SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Why Brits in Italy say they’ve been ‘hung out to dry’ over €2K healthcare fee

After Italy hiked minimum annual healthcare fees to €2,000 from January, The Local's British readers covered by post-Brexit rules say a lack of clarity and communication about how this applies to them has made the increase much worse.

Why Brits in Italy say they've been ‘hung out to dry' over €2K healthcare fee
Medical staff members (Photo by Miguel MEDINA / AFP)

Italy’s foreign residents who make voluntary contributions into the Italian healthcare system (Servizio sanitario nazionale, or SSN) until last year paid a minimum fee of €387 per year. 

But from the beginning of 2024, this minimum has shot up by more than sixfold to €2,000, meaning that volunteers, people on elective residency visas and people over the age of 65 on family reunification visas will all have to pay this much – or more – to use the SSN.

While the steep price hike is hard for anyone to swallow, for some British residents based in Italy before the Brexit transition period ended, there is added frustration at being told they have to pay the charge when their healthcare should be free.

Under European law they are protected by the post-Brexit Withdrawal agreement (WA) which states that their conditions within Italy should remain the same as before.

READ ALSO: Trouble proving residency rights leaves Brits in Italy paying €2k health charge

And those who have been legally resident in Italy for more than five years are eligible for permanent residency, which brings with it the right to free healthcare.

But some British citizens covered by the WA say they’re having problems proving their residency rights, or are dealing with varying official interpretations of the rules – which risks leaving them without healthcare unless they pay the €2,000 charge.

“I feel shocked and horrified. I don’t know how they’ve justified this. Where is the official line from the Ministry of Health for us WA beneficiaries? Why are we not getting clarification?” retiree Vanessa* in Lucca, Tuscany, tells The Local.

“It feels unjust. It’s like we’ve been hung out to dry.”

Vanessa is a permanent resident in Italy as she has been living here since 2016. But she says her local authority is interpreting the rules differently.

After writing emails back and forth to her local Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) she was told she had to pay the €2,000 minimum or be left without healthcare.

“My nerves keep going,” she says. “I had a biopsy just before Christmas and I’m under control measures. It’s hanging over my head and I can’t even stick up for myself as my rights have not been communicated to me.”

She said even her doctor was confused as to why she’s been told she has to pay despite being a permanent resident.

The main issue, she believes, is the lack of communication and clarity on the policy among officials. She was told by her ASL the new budget law superseded the  Withdrawal Agreement in terms of residency rights, therefore affecting her access to services.

READ ALSO: Q&A: What you need to know about Italy’s €2,000 healthcare fee

“It seems like everything you do here is a struggle. It’s like they all have their own interpretation and they don’t read the whole thing,” she says.

“It’s inconsistent, there’s no clarity, and there is a certain amount of prejudice towards us. There has to be some kind of breakthrough.”

The lack of communication is also an issue for Liguria-based Claire Francis. She’s waiting on further clarification from the health ministry as to whether the new measures will affect her husband (who she is a carer for) and herself. 

“I still feel incredulous that an increase on the fees being charged is even legal given the massive uplift,” she says. “It feels deliberately discriminatory and unjust, especially with the lack of information and clarity surrounding it.

“It’s been implemented across Italy in a haphazard way depending on the interpretation by the various comune and ASL offices.”

Jim Grant who lives in the south of the country in Ostuni says his main concern is the huge fee increase over a short period of time, and he is among those who are now considering opting for private healthcare. 

“A gradual increase over a couple of years, with some advance notice, would have been more palatable,” he says. “In the years we’ve been here, my wife and I have not used any state medical services at all.

“The only health intervention was when I had hearing issues and I paid for this to be dealt with privately as, bizarrely, it was cheaper than the ASL voluntary contribution. I shall continue along the private route until I am eligible, if we stay in Italy.”

Greg* has also found that obtaining permanent residency is also another hurdle to obtaining healthcare, along with the new charges.

