SHARE
COPY LINK

PIRACY

Publishers begin hunt for Swedish file sharers

With the new anti-file-sharing IPRED law fresh on Sweden's law books, five book publishers have applied to the courts to trace a suspected illegal file sharer.

Publishers begin hunt for Swedish file sharers

Five audio book publishers – Earbooks, Storyside, Piratförlaget, Bonniers and Norstedts – on Wednesday submitted an application to Solna district court to find out the identity of the person behind a particular IP address.

The publishers, in accordance with the new IPRED law which passed into force on April 1st, have submitted evidence to support their assertion that the IP address has been used for the illegal dispersal of audio books over the internet.

The publishers are acting with the support of the 15 authors affected: Leif G W Persson, Jan Guillou, Håkan Nesser, Henning Mankell, Catharina Ingelman-Sundberg, Karin Wahlberg, Åsa Larsson, P O Enquist, Torbjörn Flygt, Ernst Brunner, Mia Törnblom, Andreas Roman, Katerina Janouch, Jens Lapidus and the estate of deceased crime novelist Stieg Larsson.

The five publishers write in a joint statement that they will consider how to proceed once they have received customer details from the suspected file sharer’s internet supplier.

“The illegal sharing of audio books through file sharing has grown very quickly over the past year,” according to Kjell Bohlund, the chairperson of the Swedish Publishers’ Association.

“It has hit writers, publishers and internet book retailers financially and there is a longer term risk that publication will decline.”

Bohlund writes in the statement that the case in question concerns a very large amount of material with evidence that up to 2,000 audio books are stored on the server in question.

The association supports the five publishers in their legal process.

The record industry equivalent, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), confirmed on Wednesday that it is preparing its own first case.

“We are in the process of collecting evidence and we will not be finished with that within the coming week. The book publishers are welcome to go first,” said IFPI’s Swedish section CEO Lars Gustafsson.

Reactions to the news of the first IPRED case came thick and fast on Wednesday with Mattias Lökvist, a partner in Swedish record label Hybris, telling Dagens Nyheter:

“It is tragic that the book sector is choosing to go the same way as the music and film companies. Publishers still have a lot of goodwill to lose. They should get behind something new instead of suing their customers.”

The file sharing law, which is based on the European Union’s Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), was passed by the Swedish parliament after a spirited debate on February 25th.

The law allows courts to order internet operators to hand over details that identify suspected illegal file sharers.

According to the law there has to exist “probable cause” for a court to issue an order to divulge an IP address.

“It will be interesting to see what the court determines is sufficient proof. We are naturally examining their evidence and comparing it with ours,” said Lars Gustafsson.

FACEBOOK

Denmark proposes new law to make Facebook pay for news and music

The government is to forward a bill on Friday proposing tech giants such as Facebook and Google pay Danish media for using content on their platforms.

Denmark proposes new law to make Facebook pay for news and music
File photo: Regis Duvignau/Reuters/Ritzau Scanpix

The proposal will also mean platforms used to share media, such as YouTube, will be required to make agreements with rights holders in order to display videos or music, the Ministry of Culture said in a statement.

A comparable law recently took effect in Australia, resulting in all news pages being temporarily blocked for Facebook users in the southern hemisphere country.

READ ALSO: Could Denmark force Facebook to pay for news content?

“The media plays a central role in our democracy and ensures that public debate takes place on an infrormed basis,”culture minister Joy Mogensen said in the statement.

“If the media are to be able to continue making journalism, they should of course be paid for its use,” she added.

The proposal will provide for rights holders such as musicians or media outlets to be given a new publishing right which will enable them to decide who can use their content.

As such, companies like Facebook and Google will need permission to use the content online.

The Danish proposal builds on an EU directive which gives individual media outlets the right to agree deals with tech giants.

The bill put forward by Mogensen will allow Danish media to make a collective agreement with the tech companies providing for payment when their content is used.

An interest organisation for Danish media companies has backed the proposal.

“We have wanted to be able to enter collective agreements with tech giants because that would strengthen the media companies’ position,” Louise Brincker, CEO of Danske Medier, told newspaper Berlingske. Brincker noted she had not yet read the full proposal.

Media will not be obliged to make agreements with the tech companies, however. Complaints to the Danish copyright board, Ophavsretslicensnævnet, will be possible under the new law, should it be passed by parliament.

The bill will become law on June 7th should it receive the backing of a parliamentary majority.

Both Facebook and Google decline to comment to Berlingske on the matter, stating they had yet to see the bill in full.

SHOW COMMENTS