SHARE
COPY LINK

PARIS

Paris votes in favour of €18-per-hour parking fees for SUVs

Paris voters on Sunday backed a proposal to triple parking charges on hefty SUV-style cars, according to official results from city hall.

Paris votes in favour of €18-per-hour parking fees for SUVs
Paris' city hall organised a vote on February 4 on the creation of a special parking fee for heaviest and most polluting cars and SUVs. Photo by Dimitar DILKOFF / AFP

Parisians voted 54.55 percent in favour of charging cars weighing 1.6 tonnes or more €18 per hour for parking in the city centre, or €12 further out.

But only 78,000, or 5.7 percent, of the 1.3 million eligible voters bothered to vote at the 39 voting stations set up around the French capital.

Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo, of Parti Socialiste, hailed a “clear choice of Parisians” in favour of a measure that is “good for our health and good for the planet”.

Fully electric cars will have to top two tonnes to be affected, while people living or working in Paris, taxi drivers, tradespeople, health workers and people with disabilities will all be exempt.

Hidalgo announced on Monday morning that the new parking charges will apply from September 1st. 

“It’s an ecological issue, but it’s also a societal issue, and it’s about how cities need to evolve in a changing environment,” said Gregoire Marchal, a 43-year-old cinema distributor, after voting in favour of the measure at a polling station in Paris’s 10th district.

“I do have a car, but I think it’s great that we can ask ourselves the question and change our behaviour,” he added.

Not all voters were happy.

“I’m sick of all these diktaks from Mrs Hidalgo,” said Jeannine, 75, in the wealthier 8th district, where more of the cars appear to be SUVs.

Hidalgo herself voted at a school in the city’s 15th district a little before 6pm local time.

On Hidalgo’s watch, the capital city has pedestrianised many streets, including the banks of the river Seine, and built a network of cycle lanes in an effort to discourage driving and reduce harmful transport emissions.

Environmental group WWF has dubbed SUVs an “aberration”, saying they burn 15 percent more fuel than a classic coupe and cost more to build and purchase.

City hall has further pointed to safety concerns about taller, heavier SUVs, which it says are “twice as deadly for pedestrians as a standard car” in an accident.

The vehicles are also singled out for taking up more public space – whether on the road or while parked – than others.

Paris officials say the average car has put on 250 kilogrammes since 1990.

Hidalgo, whose city will this summer host the 2024 Olympics, has led a long-term drive to drastically reduce car use in the centre.

But drivers’ groups attacked the scheme, Yves Carra of Mobilite Club France dismissing the “SUV” classification as “a marketing term” that “means nothing”.

He argued that compact SUVs would not be covered by the measures, which would however hit family-sized coupes and estate cars.

Right-wing opposition figures on the Paris council say this imprecise targeting of the referendum “shows the extent of the manipulation by the city government”.

Even among fuel-burning cars, “a new, modern SUV… does not pollute more, or even pollutes less, than a small diesel vehicle built before 2011”, said drivers’ group 40 millions d’automobilistes.

France’s Environment Minister Christophe Béchu told broadcaster RTL the SUV surcharge amounted to “a kind of punitive environmentalism” – even if drivers should “opt for lighter vehicles”.

Hidalgo’s transport chief David Belliard, of the Green party, says around 10 percent of vehicles in Paris would be hit by the higher parking fees, which could bring in up to €35 million per year.

Paris’s anti-SUV push has not gone unnoticed elsewhere in France, with the Green party mayor in Lyon planning a three-tier parking fee for both residents and visitors from June.

The last city referendum in Paris, on banning hop-on, hop-off rental scooters from the capital’s streets, passed in an April 2023 vote – but only drew a turnout of seven percent.

Member comments

  1. This referendum is a farce. Only 5 % bothered to get up to vote last Sunday.
    Having said that, SUV have no place in Paris or in any city.
    French drivers are already pretty dangerous on the road and these huge cars give them a feeling of superiority that does nothing to calm them.
    It would have been better if more people had voted.
    The funny bit is that the foreign press seems to like the result when here journalists can’t stop bitching about it claiming this is a basic right !!!

