SHARE
COPY LINK

BERLIN

‘Fear and anger’: How Berlin’s schools are impacted by Mideast war

From the distribution of anti-Israel pamphlets to a pupil-teacher fight over a Palestinian flag, some schools in Berlin, home to the largest Palestinian diaspora in Europe, are struggling to approach the Israel-Hamas war.

new school Ruetli
Archive photo shows the Rütli high school in Neukölln. Photo: picture-alliance/ dpa/dpaweb | Db Sophie Wolfbauer

The education ministries of Germany’s 16 states swiftly urged schools to “respond appropriately and sensitively” in the classrooms to the deadly attack by Hamas gunmen in Israel and the war it triggered.

Nowhere was the task more delicate for teachers than in Berlin’s Neukölln district, where a significant Arab community lives and where violent pro-Palestinian protests have erupted since the conflict began.

“A large number of our students are Muslim, many of Arab origin, and some of Palestinian origin,” said Clara Debour, a teacher at the district’s Rütli school.

On the Monday after Hamas gunmen stormed into Israel and killed at least 1,200 people, mostly civilians, according to Israeli authorities, the “students went through all kinds of emotions: fear, indignation, anger, sadness, and for some, a kind of satisfaction,” Debour said.

Close to the school, on Sonnenallee, a group called Samidoun distributed sweets to celebrate the attack in which about 240 people were also taken hostage.

The German government has since banned the organisation, with the interior minister saying it “spread anti-Israel and anti-Jewish propaganda under the guise of a ‘solidarity organisation’ for prisoners”.

At another school in the area, “many assumed that the attack was revenge that was deserved,” said a teacher, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Tensions have continued to rise with the relentless Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip and subsequent ground invasion, which according to the Hamas-run health ministry has killed more than 11,100 people, most of them civilians.

‘Historical responsibility’

With the conflict ostensibly entering the schoolyards, the German government has ramped up its warnings over growing anti-Semitism and the urgency to address the issue in schools.

On Thursday, on the anniversary of the Nazi Kristallnacht pogrom that began the Holocaust, Chancellor Olaf Scholz urged schools to ensure they conveyed the sense of “historical responsibility” that Germany has towards Jews.

READ ALSO: ‘Never again’ is now: Scholz vows to protect country’s Jews

“It is an absolute necessity… for those who come from countries where the Holocaust is not talked about, or is talked about in a completely different way,” he said.

Kristallnacht, on November 9th-10th, 1938, was an outbreak of orchestrated violence that saw Jews murdered, synagogues torched and Jewish-owned businesses destroyed, and which ushered in the Nazis’s slaughter of six million European Jews during World War II.

After a fight broke out between a teacher and a student who had brought a Palestinian flag in to a school near Debour’s, Berlin has imposed a ban on “any demonstrative action or expression of opinion that can be understood as advocating or approving of the attacks against Israel”.

This includes the wearing of the Palestinian scarf or using stickers with slogans like “free Palestine”.

Berlin authorities have also distributed advice to schools in a letter on how to address the issue.

Three messages need to be conveyed to students during lessons on the conflict, it said: Israel has the right to defend itself, the fight against terrorism must be in line with international law, and Jews in Germany are not responsible for Israeli policy.

They are also offering training on how to broach the war in class, and about the ways in which young people gather information about it on social media.

“Adolescents are overwhelmed by the images they see. Many of their parents watch Al Jazeera, which shows more deaths than German television,” said Debour.

Many students understand Germany’s responsibility towards Jews but are angry at the government’s stance, which they believe is too close to Israel’s, she said.

The other teacher who spoke on condition of anonymity said that through discussions, the students were made to “understand that the repercussions would go against the well-being of all and that the distribution of sweets by Samidoun would benefit the German far right.”

Debour also voiced concern about the spread of misinformation, especially on TikTok, and seeks to debunk it in class.

Students may end up stuck “in their media bubble,” she said, adding that some “may risk radicalisation”.

By Céline Le Prioux

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

CLIMATE CRISIS

INTERVIEW: ‘Failed climate policies are fuelling far-right politics in Germany’

Alt-right political parties tend to oppose environmental protections, but is there a connection between their political success and climate policy failures? Author and thought-leader Sandrine Dixson-Declève explains why Germany may be having a ‘1930s moment’, and why the next elections are gravely important.

INTERVIEW: 'Failed climate policies are fuelling far-right politics in Germany'

It’s understood that far-right and populist political parties tend to either downplay the realities of climate change, or block progressive policies that would try to mitigate its impacts. But the link between failed climate policies and the recent rise of populist parties is rarely addressed.

Speaking as a panellist at the Green Tech Festival in Berlin on Thursday, climate policy thought-leader Sandrine Dixson-Declève voiced concern that poor climate and economic policies are fuelling the popularity of far-right politics in Germany and across Europe. 

Co-president of the Club of Rome, Dixson-Declève works to promote policies that she believes would help secure a sustainable future for humanity. Such policies are laid out in the book Earth for All: A Survival Guide for Humanity, that she co-authored.

The Local spoke with Sandrine Dixson-Declève about Germany’s climate policy failures, and why she thinks the upcoming European elections are of the utmost importance.

