SHARE
COPY LINK

TRAVEL NEWS

OPINION: Trains are in fashion so why is rail travel across Europe still so difficult?

Would you prefer to travel across Europe by train rather than plane this summer? It’s not nearly as simple as it should be, especially given the urgency of the climate crisis, explains specialist Jon Worth.

People in a sleeper train
Passengers in a couchette cabin. Photo: Anne-Christine POUJOULAT / AFP

Buried away in the latest report by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change about the changes needed in different sectors to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions is this startling graphic (below) – it is in the transport sector where the costs to decarbonise are lowest, and even have cost savings associated with them.

So with spring blossom in the trees and thoughts turning to planning summer holiday trips, why not look for a greener route to the sun – by taking the train rather than the plane?

In terms of the public debate, trains are back in fashion.

On the back of Greta Thunberg’s efforts to shame those who fly, and to push greener alternatives instead, media from The New York Times to the BBC are discussing the renaissance of long distance travel by train in Europe, especially night trains.

One railway company – Austria’s ÖBB – has seized the moment and has ordered a fleet of 33 new 7 carriage night trains, the first of which will be on Europe’s tracks from December this year.

The argument for night trains is a simple one, namely that by travelling at night you save yourself a night in a hotel at your destination, and passengers are happy to make a longer trip while they are asleep than they would during the day – when passengers normally will not spend more than 6 hours in a train.

The problem is that beyond ÖBB’s plans comparatively little is happening in long distance cross border night trains in Europe.

There are dozens of further connections where night trains would make sense – think of routes like Amsterdam-Marseille or Cologne to Warsaw for example – but we cannot hope that the Austrians will run those. The European Commission conservatively estimated in December 2021 that at least 10 more night train routes, over and above those planned by ÖBB, would be economically viable, and running those lines would need at least 170 new carriages to be ordered. But so far no operator has been tempted.

The main players in European rail – Deutsche Bahn, Renfe, SNCF and Trenitalia – have no interest in night trains, and even only limited interest in cross border rail at all.

More profitable national daytime services are their focus. The French and Italian governments have been making noises to push SNCF and Trenitalia respectively to run more night time services but – you guessed it – only on national routes.

A few small private players have sought to run night services – Sweden’s Snälltåget and Amsterdam-based European Sleeper for example, but they have struggled to scale.

All of this is on top of the headaches that cross border rail in Europe has faced for years, namely the difficulty of booking tickets on international trains (sometimes two or more tickets are needed), timetables that are not in sync if you have to change train at a border, and lack of clear information and compensation if something goes wrong. Even finding out what trains run is often a headache, as no complete European railway timetable exists.

The EU nominated 2021 as the European Year of Rail with the aim of drawing attention to what rail can do in Europe, but the year closed with scant little progress on any of this multitude of thorny problems – in the main because the railway companies themselves do not want to solve them.

Helping intrepid cross border travellers find their way around these practical barriers has become a kind of cottage industry in the social media era.

Communities of sustainable transport nerds of which I am a part on Facebook and Twitter help each other to find the best routes and cheapest tickets, and the venerable Man in Seat 61 website acts as a kind of FAQ for international rail. 

There’s nothing quite like waking up on a summer morning and seeing the sun on the Mediterranean or the wooded slopes of the Alps out of the window of a night train. But travel experiences like that are not nearly as simple or mainstream as they should be – and it is high time the railway industry stepped up.

Are you hoping to travel across Europe by train instead of plane but finding it difficult to organise? Feel free to get in touch and with Jon’s expertise we’ll try to help you. Email [email protected]

Jon Worth is a Berlin-based blogger who specialises in European train travel. You can his original post on this subject HERE.

Member comments

  1. Yes, I agree, much more should be done here. I used to use take Eurostar to Paris, change stations, and then the sleeper to Chur via Zürich. But these days, as a frequent traveller between London, Zürich and Chur, the complexity of purchasing a rail ticket, plus the cost, make it really impractical. One big improvement would be to the ability to purchase a ticket, in a single transaction, from London to Zürich/Berlin/Milan … Only the most dedicated (and wealthy) commuter is likely to persevere with the train option, when you can purchase a return flight within a few minutes and for perhaps £150 return.

  2. I’ve lived and studied in Germany and been all over Europe by rail. The worst European train is still far, far better than the best train in the USA.