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

TRAVEL NEWS

EES: Why is the UK-France border such a problem for the EU’s new biometric passport checks?

The EU's proposed new system of passport checks known as the Entry & Exit System will apply to all of the Bloc's external borders - so why are most of the warning lights coming from the France-UK border? And is it really Brexit related?

EES: Why is the UK-France border such a problem for the EU's new biometric passport checks?

The EU’s new Entry & Exit System of enhanced passport checks – including biometric checks like facial scans and fingerprints – is due to come into effect later this year.

You can read a full explanation of how it works HERE and see our frequently-asked-questions section HERE, including information for non-EU citizens who are resident in an EU country and the system for dual nationals.

EES will apply to the whole of the EU and Schengen zone and will apply at external borders, but not for travel within the Schengen zone itself (eg between France and Germany or Italy and Switzerland).

You can hear the team at The Local discuss the latest developments on EES on the Talking France podcast – listen here or on the link below

The EU has plenty of external borders from land borders such as the Greece-Albania border to the airport frontiers that occur when, for example, an American flies into Italy.

But while several nations have expressed concern that their infrastructure is not ready, the loudest and most dire warnings are coming about the border between France and the UK.

READ ALSO Travellers between France and UK could face ’14-hour queues’ due to new passport system

So why is this border such a problem?

The problems with the UK France border are threefold; volume of traffic, space and juxtaposed borders.

Volume of traffic – This is simply a very busy border crossing, about 60 million passengers a year cross it by ferry, plane, Channel Tunnel or Eurostar. For people travelling from the UK, especially those crossing by car on the ferry or Channel Tunnel, France is simply a stopping point as they head into Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands or to Spain or Italy.

Around 70 percent of those passengers are British, which means they will have to do the EES checks.

READ ALSO Could the launch of EES be delayed again?

Space – The second problem is to do with the space that is required to process all those passengers as several crossing points – especially the Port of Dover and the embarkation area at London St Pancras – are quite crowded and for various reasons don’t have room to expand.

Extra infrastructure is required to complete EES pre-registration checks and this will be difficult to physically fit into some crossing points – for context the EES pre-registration area for the Channel Tunnel at Coquelles covers 7,000 square metres.

Juxtaposed border controls – the UK-France border is also unique within the EU because of its juxtaposed border controls, which are the result of a bilateral agreement between France and the UK known as the Le Touquet agreement.

Juxtaposed border controls exist at Paris Gare du Nord and London St Pancras for those using the Eurostar, the ports of Dover and Calais and the Channel Tunnel terminals at Folkestone and Coquelles – these mean that when you leave the UK you get your passport checked by both British and French authorities, and then there are no passport checks when you arrive in France – and vice versa.

This means that if there is a hold-up at one border control it has a knock-on effect on the other and means that very long queues can quickly build up – as has been seen several times at the Port of Dover since Brexit.

The Brexit effect

Part of the problem with the UK-France border is that discussions about EES began while the UK was still a member of the EU, and then the conversation changed once it had left.

However, even when it was in the EU, the UK never joined the Schengen zone so there were always passport checks for travellers between France and the UK.

The difference is that EU citizens are exempt from EES – so those 70 percent of passengers crossing that border who are British would have been exempt from the changes had it not been for Brexit.

French and other EU citizens remain exempt and will not have to complete EES pre-registration once the system is up and running. 

Therefore EES would have only applied to a tiny minority of travellers entering the UK – for example American tourists arriving into London – which logistically would be a much easier challenge, especially for the Port of Dover whose customers are overwhelmingly either British or EU nationals.

What about Ireland?

Had it not been for Brexit, the UK would have been in a similar situation as Ireland is now – since Ireland is a member of the EU but not the Schengen zone.

Under the new system Ireland will not use the EES system at its own borders and will carry on manually stamping passports.

However, anyone who has an Irish passport will be exempt from EES when they are travelling within Europe – for dual nationals this only applies of they are travelling on their Irish passport.

READ ALSO Your questions answered about the EU’s new EES system

SHOW COMMENTS