SHARE
COPY LINK

CLIMATE CRISIS

Austrian ski gondola maker goes urban as planet gets warmer

Austrian company Doppelmayr is well known for making gondolas for ski resorts, but its workshop is increasingly building cable cars for congested cities as climate change has opened up new markets.

Austrian ski gondola maker goes urban as planet gets warmer
Tourist are seen in the cabin of the Pfanderbahn cable car network, manufactured by Austrian ropeway company Doppelmayr. Photo: ARND WIEGMANN/AFP.

A growing number of urban areas are adopting the cleaner, space-saving mode of transport: Doppelmayr’s cable cars now glide over London, Mexico City and La Paz.

Urban mobility currently accounts for 20 percent of sales for the world’s biggest cable car maker as cities seek to decarbonise their public transport systems.

“We have evolved with our customers,” said Reinhard Fitz, Doppelmayr’s head of international business development.

The 130-year-old company, which built its first ski lift in 1937, has yet to see a drop in demand from mountain resorts, Fitz said. “But climate change will of course cause demand to shift,” he said.

‘Innovative solution’

Doppelmayr’s urban business began to take off about 15 years ago. Its biggest urban project to date — holding the Guinness World Record for the largest public-transit cable-car system — is a 33-kilometre (20.5-mile) network of 10 ropeway lines connecting Bolivia’s capital La Paz with another metropolis, El Alto.

Its strongest market for urban mobility is Latin America, but the company is hoping to expand into Asia.

More than 80 cities and towns worldwide have already adopted aerial tramways, urban engineering expert Hanane Bengualou told AFP.

Costing less than seven million euros per kilometre, cable cars are three times cheaper than tramways, Bengualou said.

“It’s an innovative solution that uses up very little land and is quick to deploy, as it doesn’t require any major work (on site),” she said.

The Paris region is among Doppelmayr’s newest customers, with a 4.5-kilometre (2.8-mile) ropeway project that will connect two suburbs, giving 20,000 residents access to the capital’s subway system.

Scheduled to open in 2025, the “Cable C1” line will offer an 18-minute travel time between Villeneuve-Saint-Georges and Creteil.

“Cable transport is clean, quiet and regular,” said Laurent Probst, director-general at Ile-de-France Mobilites, which oversees public transport in the Paris region.

The costs associated with cable cars are far lower and they can be quickly installed, making them the ideal solution for traffic-clogged regions, he said.

In addition, they can “cross obstacles” such as roads or train tracks, giving people a commute free of traffic jams, he added.

‘Attached to conventional systems’

Bengualou noted that cable cars also offer a cleaner option, as transport accounts for 35 percent of CO2 emissions in France.

However, opposition by residents and complex administrative procedures have obstructed their development, with France’s third-biggest city, Lyon, being forced to abandon its project in 2022.

Since cities are less prone to strong winds than open mountain areas, lighter single-cable technology is usually good enough for urban areas, though population density and other obstacles bring challenges.

Policymakers are often unaware that cable cars — still widely associated with ski resorts — are an option for urban transport, Fitz said.

“We hope examples like the Paris region” will bring awareness, he said, adding that “people are still very attached to conventional systems”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Laughing stock of Europe’: What’s the new crisis to hit Austria’s coalition government?

Austria's environment minister went against the government's will and voted in favour of controversial EU legislation. Chancellor Nehammer now accuses the minister of 'abuse of office'.

'Laughing stock of Europe': What's the new crisis to hit Austria's coalition government?

It’s the latest crisis between centre-right ÖVP and its junior Green coalition partners. This one will make its way up to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), according to statements given by Chancellor Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) on Monday (17).

This is due to the fact that Austria’s Environment Minister Leonore Gewessler broke with coalition partners to help pass a controversial EU-level law. “I know I will face opposition in Austria on this, but I am convinced that this is the time to adopt this law,” Gewessler told reporters.

The Federal Chancellery promptly responded to Gewessler’s unilateral action: “Austria will bring an action for annulment before the ECJ,” it said. Her vote was “not in line with the domestic will and therefore could not be cast in accordance with the constitution”, the Chancellor’s office said.

READ ALSO: Europe warned it must do more to deal with climate crisis

Gewessler will be charged with suspected abuse of office, ÖVP Secretary General Christian Stocker announced in a press release.

“There is a suspicion that Leonore Gewessler is acting unlawfully and knowingly against the clear guidelines of the Constitutional Service and against the constitution with her approval of the ordinance – this constitutes abuse of office,” Stocker said.

What was voted?

At the core of the discussion is a controversial EU law known as the “EU nature restoration law”. The legislation mandates the restoration of at least 20 percent of the EU’s land and sea areas by 2030 to restore all ecosystems in need by 2050. This landmark bill aims to address the decline of Europe’s natural habitats, a significant portion of which are currently assessed as being in poor condition.

The legislation includes specific targets for various ecosystems, including peatlands, forests, grasslands, wetlands, rivers, lakes, and coral beds. Member states are required to improve at least 30 percent of these habitats by 2030, with this target increasing to 60 percent by 2040 and 90 percent by 2050.

The conservative ÖVP party has been against the regulations, consistently reasserting Austria’s abstention vote for two years now since the EU Commission presented the package that included the “nature restoration law.” 

But now, Gewessler’s rogue vote was crucial for the legislation to pass. Austria’s vote, which was a mystery until the very end, was decisive.

Although a clear majority of states voted in favour anyway, the necessary quorum of 65 percent of EU residents was only achieved because of Austria. In the end, 66.07 percent of the EU population voted in favour of the law.

Can Gewessler vote against the Chancellery decision?

That’s complicated, and the courts will decide. 

The Chancellor argues that Austria had already been notified to abstain, a position based on “a uniform opinion of the Regional Governments (Bundesländer), binding for the Federal Government under Austrian constitutional law, as well as the lacking consensus within the Austrian Federal Government ”. 

He means that Austrian states have also agreed not to back the proposal. However, in May, two states, Vienna and Carinthia, pulled out of this vote, as Der Standard reported. This makes it unclear, even among constitutional lawyers, whether there is still a “uniform opinion” and whether Gewessler would be bound by it, the report added.

READ ALSO: Why Vienna is a haven for wild animals – and where you can find them

Criticism from SPÖ and far-right

The SPÖ and FPÖ criticised Gewessler and Nehammer for their actions on Monday. The two had made Austria “the laughing stock of Europe”, said SPÖ climate spokesperson Julia Herr in a press statement. 

“What we are currently experiencing is basically the continuation of the last five years of black-green, only with tougher strikes because the election is approaching,” she said.

Meanwhile, far-right FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl demanded that Nehammer take responsibility for Gewessler’s “ideology-driven solo effort”. In his opinion, the law meant the “death” of domestic agriculture and the security of supply with domestic food.

The major environmental NGOs were very pleased with the approval of Gewessler’s EU nature restoration law: Greenpeace spoke of a “milestone” in a press release, the WWF saw “historic progress”, and Global 2000 saw an “important tool in the fight against the biodiversity crisis and the climate crisis”.

SHOW COMMENTS