SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

Sweden plans for move to heart of Europe

With just a couple of months remaining until Sweden assumes the reins of the EU presidency, The Local's Thanh Dinh speaks to Minister for EU Affairs Cecilia Malmström about the challenges ahead.

Sweden plans for move to heart of Europe

Separated from mainland Europe by a body of water and far from the EU’s bustling Brussels headquarters, Sweden’s geographical distance from the heart of the action has long been complemented by a similar psychological divide. Yet, from July 1st, Sweden takes over the rotating EU presidency and plans are underway to lead the country to the core of Europe.

This marks a decisive shift in Sweden’s traditional policy towards the EU, from a country sceptical towards Europe to one seeking a more central role and openly embracing it. The move is not limited to the confines of Parliament; Cecilia Malmström, Minister of EU Affairs, sees public support for the EU among the Swedish people and hopes that the presidency will bolster it.

“We see the presidency as a unique opportunity to increase interest in the EU in Sweden and show how EU issues affect people’s day-to-day lives”, Malmström tells The Local. In order to achieve this aim, a special secretariat employing 20 people has been established to coordinate communication in the run up to and during the presidency itself.

Preparing for the EU presidency is a huge undertaking. Preparations began in earnest in autumn 2006 when the current government took office, and Malmström reveals that “most people at the government offices are involved in one way or another in the presidency [preparations]”.

Over 3,000 meetings are scheduled for the six-month presidency, the vast majority of which are being held in Brussels or Luxembourg but some 100 meetings will also take place in Sweden. A secretariat of 55 personnel alone is charged with overseeing the practical implementations of the meetings on national soil. They have an exhaustive list of logistical preparations that ranges from the critical issue of security arrangement to organising interpretation and translation services for the visiting dignitaries of the 27 member states to the finer details of the meals that will be served.

“We are very well prepared”, says Anders Tagesson of Sweden’s security police, Säpo, on the subject of security provisions for the meetings in Sweden.

“We are working together with the national criminal police, the government and the local police to ensure that the meetings are conducted safely, both for the officials and the public alike”.

On July 1st, the preparations will make way for the real work of presiding over the EU. Sweden has a clear set of priorities and at the top of the list are climate change, economic growth and immigration.

“A lot of Swedes feel strongly about the climate issue and Sweden is in many aspects a role model for other countries. Not least, we’ve shown that by applying forward-looking climate policies we can have both economic growth and reduced emissions. During our presidency, our goal is for the EU to successfully bring about a global agreement when the United Nations holds its climate conference in Copenhagen in December 2009”, explains Malmström.

Sweden will act “forcefully” towards helping Europe recover from the economic crisis and to “restore confidence in the financial system”. Malmström asserts, “the EU as a whole must hasten economic recovery, create jobs and promote welfare in member states”.

The agendas are ambitious, but even before the start of the presidency, it is clear that Sweden will likely face challenges in achieving its priorities. Sweden’s presidency will have to cope with severe operational challenges because it coincides with the installment of a new EU Parliament and Commission, and both institutions will require time to normalise their operations, “making things more difficult than they usually are”.

Then there are concerns about the achievements of the present Czech EU presidency and its effects on Sweden’s presidency. Sweden is a member of a trio presidency with France and the Czech Republic, together the trio have agreed on an 18-month programme of shared objectives with France leading the way in July 2008, followed by the Czech Republic and concluding with Sweden.

The problem is that the incumbent Czech president, Mr. Vaclav Klaus, is a staunch eurosceptic and holds contrary views about climate change, which are completely at odds with the trio presidency. Although Klaus holds a non-executive office and has little influence over the proceedings of the Czech EU presidency, the fact that his country is presiding over the EU afford him more media coverage than warranted and brings public attention to his personal viewpoint, potentially undermining the collective stance of the trio presidency.

Malmström does not see reasons for concern. “With the recent fall of the Czech government the domestic situation for the Czechs is far from stable. But I am confident that the Czech Republic will continue conducting the Council Presidency as effectively as it has done until now,” says Malmström.

“When Sweden takes over on the 1st of July, we will continue working together with the Czech Republic on important issues such as the climate issue, the financial crisis, employment and the international relations of the EU”.

Malmström’s positivism is clear and she is confident that the Swedish presidency will be a success. “We will do our very best to conduct an effective, open and result-oriented presidency in the interests of the whole of Europe”, she says.

Hardly the words of a shy wallflower; this is fighting talk from a country with unmistakable ambitions. The Swedish EU presidency may very well witness a new, more active Sweden on the EU stage.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

The EU has drawn up plans to make it easier for non-EU citizens to gain longterm EU residency so they can move more easily around the bloc, but Italy-based citizens' rights campaigner Clarissa Killwick says Brits who moved to the EU before Brexit are already losing out.

