SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

TOURISM

What’s the difference between Italy’s city taxes and new ‘tourist tax’?

As Venice trials its new entrance fee for tourists, visitors may wonder how the new charge differs from existing 'tourist taxes' in Italian cities - and what the revenue is used for.

What’s the difference between Italy’s city taxes and new ‘tourist tax’?
Visitors to Venice this summer will likely have to pay a 'tourist tax' in some form - whether they stay overnight or not. Photo by Alessandro Ranica on Unsplash

The city of Venice recently approved a long-debated ‘tourist tax’, or entry fee, which was trialled for the first time on Thursday, April 25th, 2024.

But, as regular visitors will know, Venice and many other Italian cities already have a ‘tourist tax’ in place.

So what exactly is the difference, and is this an additional charge?

The city ‘tourist tax’

Italy’s existing ‘tourist tax’, officially known as an imposta di soggiorno, is a charge imposed by some town and city authorities on visitors staying in accommodation overnight.

The charge is applied at hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, hostels, campsites, etc. and is to be paid directly to the accommodation provider. It is often requested in cash.

It’s entirely up to each local authority whether, and how, it decided to charge such a tax, but as of 2023 around 1,000 towns and cities in Italy had one in place.

The rate varies by city and by type of accommodation. For example, Rome’s tourist tax rates vary from €3.50 to €10 per person per night.

If you’re a family staying at a hotel for several nights, this can add up to a significant extra cost – though under-tens are exempt from the charge in Rome (the age limit and other exemptions vary by city.)

Venice has the same type of tax on overnight stays, which varies between €1-5 per person per night.

READ ALSO: Is Como really bringing in a Venice-style ‘tourist tax’?

The idea behind the charge is that visitors benefit from services normally paid for in tax by residents (such as waste disposal, building maintenance and subsidised public transport) and that this helps offset the cost to the local authority of providing those services.

The money raised via these taxes is usually earmarked by the local authority for public services that benefit both visitors and residents.

Venice’s new ‘tourist tax’

The new charge in Venice, known officially as the Contributo di Accesso or ‘Venice Access Fee’, is instead aimed at turisti giornalieri (day-trippers).

While it is also often referred to as a ‘tourist tax’, in practice it’s more like an entry fee for the city’s centro storico (historic centre).

City authorities say the €5 charge, which will apply over 29 of the busiest travel dates in 2024, is designed to help control crowds in the city and lessen the impact of mass tourism on the city’s fragile infrastructure. 

A person shows a calendar of the paying days to visit Venice in 2024.

A person shows a calendar of the paying days to visit Venice in 2024. Photo by GABRIEL BOUYS / AFP.

Venice city council has said that all visitors aged 14 or over arriving between 8.30am and 4pm on these dates will have to pay the fee, unless they’re staying overnight.

Anyone staying at accommodation in the lagoon city would be exempt from the charge – but they would instead need to pay the existing city charge applied to overnight stays.

READ ALSO: How will Venice’s ‘tourist tax’ work?

It’s not yet known whether the charge will remain in place after this initial trial period, and there were no details immediately available as to what the money raised would be spent on – which is one reason the new ‘tax’ has faced heavy criticism.

In any case, those visiting Venice on the most popular dates this summer will likely be subject to either one of these charges.

No other Italian town or city currently charges an entry fee, though some are reportedly considering it.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

TOURISM

‘Not even that ancient’: The harshest TripAdvisor comments about Italy’s sights

From Roman ruins to grand Gothic palaces, Italy’s most popular tourist attractions welcome hundreds of thousands of visitors every year – but not everyone leaves satisfied.

'Not even that ancient': The harshest TripAdvisor comments about Italy's sights

With its rich cultural heritage and plenty of art and architecture wonders, Italy draws hundreds of thousands of visitors from all corners of the world every year. 

But a quick scroll through the review section of travel website TripAdvisor will be enough to show that some of the country’s most famous attractions aren’t to everyone’s taste.

Colosseum, Rome

It may be Italy’s biggest tourist attraction, but even the Colosseum – the largest ancient amphitheatre ever built, dating back to 80 AD – fails to impress some.