The shortcomings of Germany’s ‘Energiewende’ had serious political consequences

Having been a contributor and advisor to Germany’s Energiewende (energy transition), Dixson-Declève has followed German politics and environmental policy for years.

“I believe that one of the biggest mistakes was that we politicised energy policy in Germany from the outset,” she told The Local, adding, “Merkel actually accepted the big green push to pull out of nuclear, which actually created a big mess.”

Germany’s anti-nuclear energy movement dates back to the 19070s, and led to the foundation of the Green party. Under Merkel’s leadership, a plan was adopted to phase out nuclear power with the last three nuclear power plants taken offline in 2023.

But losing nuclear power as an energy source came with some serious consequences.

“The first big mess was the continued burning of coal,” Dixson-Declève explained. “The second big mess was Nord Stream 2, and that led to the invasion of Ukraine…because it gave Putin power.”

Still, she wouldn’t suggest that Germany try to revive its nuclear power now: “I believe that Germany needs to really think through the next steps.”

READ ALSO: ‘Nuclear power is a dead horse in Germany’: Scholz rejects reopening plants 

Protestors run past riot police

A wave of protestors break through police lines at Lützerath. Open pit coal mining in west Germany destroyed most of the Hambach Forest, as well as dozens of villages such as Lützerath. At both sites massive citizen protests were met with brutal police evictions. Photo by Paul Krantz.

Energy efficiency is the missing piece to Germany’s climate plans

How to build up renewable energy infrastructure is at the centre of most discourse around curbing fossil fuel use, but using the energy we have more efficiently arguably deserves more immediate attention.

“The other missing link, which no one talks about, is energy efficiency,” Dixson-Declève said. “Actually the best energy is the energy you don’t use. That is unsexy, and that is why energy efficiency hasn’t been taken up the way it should have been since 2010.”

While working on climate and energy plans in 2010, she says she came across a study that said Europe could wean itself off of Russian gas just by putting energy efficiency requirements in place for buildings.

In 2022 the European Commission finally began to take this idea seriously when Germany and Europe suddenly needed to replace Russian gas imports, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Another massive energy saver that has been politicised for all the wrong reasons in Germany is heat pumps.

According to Eurostat data, about half of all energy consumed in the EU is used for heating and cooling, and most of that energy comes from fossil fuels. Heat pumps are significantly more efficient than boilers and allow for greater use of renewable energy sources.

But when Economy Minister Robert Habeck led an effort to promote heat pumps by banning new fossil-powered heating systems, conservative and far-right parties jumped on the issue as if it were an attack on personal freedoms. 

“As environmentalists, we need to get better at translating the environmental narrative into something that resonates with people,” said Dixson-Declève. 

READ ALSO: Reader question – How do I install a heat pump in my German property?

A unified coalition government that is serious about climate protections might have better communicated to people that heat pumps would ultimately save them money: “They should have been enabled in a way that truly assisted people in getting the heat that they needed in an affordable way at the right time.”

‘I am very scared we are in a 1930s moment’

Whereas the coalition government has largely failed to communicate to voters how environmental policies will improve their lives and save them money, conservative and far-right parties have done extremely well at hijacking the narrative. 

The European People’s Party (EPP – the EU’s largest conservative party), for example, is particularly adept at using citizens’ economic concerns to block environmental policies.

Having analysed the EPP’s manifestos, Dixson-Declève notes that they acknowledge the need to mitigate climate change, but say that protections cannot cost. 

“I think the EPP has done a very good job both of putting in fear of the greens, [as if] they’re only going to think about green climate policies and not about social policies [whereas] we’re here to think about you.”

Sandrine Dixson-Declève with Earth for All

Sandrine Dixson-Declève holds up a copy of the book ‘Earth for All’ alongside two of the book’s co-authors. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Wolfgang Kumm

Germany’s far-right parties tend to use similar messaging to try and convince voters that they will better improve the lives of citizens than the current coalition parties have. 

READ ALSO: Why are the far-right AfD doing so well in German polls?

Nearly 100 years ago, the National Socialist (Nazi) party succeeded in drumming up major support along similar lines.

Speaking as a panellist at Berlin’s Green Tech Festival, when asked how she thought European politicians were doing on climate issues, Dixson-Declève described them as deer in the headlights, adding, “I am very scared we are in a 1930s moment”.

“I think that in the 1930s we didn’t see Hitler coming, we didn’t read the tea leaves,” she told The Local, adding that in the present moment, “people are suffering. When people suffer, they look to anything, any message that’s going to make them feel like that next leader is going to help them.” 

She also suggests that we can’t count on the youth vote to save us, citing Argentina and Portugal as two places where young voters have actually pushed politics to the right recently.

READ ALSO: A fight for the youth vote: Are German politicians social media savvy enough?

“This is a tipping moment politically, and if we’re not careful, it could explode in our faces,” said Dixson-Declève. “We need to get as many people to vote this year [as possible]. It’s an absolutely fundamental vote, alongside the United States, in order to make sure that we don’t slide to the right across Europe.”

SHOW COMMENTS