Montenegro. 

So while qualification seems an uphill task, the result of the vote could have an impact on whether Norway and its young star Haaland — one of the rising stars of world football — continue to play qualifying matches. 

The movement calling for a boycott began north of the Arctic Circle when football club Tromso IL spoke out against turning a blind eye to alleged human rights abuses at the end of February.

“We can no longer sit and watch people die in the name of football,” the first division club proclaimed.

Qatar has faced criticism for its treatment of migrant workers, many of whom are involved in the construction of stadiums and infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup, with campaigners accusing employers of exploitation and forcing labourers to work in dangerous conditions.

Qatari authorities meanwhile insist they have done more than any country in the region to improve worker welfare.

“There is no doubt that this World Cup should never have been awarded to Qatar,” Tom Hogli, a former professional footballer turned public relations officer for Tromso IL, told AFP.

“The conditions there are abominable and many have lost their lives,” he added.

In March, a spokesman for the Qatari organisers put the number of deaths on the construction sites at “three” since 2014, with another 35 having died away from their workplaces, challenging the heavy toll reported by some rights groups.

Push from fans
The Tromso call began gathering pace in Norway, where clubs operate under a democratic structure, and under pressure from fans, many teams now say “nei” (no).

According to Sandvik, the fans feel that the deaths on the World Cup sites would have been avoided “if they had not had to build hotels, railways and stadiums”.

Nearly half of Norwegians, 49 percent, now say they are in favour of a boycott, while only 29 percent are against it, according to a poll published by newspaper VG on Wednesday.

The Nordic country’s national squad has already protested conditions in Qatar, but stopped short of calling for a boycott.

Before recent Norway games, Borussia Dortmund superstar Haaland, captain Martin Odegaard and the rest of the team have worn t-shirts with slogans like “Human rights on and off the pitch.”

Other countries, like Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark have also followed suit.

FIFA, on the other hand, argue that awarding the hosting of the World Cup in Qatar has opened the door to social progress.

“We know there is still work to be done, but we need to recognise the significant progress achieved in a very short time,” FIFA president Gianni Infantino said in May.

‘Few successes’ 
While the executive committee of the NFF have said they regret Qatar being awarded the World Cup, they oppose a boycott.

President Terje Svendsen said he thought it was “not the right tool to improve the human rights situation or the working conditions in Qatar,” when speaking at the federation’s ordinary annual congress in March.

According to the NFF, a boycott could end up costing Norway 205 million Norwegian kroner ($24 million, 20 million euros) in fines and compensation as well as lost revenue.

Feeling the pressure from grassroots campaigns, the NFF referred the matter to an extraordinary congress which on Sunday will bring together the eight members of its executive committee, representatives of 18 districts and of hundreds of professional and amateur clubs.

The discussions will be revolve around the findings of an expert committee which, with the exception of two members representing fans, has also come out against a boycott.

“For a boycott to succeed, you need a critical mass behind it, an opposition that calls for it in the country, the UN to put pressure on the
authorities, the business world, the trade unions and civil society to put pressure on it in the long term,” committee chairman Sven Mollekleiv said in a debate hosted by broadcaster TV2.

“Historically, there are few successes,” he said.

Rather than a boycott, the committee recommended 26 measures to consolidate and further the gains made in Qatar but also to ensure that FIFA doesn’t become complicit in so called “sportswashing” — the polishing of a country’s public image through a major sporting event.

Some initial supporters of a boycott, like Tromso’s Hogli, have since sided with these conclusions, although calls for a complete boycott remain.

SHOW COMMENTS