He, like Vanessa, has permanent residency rights and therefore the same healthcare rights as Italian nationals. However, a lack of communication between the comune and ASL has prevented this from happening.

“We are really frustrated with this as it happens every year and we both have serious health issues which require regular medication,” he says. “In my case,  I unfortunately have blood cancer and need to visit the hospital every month for tests.

“We aren’t being treated fairly.”

*Names have been changed in this article to protect the identity of the interviewees.

Have you got an opinion on the new healthcare charge? Do you agree or disagree with the opinions expressed in this article? Leave a comment below to share your thoughts or get in touch with us by email.

 

Member comments

  1. This is all very well reporting on the usual disfunction across the various Italian regions BUT what is being done about this by either or both the Italian and British Government/Consulate.
    Obviously the new budget cannot supercede the WA without Brussels and Whitehalls approval which it would never get. Is it possible for you to make the necessary representations to eg the British consulate please ? – I’m sure it will get sorted in the fullness of time but in the meantime people are suffering

    1. Hi, campaigners and groups such as Beyond Brexit are doing fantastic work on this issue. We’ll continue to report on the progress they make.

      Thanks for reading,
      – Clare

  2. The following comment was submitted by Clarissa Killwick of Beyond Brexit:

    “It is very important for Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries in Italy to understand how much we are on our own now. People can’t just sit and wait for something to be done about WA breaches. Dedicated support from the UK government to help those having difficulties stopped a long time ago. Embassy resources have been reduced. Furthermore, there is no independent monitoring of WA implementation as there is in the UK.

    Our group is run by three volunteers (with day jobs!) with no funding whatsoever and we are, by no means, able to reach everyone, for example, those not on social media. Yes, we constantly raise these issues with the embassy but, more than three years on after the end of transition, problems are ongoing.

    Individuals also need to make as much noise as they can which could take many forms. Talk to your sindaco, make a complaint to URP of the public office you are having a problem with. Contact the embassy, using the contact form on the gov.uk Living in Italy page and persist even after you get the standard answer suggesting you get a lawyer. Write to your UK MP. Make an official complaint to the European Commission. Use any contacts you have such as journalists or politicians. Do you know anyone in ANCI or ANUSCA?

    We all need to do what we can to raise awareness of the very particular problems that WA beneficiaries face in Italy. The current very serious issue of some people being charged the new minimum of €2000 for SSN voluntary contributions rather than €0 because they cannot prove their permanent residency is a clear example of how much damage can be caused by lack of clear guidance from the top – to all the public offices that deal with us. That is what we are asking for.”

  3. Demanding change from the top as Clarissa Killwick appears to be doing is to completely misunderstand how Italy – a nation of separate historical identities and loyalties – functions. ‘They do things differently here’ applies from the comune level upwards. Go local, it’s the only way. Also, it’s more fun.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

EES PASSPORT CHECKS

How will the new app for Europe’s EES border system work?

With Europe set to introduce its new Entry/Exit biometric border system (EES) in the autumn there has been much talk about the importance of a new app designed to help avoid delays. But how will it work and when will it be ready?

How will the new app for Europe's EES border system work?

When it comes into force the EU’s new digital border system known as EES will register the millions of annual entries and exits of non-EU citizens travelling to the EU/Schengen area, which will cover 29 European countries.

Under the EU Entry/Exit System (EES), non-EU residents who do not require a visa will have to register their biometric data in a database that will also capture each time they cross an external Schengen border.

Passports will no longer be manually stamped, but will be scanned. However, biometric data such as fingerprints and facial images will have to be registered in front of a guard when the non-EU traveller first crosses in to the EU/Schengen area.

Naturally there are concerns the extra time needed for this initial registration will cause long queues and tailbacks at the border.

To help alleviate those likely queues and prevent the subsequent frustration felt by travellers the EU is developing a new smartphone app.

READ ALSO: What will the EES passport system mean for foreigners living in Europe?

The importance of having a working app was summed up by Uku Särekanno, Deputy Executive Director of the EU border agency Frontex in a recent interview.

