SHARE
COPY LINK

CARS

‘Chinese firms too small for Volvo takeover’

Chinese car makers are too small to take over troubled Swedish firm Volvo despite the persistent rumours of an imminent bid, market analysts have said.

Despite their global ambitions, Chinese automakers are still not big enough to take over their troubled foreign rivals, analysts and company officials said.

Reports have swirled for weeks on persistent rumours that Chinese automakers are eyeing the chance to buy Sweden’s Volvo from US giant Ford Motor Co. or to take either Swedish unit Saab or American all-terrain vehicle-maker Hummer off the hands of General Motors.

The companies at the centre of the rumours, such as Geely, one of China’s largest private automakers, have repeatedly denied the reports while at the same time fanning the rumours by saying they are open to foreign acquisitions.

Such acquisitions are a route through which Geely could access capital, new markets and international partnerships, according to the car company’s website.

Analysts, however, said they do not expect to see any startling Chinese auto acquisitions in the near future.

“Compared with more than 40 billion yuan (5.8 billion dollars) needed to acquire Volvo, (Geely’s) market value is only about three billion yuan,” consultancy Roland Berger said in a research note.

“The total assets of Chery Automobile are about 30 billion yuan, with capital of three to four billion yuan and the acquisition requires about 40 billion yuan,” the firm said, listing the Chinese automakers that would be most likely to bid.

The market value of Chang’an Auto is only about 8.5 billion yuan, it added.

“I do not see any kind of possibility that a local company would acquire Volvo or Hummer. It is not realistic financially or even in terms of management capability,” said John Zeng, a Beijing-based analyst with Global Insight.

“For a number of Chinese companies, their sole experience with foreigners is their joint ventures in China. They have never operated overseas,” he said.

One exception – and one that has turned out badly – is SAIC’s acquisition in 2004 of small South Korean automaker Ssangyong, which now faces bankruptcy.

Jia Xinguang, an analyst with the China Automotive Industry Consulting and Development Corporation, agrees Chinese companies lack the necessary management experience.

“The complicated relationship between trade unions and employers in foreign companies is another problem for them,” he added.

But size is the main obstacle.

“Any overseas acquisition needs National Development and Reform Commission approval and at his time the NDRC has concerns about Chinese companies’ capacity to run such acquisitions,” said John Shen, an analyst for Roland Berger.

Late last month Chen Bin, the head of the commission, effectively warned Chinese automakers they were not yet ready to rub shoulders with international players but at the same time told them “all options were open.”

Last week, Beijing once again urged China’s crowded domestic auto sector to consolidate.

But the international opportunities remain attractive as a means to acquire the technology that the Chinese automakers need.

“They do not have strong brand technology and are still relying heavily on foreign partners. Over 60 percent of vehicle production comes from joint ventures including more than 85 percent of passenger cars,” Global Insight’s Zeng said.

“One more realistic way to go would be to go for some core assets which they need, rather than buy the whole company,” Roland Berger’s Shen said.

That could make more sense at a time when several Chinese companies, notably SAIC, FAW and DongFeng Motor Corp, want to establish their own brands.

It is a path Geely seems to have taken with its acquisition on Friday of Australian auto parts manufacturer Drivetran Systems.

Geely said the deal would improve its capability to develop and produce gearboxes, or transmission – a key technology that Chinese automakers must learn to master to be globally competitive.

The fact that Chinese automakers crave the global spotlight may mean they enjoy the attention the rumours over foreign acquisitions bring, Shen said.

“A lot of companies are taking advantage of it to promote their brand so they are not taking active measures to clarify the rumours,” he added.

CARS

From lizards to water, eco-bumps snag Tesla’s giant Berlin car factory

In the green forest outside Berlin, a David and Goliath-style battle is playing out between electric carmaker Tesla and environmental campaigners who want to stop its planned "gigafactory".

From lizards to water, eco-bumps snag Tesla's giant Berlin car factory
Tesla's gigafactory outside the doors of Berlin. dpa-Zentralbild | Patrick Pleul

“When I saw on TV that the Tesla factory was going to be built here, I couldn’t believe it,” said Steffen Schorch, driving his trusty German-made car.

The 60-year-old from Erkner village in the Berlin commuter belt has become one of the faces of the fight against the US auto giant’s first European factory, due to open in the Brandenburg region near Berlin in July.

“Tesla needs far too much water, and the region does not have this water,” said the environmental activist, a local representative of the Nabu ecologist campaign group.

Announced in November 2019, Tesla’s gigafactory project was warmly welcomed as an endorsement of the “Made in Germany” quality mark – but was immediately met with opposition from local residents.

Demonstrations, legal action, open letters – residents have done everything in their power to delay the project, supported by powerful
environmental campaign groups Nabu and Gruene Liga.

Tesla was forced to temporarily suspend forest clearing last year after campaigners won an injunction over threats to the habitats of resident lizards and snakes during their winter slumber.

READ MORE: Is Germany’s Volkswagen becoming ‘the new Tesla’ as it ramps up e-vehicle production?

And now they have focused their attention on water consumption – which could reach up to 3.6 million cubic metres a year, or around 30 percent of the region’s available supply, according to the ZDF public broadcaster.

The extra demand could place a huge burden on a region already affected by water shortages and hit by summer droughts for the past three years.

Local residents and environmentalists are also concerned about the impact on the wetlands, an important source of biodiversity in the region.

Tesla Street

“The water situation is bad, and will get worse,” Heiko Baschin, a spokesman for the neighbourhood association IG Freienbrink, told AFP.

Brandenburg’s environment minister Axel Vogel sought to play down the issue, saying in March that “capacity has not been exceeded for now”.

But the authorities admit that “the impact of droughts is significant” and have set up a working group to examine the issue in the long term.

The gigafactory is set to sprawl over 300 hectares – equivalent to approximately 560 football fields – southwest of the German capital.

Tesla is aiming to produce 500,000 electric vehicles a year at the plant, which will also be home to “the largest battery factory in the world”,
according to group boss Elon Musk.

In a little over a year and a half, swathes of coniferous forest have already been cleared to make way for vast concrete rectangles on a red earth base, accessed via the already iconic Tesla Strasse (Tesla Street).

German bureaucracy

The new site still has only provisional construction permits, but Tesla has been authorised by local officials to begin work at its own risk.

Final approval depends on an assessment of the project’s environmental impact – including the issue of water.

In theory, if approval is not granted, Tesla will have to dismantle the entire complex at its own expense.

But “pressure is being exerted (on the regulatory authorities), linked to Tesla’s significant investment”, Gruene Liga’s Michael Greschow told AFP.

In early April, Tesla said it was “irritated” by the slow pace of German bureaucracy, calling for exceptions to the rules for projects that help the environment.

Economy Minister Peter Altmaier agreed in April that his government “had not done enough” to reduce bureaucracy, lauding the gigafactory as a “very important project”.

Despite Germany’s reputation for efficiency, major infrastructure projects are often held up by bureaucracy criticised as excessive by the business community.

Among the most embarrassing examples are Berlin’s new airport which opened last October after an eight-year delay and Stuttgart’s new train station, which has been under construction since 2010.

Brandenburg’s economy minister, Joerg Steinbach, raised the possibility in February that the Tesla factory could be delayed beyond its July planned opening for the same reason.

SEE ALSO: Tesla advertises over 300 jobs for new Gigafactory near Berlin

SHOW COMMENTS