SHARE
COPY LINK

CRIME

EU opens probe into cartel practices by Spain’s Glovo food delivery app

The EU launched an investigation on Tuesday to determine whether online food-delivery companies Delivery Hero and Glovo engaged in anti-competitive practices.

EU opens probe into cartel practices by Spain's Glovo food delivery app
The EU opened an invesgation into the practices of meal delivery companies, Delivery Hero and Glovo on July 23, 2024. (Photo by GABRIEL BOUYS / AFP)

The probe comes after surprise raids at the firms, which are two of the largest food delivery companies in Europe, in June 2022 and November 2023.

READ MORE: EU inspectors raid Barcelona office of food delivery company Glovo

From July 2018, Delivery Hero, based in Germany, held a minority share in Spanish delivery company Glovo, and in July 2022 it acquired sole control.

The European Commission is concerned that before the takeover, the two companies “may have allocated geographic markets and shared commercially sensitive information (e.g., on commercial strategies, prices, capacity, costs, product characteristics)”, it said.

Delivery Hero’s then minority share could have “facilitated” these practices.

Glovo has more than 12,000 riders in Spain alone but operates in 24 other countries. The company has already been fined by Spanish authorities for not giving riders contracts and violating other labour laws

Earlier this month, Delivery Hero warned that it faced a possible fine of more than €400 million ($434 million) for allegedly violating antitrust rules.

Delivery Hero and Glovo said in separate statements they were “fully” cooperating with the EU and “committed to meeting all compliance and regulatory requirements”.

“The opening of an investigation does not mean that the European Commission has concluded on whether an actual infringement of competition law may have occurred,” Delivery Hero said.

The commission said the probe was part of the powerful EU competition regulator’s “efforts to ensure that online food delivery and the groceries sector deliver choice and reasonable prices to consumers”.

The EU is also suspicious the firms agreed not to poach each other’s workers, and said this probe was the first on “no-poach agreements formally initiated by the Commission”.

“This investigation is also part of the Commission’s efforts to ensure a fair labour market where employers do not collude to limit the number and quality of opportunities for workers but compete for talents,” it added.

‘Negative effects’ on prices?

The opening of a probe does not prejudge its outcome and there is no deadline for the investigation to be completed.

The companies risk fines of up to 10 percent of their annual worldwide turnover if found at fault.

“Online food delivery is a fast-growing sector, where we must protect competition,” said EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager.

“If confirmed, such conduct may amount to a breach of EU competition rules, with potential negative effects on prices and choice for consumers and on opportunities for workers,” she added.

Delivery Hero, listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, operates in more than 70 countries while Glovo is present in 25 nations.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

CRIME

Spanish actor’s son jailed for life for grisly Thai island murder

A Thai court on Thursday jailed a famous Spanish actor's son for life for the grisly murder of a Colombian plastic surgeon on a tropical holiday island, in a lurid case that has gripped Spain.

Spanish actor's son jailed for life for grisly Thai island murder

Daniel Sancho Bronchalo, a 30-year-old chef, was found guilty of the premeditated murder of Edwin Arrieta Arteaga on the tourist island of Koh Phangan last year.

The case has generated enormous interest in Spain because the defendant’s father Rodolfo Sancho is a well-known actor, and scores of Spanish reporters have flown in for the trial.

The court on the island of Koh Samui said in a statement that Sancho had been given a life sentence and ordered to pay 4.4 million baht (around $130,000) to Arrieta’s family.

Bussakorn Kaewleeled, a lawyer for the victim’s family, said they were happy with the outcome.

“The plaintiff is satisfied with the sentence because he will be put in prison for life and they receive some financial compensation,” Bussakorn told reporters outside the court on the island of Koh Samui.

“The verdict has been delivered, both sides have the right to appeal according to Thai law,” Bussakorn added.

When asked about Sancho’s reaction, she said: “He is sad, but we can’t forget the loss of the dead one”.

The trial heard that Sancho chopped up Arrieta’s body and put the parts in plastic bags before distributing them around Koh Phangan.

“We didn’t expect it (the life sentence) but we must accept what the Thai justice has said, we have to respect it,” Carmen Balfagón, a lawyer for Rodolfo Sancho, told reporters.

Marcos García-Montes, another Spanish lawyer representing the Sancho family, said they would launch an appeal.

Rodolfo Sancho and Silvia Bronchalo, the defendant’s mother, left court without speaking to reporters.

Sancho claimed he killed Arrieta, 44, in self-defence, and admitted hiding the body, but denied destroying the Colombian’s passport.

While Thailand still has the death penalty for some crimes, including premeditated murder, it rarely carries out executions — the last being in 2018.

“We always knew that premeditation was a provable fact and we had the elements to assert it,” Arrieta’s family said in a statement.

The family previously said they favoured a sentence of life imprisonment.

“Let him be left in Thailand so he can take time, all the time that God gives him to live, to think about what he did,” Darling Arrieta, the victim’s sister, said in an HBO documentary about the case.

Self-defence claim

Sancho and Arrieta agreed to meet in person after getting to know each other online.

Sancho’s father said in the same HBO documentary that Arrieta had threatened his son, and then “there was a fight, and in this fight, there was an accident”.

The defence argued that Sancho acted in legitimate self-defence after Arrieta tried to force him to have sex.

“He tried to rape me, and we fought,” Sancho said in a statement quoted by the Spanish daily El Mundo.

A lawyer for the victim’s family, Juan Gonzalo Ospina, said in a recent interview with El Mundo that Sancho was living a “false reality”.

Ospina said it was proven at the trial in April that Sancho had bought knives, plastic bags and cleaning supplies ahead of the crime, and kept them in the room where the killing took place.

SHOW COMMENTS