“Initially, the challenge with the EES will come down to the fact that travellers arriving in Europe will have to have their biographic and biometric data registered in the system – border guards will have to register four of their fingerprints and their facial image. This process will take time, and every second really matters at border crossing points – nobody wants to be stuck in a lengthy queue after a long trip.”

But there is confusion around what the app will actually be able to do, if it will help avoid delays and importantly when will it be available?

So here’s what we know so far.

Who is developing the app?

The EU border agency Frontex is currently developing the app. More precisely, Frontex is developing the back-end part of the app, which will be made available to Schengen countries.

“Frontex is currently developing a prototype of an app that will help speed up this process and allow travellers to share some of the information in advance. This is something we are working on to support the member states, although there is no legal requirement for us to do so,” Uku Särekanno said in the interview.

Will the 29 EES countries be forced to use the app?

No, it is understood that Frontex will make the app available on a voluntary basis. Each government will then decide if, when and where to use it, and develop the front-end part based on its own needs.

This point emerged at a meeting of the House of Commons European scrutiny committee, which is carrying out an inquiry on how EES will impact the UK.

What data will be registered via the app?

The Local asked the European Commission about this. A spokesperson however, said the Commission was not “in a position to disclose further information at this stage” but that travellers’ personal data “will be processed in compliance with the high data security and data protection standards set by EU legislation.”

According to the blog by Matthias Monroy, editor of the German civil rights journal Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP the Frontex app will collect passengers’ name, date of birth, passport number, planned destination and length of stay, reason for travelling, the amount of cash they carry, the availability of a credit card and of a travel health insurance. The app could also allow to take facial images. It will then generate a QR code that travellers can present at border control.

This, however, does not change the fact that fingerprints and facial images will have to be registered in front of a guard at the first crossing into the Schengen area.

So given the need to register finger prints and facial images with a border guard, the question is how and if the app will help avoid those border queues?

When is the app going to be available?

The answer to perhaps the most important question is still unclear.

The Commissions spokesperson told The Local that the app “will be made available for Schengen countries as from the Entry/Exit System start of operations.” The planned launch date is currently October 6th, but there have been several delays in the past and may be another one.

The UK parliamentary committee heard that the prototype of the app should have been ready for EU member states in spring. Guy Opperman, Under-Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport, said the app will not be available for testing until August “at best” and that the app will not be ready in time for October. The committee previously stated that the app might even be delayed until summer 2025.

Frontex’s Särekanno said in his interview: “Our aim is to have it ready by the end of the summer, so it can then be gradually integrated into national systems starting from early autumn”.

READ ALSO: How do the EES passport checks affect the 90-day rule?

Can the system be launched if the app is not ready?

Yes. The European Commission told The Local that “the availability of the mobile application is not a condition for the Entry/Exit System entry into operation or functioning of the system. The app is only a tool for pre-registration of certain types of data and the system can operate without this pre-registration.”

In addition, “the integration of this app at national level is to be decided by each Schengen country on a voluntary basis – as there is no legal obligation to make use of the app.”

And the UK’s transport under secretary Guy Opperman sounded a note of caution saying the app “is not going to be a panacea to fix all problems”.

When the app will be in use, will it be mandatory for travellers?

There is no indication that the app will become mandatory for those non-EU travellers who need to register for EES. But there will probably be advantages in using it, such as getting access to faster lanes.

As a reminder, non-EU citizens who are resident in the EU are excluded from the EES, as are those with dual nationality for a country using EES. Irish nationals are also exempt even though Ireland will not be using EES because it is not in the Schengen area.

Has the app been tested anywhere yet?

Frontex says the prototype of the app will be tested at Stockholm’s Arlanda Airport, in Sweden. Matthias Monroy’s website said it was tested last year at Munich Airport in Germany, as well as in Bulgaria and Gibraltar.

According to the German Federal Police, the blog reports, passengers were satisfied and felt “prepared for border control”.

This article is published in cooperation with Europe Street News.

 
SHOW COMMENTS