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

With all the talk about the EU long-term residency permit and the proposed improvements there is no mention that UK citizens who are Withdrawal Agreement “beneficiaries” are currently being left out in the cold.

The European Commission has stated that we can hold multiple statuses including the EU long-term permit (Under a little-known EU law, third-country nationals can in theory acquire EU-wide long-term resident status if they have lived ‘legally’ in an EU country for at least five years) but in reality it is just not happening.

This effectively leaves Brits locked into their host countries while other third country nationals can enjoy some mobility rights. As yet, in Italy, it is literally a question of the computer saying no if someone tries to apply.

The lack of access to the EU long-term permit to pre-Brexit Brits is an EU-wide issue and has been flagged up to the European Commission but progress is very slow.

READ ALSO: EU government settle on rules for how non-EU citizens could move around Europe

My guess is that few UK nationals who already have permanent residency status under the Withdrawal Agreement are even aware of the extra mobility rights they could have with the EU long-term residency permit – or do not even realise they are two different things.

Perhaps there won’t be very large numbers clamouring for it but it is nothing short of discrimination not to make it accessible to British people who’ve built their lives in the EU.

They may have lost their status as EU citizens but nothing has changed concerning the contributions they make, both economically and socially.

An example of how Withdrawal Agreement Brits in Italy are losing out

My son, who has lived almost his whole life here, wanted to study in the Netherlands to improve his employment prospects.

Dutch universities grant home fees rather than international fees to holders of an EU long-term permit. The difference in fees for a Master’s, for example, is an eye-watering €18,000. He went through the application process, collecting the requisite documents, making the payments and waited many months for an appointment at the “questura”, (local immigration office).

On the day, it took some persuading before they agreed he should be able to apply but then the whole thing was stymied because the national computer system would not accept a UK national. I am in no doubt, incidentally, that had he been successful he would have had to hand in his WA  “carta di soggiorno”.

This was back in February 2022 and nothing has budged since then. In the meantime, it is a question of pay up or give up for any students in the same boat as my son. There is, in fact, a very high take up of the EU long-term permit in Italy so my son’s non-EU contemporaries do not face this barrier.

Long-term permit: The EU’s plan to make freedom of movement easier for non- EU nationals 

Completing his studies was stalled by a year until finally his Italian citizenship came through after waiting over 5 years.  I also meet working adults in Italy with the EU long-term permit who use it for work purposes, such as in Belgium and Germany, and for family reunification.  

Withdrawal agreement card should double up as EU long-term residency permit

A statement that Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries should be able to hold multiple statuses is not that easy to find. You have to scroll quite far down the page on the European Commission’s website to find a link to an explanatory document. It has been languishing there since March 2022 but so far not proved very useful.

It has been pointed out to the Commission that the document needs to be multilingual not just in English and “branded” as an official communication from the Commission so it can be used as a stand-alone. But having an official document you can wave at the immigration authorities is going to get you nowhere if Member State governments haven’t acknowledged that WA beneficiaries can hold multiple statuses and issue clear guidance and make sure systems are modified accordingly.

I can appreciate this is no mean feat in countries where they do not usually allow multiple statuses or, even if they do, issue more than one residency card. Of course, other statuses we should be able to hold are not confined to EU long-term residency, they should include the EU Blue Card, dual nationality, family member of an EU citizen…

Personally, I do think people should be up in arms about this. The UK and EU negotiated an agreement which not only removed our freedom of movement as EU citizens, it also failed to automatically give us equal mobility rights to other third country nationals. We are now neither one thing nor the other.

It would seem the only favour the Withdrawal Agreement did us was we didn’t have to go out and come back in again! Brits who follow us, fortunate enough to get a visa, may well pip us at the post being able to apply for EU long-term residency as clearly defined non-EU citizens.

I have been bringing this issue to the attention of the embassy in Rome, FCDO and the European Commission for three years now. I hope we will see some movement soon.

Finally, there should be no dragging of heels assuming we will all take citizenship of our host countries. Actually, we shouldn’t have to, my son was fortunate, even though it took a long time. Others may not meet the requirements or wish to give up their UK citizenship in countries which do not permit dual nationality.  

Bureaucratic challenges may seem almost insurmountable but why not simply allow our Withdrawal Agreement permanent card to double up as the EU long-term residency permit.

Clarissa Killwick,

Since 2016, Clarissa has been a citizens’ rights campaigner and advocate with the pan-European group, Brexpats – Hear Our Voice.
She is co-founder and co-admin of the FB group in Italy, Beyond Brexit – UK citizens in Italy.

SHOW COMMENTS