  3. EU as an organization is unable to get anything done other than talking. If there was a REAL political will we could get rid of polluting short-haul flights but that will never happen.

  4. It is price that governs. Trains are too expensive. I have been told that flying is cheap because the fuel is virtually untaxed. If that is accurate it is a policy decision that should change. Trains should be cheap, flights more expensive.

  5. I have had great success with Rail Planner. It’s very easy to plan a trip to different EU countries on the app. I have a few complaints such as the ambiguouity around bus subsitutions, but it is really quite good, and I would highly recommend it. The tickets may be a bit pricey, I will admit.

  6. I love train travel. However cheap air travel can be it has become an absolute nightmare. Stripping on and off half our clothing and jewelry, going through a security queue that can turn into a lesson in Fascism on dime. The lack of service of any kind because the airlines were deregulated a long time and the airline workers got screwed along with us. I used to love flying. No longer.
    So this article really interests me. Yes, it seems obvious that train travel is what many people want now and politically it is being thwarted. Even here in Switzerland we voted to beef up the train system a few years ago and now they have laid off heaps of personnel, the trains run late, cancel with no warning during commute hours, no more travel agents in the big stations, the little stations decommissioned and their website is useless for any info other than a time schedule and buying a ticket.
    This is so sad. I really hope journalists take this subject up and get some momentum and better travel services and night trains, dealing with luggage, making things affordable and dealing with logistics between countries. Trains are the future.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

TRAVEL NEWS

REVEALED: The German airport with the cheapest long-haul flights

Prices for long-haul flights have fallen by an average of two percent compared to 2023. But which German airport has the cheapest deals?

REVEALED: The German airport with the cheapest long-haul flights

Flights from Germany to popular long-distance destinations are cheaper now than they were in 2023, according to analysis by the price comparison website CHECK24.

Having compared direct flights to 20 popular destinations, CHECK24 found that long-haul flights are two percent cheaper on average this year. 

In terms of real price, this amounts to an average of €868 for round-trip flights on long-haul routes in 2024, compared to €888 in 2023.

Long-haul flights are defined as taking more than six hours. Coming from Germany, most flights within Europe wouldn’t be considered long-haul.

Which German airport has the cheapest airfares?

Germany’s largest airport, Frankfurt Airport (FRA) offers the most non-stop connections to long-haul destinations.

It also tends to have the cheapest airfares, according to CHECK24’s analysis.

Flights from Frankfurt to Dubai cost an average of eight percent less (€737) than from Munich (€804), for example.

Direct flights to Tokyo are also cheaper from Frankfurt Airport than from Munich on average –  €1,340 and €1,409, respectively.

For direct flights to Newark on the US East Coast, passengers can save about 10 percent by flying from Frankfurt as opposed to Munich.

But interestingly, for some other connections to the United States, it can be cheaper to fly from Munich. Flying direct to Los Angeles, for instance, is 14 percent cheaper from Munich on average.

The CHECK24 report doesn’t mention price comparisons with other airports in Germany, but beyond Munich and Frankfurt, Germany’s airports don’t offer many long-haul direct flights.

For example, from Berlin, the only regular long-haul flights at the moment are to New York, Beijing, Dubai and Miami. Other far-away destinations are more often reached from here with stop-overs at larger airports, including Frankfurt and Munich.

READ ALSO: Budget airline Ryanair to cut flights from Berlin

Düsseldorf Airport (DUS), which is Germany’s next largest, only offers a few long-haul flights, and the only long-distance route if offers every day is to Dubai.

In most cases, Munich and Frankfurt have cheaper airfares to these locations due to the volume of flights departing from those locations. 

But of course, before you rush to book your next flight from Frankfurt, you’d want to factor in the cost of a long-distance train ticket if you live in another city.

Which destinations are cheapest now?

CHECK24’s analysis suggests that ticket prices to China have fallen the most, by 35 percent compared to 2023.

Return flights to Brazil and Costa Rica also fell significantly, by about 16 percent.

Also connections to India and Sri Lanka are nine percent cheaper on average this year  – followed by connections to Japan and Cuba, which are eight percent less on average.

On the other hand, prices for routes to Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, Thailand and Vietnam have all increased in the past year.

Prices for flights to the US have remained stable.

SHOW COMMENTS