“I came. I saw. I left,” wrote one reviewer, saying that looking at pictures of the building and reading about its history will spare you from “a long wait line, a port a john [sic] bathroom, and a big disappointment”.

READ ALSO: Nine tips for making the most of a Rome city break

Others were seemingly not so happy with the overall state of the attraction.

“[It] was a lot more broken than I thought it would be, at £15 a pop you’d think they’d invest in repairing it,” one wrote. 

“Not even got a roof? When they finishing it [sic]?” asked another. 

Milan, Duomo 

Though it is often regarded as one of, if not the greatest example of Italian Gothic architecture, not everyone seems to be impressed by Milan’s Duomo cathedral. 

“The outside is gaudy and tacky as the worst of Las Vegas,” while “the inside is as bad taste as the outside” and not worth the wait, “even if they paid you”, one reviewer wrote.

READ ALSO: Stay away! How Europe’s most popular spots are fighting overtourism

Another said the Duomo was no different than any “old cathedral” found in every European city, claiming that “pigeons watching [sic] is more exciting than this building”.

Speaking of pigeons, one tourist warned future visitors about the aggressiveness of the local bird population, saying that the area surrounding the Duomo is “swarming with thousands of pigeons that have long ago lost any fear of humans” and will “fly directly at your head”, forcing you to “take evasive action”.

Just another cathedral? The famed Duomo in Milan. Photo by Martin Anselmo on Unsplash

Doge’s Palace, Venice

Venice’s Palazzo Ducale is the third most-visited tourist attraction in the country and arguably one of the best-preserved traces of the ancient Venetian Republic’s power. 

But the palace isn’t everyone’s cup of tea – at least judging from its reviews.

“When you go inside, there’s nothing to see except a lot of paintings on the ceilings and high on the walls. The paintings are impressive but very samey,” one reviewer wrote.

READ ALSO: What’s the difference between Italy’s city taxes and new ‘tourist tax’?

“Really boring,” complained another, saying that the rooms were “bland” and “the view never got any better”. 

Other visitors said they were disappointed with some of their tour guides’ choices.

One wrote: “Our guide took pleasure in telling about people being tortured here. It was a bit grizzly [sic]. Personally I would give the place a miss.” 

Tourists sit under the archway of the Doge's Palace in Venice

The Doge’s Palace in Venice, which some visitors found abit “samey”. Photo by Marco BERTORELLO / AFP

Pompeii 

Even the Pompeii archaeological site, which consists of the ruins of a city buried under volcanic ash following the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, has its fair share of detractors.

A reviewer described the site as being “poorly paved street after poorly paved street of pretty much the same old same old terraced house over and over and over and over”.

Another said: “I really don’t get what the hype is about.

“It’s not even that ancient since they had to build so many structures around it to keep it standing. Even the freaking pillars didn’t make it (some barely did I guess).”

One reviewer even went as far as saying it was the “worst place” he’d ever visited, mentioning he had “too much ground to cover in sweltering heat” and he “should have stayed at the nice beaches of Vico Equense”. 

Trevi Fountain, Rome

A prime example of Italian Baroque aesthetics, the Trevi fountain is one of Rome’s most widely recognised symbols worldwide, but not all visitors are impressed by it.

“It splashes and splashes. It spurtles and flows. It fountains and gurgles and is as romantic as my oldest pairs of smelly socks,” wrote one reviewer, who concluded they felt “let down”.

Tourists around Rome's Trevi Fountain

Tourists around Rome’s Trevi Fountain in March 2024. Photo by Alberto PIZZOLI / AFP

That said, many reviewers expressed appreciation for the fountain’s architecture, but complained that their visit was ruined by hordes of fellow tourists. These complaints are far from unjustified given the attraction’s long-standing overcrowding issues

One reviewer suggested that “packing a pair of 8 foot stilts” may be the only way to “ensure a satisfying visit to the Trevi”.

Another called the attraction a “claustrophobia mecca” that’s “nearly impossible to deal with because of the thousands of pushy, sweaty, rude and large tourists”.

Have you seen a surprising review of an Italian landmark? Are there any Italian sights you think are overrated? Let us know in the comments section below.

SHOW COMMENTS