SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

REFERENDUMS IN SWITZERLAND

Climate, taxes and Covid: What’s at stake in Switzerland’s June 18th referendums

In the first of the three rounds of referendums scheduled to be held in 2023, the Swiss will weigh in on three issues.

Climate, taxes and Covid: What’s at stake in Switzerland's June 18th referendums
The Swiss will vote on three issues on June 18th. Photo: AFP

These are the three issues on the June 18th ballot:

Covid-19 Act

This act was voted on, and approved by the majority of the population, in November, 2021, when the pandemic was still on-going. 

Even though the last health measures were lifted more than a year ago, voters will have to decide again on various federal provisions  — especially pertaining to border measures in the event of a pandemic, the protection of vulnerable people, and the promotion and development of treatments for the coronavirus.

According to the government, which is urging the ‘yes’ vote, “it is hard to say with any certainty how [the disease] will develop. The possibility that dangerous variants of the virus will emerge again cannot be ruled out.”

Given this uncertainty, the parliament has extended the period of the Act’s validity until mid-2024.

However, opponents of the measure — organisations called Friends of the Constitution and  Mass-Voll — are opposing the extension of the law, claiming it would allow the government to arbitrarily re-introduce “discriminatory measures” like the Covid certificate

Climate and Innovation Act

The second issue is related to climate, particularly the target of zero greenhouse gas emissions in Switzerland by 2050, thanks to the government funding of 2 billion francs over 10 years for the replacement of fossil fuels. 

Switzerland imports around three quarters of its energy, which means that all the mineral oil and natural gas consumed in the country come from abroad.

However, the government argues that “these fossil fuels will not be available indefinitely and they place a heavy burden on the climate. In order to reduce environmental pollution and dependence on other countries, the Federal Council and Parliament want to reduce the consumption of oil and gas. At the same time, the aim is to produce more energy in Switzerland.”

If the voters approve this bill, Switzerland will aim to become climate neutral by 2050, by financially incentivising the replacement of oil, gas, and electric heating by climate-friendly technologies.

The opponents of the law — The Swiss-German Federation of Property Owners and Swiss People’s Party among them — spoke out against the climate law, claiming that if the government’s proposal will be approved, it would cause a massive increase in electricity needs and, consequently, in electricity prices.

READ ALSO: Are the Swiss finally going to get serious on tackling the climate crisis?

Taxation of international companies

Negotiated by nearly 140 countries around the world, the reform of the tax law aims to establish a minimum rate of 15 percent on international corporations — higher than Switzerland’s current tax rate.

However, Switzerland’s has committed itself to comply with this rule.

Even though it would mean Switzerland might lose its edge as a tax-friendly business location, the Federal Council and Parliament want to follow the other countries by implementing this minimum taxation for large international groups of companies (for all other companies, nothing would change).

While the Federal Council is recommending that voters approve this measure, some MPs reject the plan, as most of the revenue would go to just a few cantons, such as Zug and Schwyz,  which offer competitive taxation rates, while other regions will not benefit.

READ ALSO: Why does the canton of Zug have Switzerland’s lowest taxes?

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

REFERENDUMS IN SWITZERLAND

What’s at stake in Switzerland’s ‘physical integrity’ referendum?

On June 9th, Swiss voters will decide on whether the country’s residents should have the right to refuse procedures that would impact their ‘physical integrity.’ What exactly does this mean?

What's at stake in Switzerland's 'physical integrity' referendum?

Four issues in total will be brought to the ballot box on June 9th.

Among the most controversial topics are the two initiatives seeking to curb the cost of the obligatory health insurance — one by capping the premiums at 10 percent of income, and the other by  providing a ‘brake’ on health costs, which should evolve according to the economy and wages.

READ ALSO: How Switzerland’s two crucial health insurance referendums could impact you 

But there are two other proposals on the agenda as well.

One, titled “For the freedom of physical integrity” was launched by the STOP compulsory vaccination committee of a group called Swiss Freedom Movement.

While it may seem a bit outdated today, this citizen-driven initiative saw the light of day during the Covid pandemic, when the Federal Council had to take some drastic measures — including quarantine and confinement —  to protect the population from the virus and prevent the healthcare system, especially hospitals, from being saturated.

This, along with the vaccines introduced at the end of 2020, prompted the group to start colecting enough signatures to challenge these measures in a referendum.

What exactly is it about?

The initiative demands “protection of the body” against interference by the state.

It specifies that the consent of the person concerned must be obtained for invasive procedures that may affect their “physical or mental integrity”, which basically means any medical interventions, like vaccinations, but in practice it goes much further (read more about this below).

The federal government, cantonal health authorities, and health experts in general, recommend that voters reject this proposal, for several reasons.

One is that physical and mental integrity are already protected under the Constitution, which guarantees the right to ‘self-determination’ in matters of health and life in general.

As for vaccinations, whether against the coronavirus or any other diseases, nobody can be forced to be immunised against their will in Switzerland.

Another argument against the initiative is that, if it is passes, it would hinder measures that the government would have to implement to protect the population in case of another pandemic.

But there would be non-medical consequences as well

Since the initiative doesn’t specifically refer to medical interventions but covers generally any actions by the federal government, cantons and communes that involve physical contact, it implies that police would no longer be able to arrest a suspect without his or her authorisation — as such actions would involve physical contact that could impact a person’s mental state.

According to the government, the initiative focuses on individual rights and ignores the overriding public interest.

The initiative therefore goes well beyond vaccination and other health matters, it said.

The fourth issue: electricity supply

Supplying Switzerland with sufficient energy has become a challenge due to International conflicts and the restructuring of the European power grid.

Therefore, a new law sets the ground for Switzerland to rapidly produce more electricity from renewable energy sources such as water, sun, wind, and biomass. 

Opponents, however, say that the legislation will be detrimental to environmental causes like the protection of nature, and urge the ‘no’ vote.

SHOW COMMENTS