SHARE
COPY LINK

MILITARY

Did Russian jets carry nuclear weapons into Swedish airspace?

Swedish broadcaster TV4 reported on Wednesday that the Russian jets that violated Swedish airspace this month were carrying nuclear weapons. But defence experts in Sweden are sceptical.

Defence experts are sceptical about the statements that the Russian planes who flew in Swedish air space carried nuclear weapons.
Defence experts are sceptical about the statements that the Russian planes who flew in Swedish air space carried nuclear weapons. Photo: FLYGVAPNET/TT

According to an article published by TV4 on Wednesday, two of the Russian planes that had to be escorted away from airspace near Gotland on March 2nd were equipped with nuclear weapons. It was picked up by international newspapers such as the Daily Mail and the Evening Standard. 

According to anonymous sources quoted by the broadcaster, the pilots of the two Sukhoi 24 attack aircraft, which were accompanied by two Sukhoi 27 fighter jets, had made sure that the Swedish pilots could see the weapons. 

Although the Swedish Armed Forces would not comment on the information, Carl-Johan Edström, the head of Sweden’s airforce told the broadcaster that the incursion had been done deliberately to send a signal to Sweden. 

“We see it as a deliberate act, which is extremely serious when you consider that this is a country currently at war,” he told the broadcaster.

When contacted by the TT newswire on Thursday, Edström denied that Swedish pilots had seen nuclear weapons on the jets

“If we had an increased threat against Sweden which could be linked to this event or to other events we would have informed people about it,” he said. 

The Swedish Armed Forces has not yet commented on which weapons the planes were carrying. But defence experts told Sweden’s TT newswire they were sceptical of claims they were carrying nuclear weapons.

“My judgement from the pictures is that the planes look completely unarmed”, said expert Andreas Hörnedal from the Swedish Defence Research Agency. 

He said Kh-32 cruise missiles, which can be nuclear-armed, cannot anyway be carried on a Sukhoi 24. 

“These are huge missiles that weigh 5.5 tonnes and are carried on a different plane”, he said. “This was an obvious factual error, which, on the other hand, can happen when it comes to technological details”. 

It’s still unclear how the information reached TV4, but it could well have been Russian misinformation, Hörnedal told TT.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

MILITARY

Sweden set to vote on controversial Defence Cooperation Agreement with the US

The Swedish parliament is set to vote on a controversial defence deal with the United States, with supporters dismissing fears from critics that it could lead to the deployment of nuclear weapons and permanent US bases on Swedish soil.

Sweden set to vote on controversial Defence Cooperation Agreement with the US

The Defence Cooperation Agreement (DCA) is a major step for a country that in March ended two centuries of neutrality to join Nato.

Signed by Stockholm and Washington in December, the deal would give the US access to 17 military bases and training areas in Sweden, and allow the storage of weapons, military equipment and ammunition in the country.

Opponents say the agreement should state outright that the Scandinavian country will not allow nuclear weapons on its territory.

“The agreement has no limits,” argued Daniel Helldén, co-leader of the opposition Green Party, which together with the Left Party opposes the DCA agreement.

“It opens up nuclear weapons on Swedish soil… And it is so vaguely written that the government could even allow them in peacetime,” he told SR public radio on Monday.

“We’re going to be a target for nuclear weapons. We’re going to have 17 bases where the Americans can store material,” he added.

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson’s centre-right minority government, propped up by the far-right Sweden Democrats, has insisted the deal respects Swedish sovereignty.

“Sweden is a sovereign nation and it will always be Sweden that decides what type of weapons we allow,” Defence Minister Pål Jonson told SR.

“Parliament has already agreed that we will never need permanent bases or nuclear weapons on Swedish territory and that was specified in our Nato accession,” he added.

For the bill to pass on Tuesday, it has to win a 75 percent majority of the Riksdag legislature’s 349 MPs.

The vote is to be held after 5.15pm, Stockholm time.

The Left and Green parties, which both voted against Sweden’s Nato membership, together hold just 42 seats – not enough to block the agreement’s adoption on their own.

Two Left Party MPs called the government’s handling of the agreement “not just naive, but downright foolish”, in an op-ed article in daily Aftonbladet on Sunday.

They said the DCA makes Sweden less safe because “US defence and security policy is based on nuclear weapons.

“Nuclear weapons are a threat to mankind. That the government hasn’t demanded any guarantees against such a brutal weapon of mass destruction is terrifying,” they wrote.

The Swedish Peace and Arbitration Association, one of the biggest critics of the move, said two successive Swedish governments insisted during the Nato application process that Sweden would have the same stance on nuclear weapons as neighbouring Denmark and Norway.

“But unlike Norway’s and Denmark’s DCA agreements, there is no clause in Sweden’s agreement against nuclear weapons being brought into or placed in Sweden,” the association’s head Kerstin Bergeå wrote in another op-ed.

In addition, Finland, which joined Nato in April 2023, “has a national law prohibiting nuclear weapons on Finnish territory and Finland’s DCA agreement refers to this law.”

A similar Swedish clause would “strengthen the Nordic region and contribute to a joint de-escalation vis-a-vis Russian nuclear weapons,” Bergeå said.

Nukes in wartime?

Sweden’s prime minister made headlines last month when he opened the door for the possibility of nuclear weapons in Sweden during wartime.

“In a war situation it’s a completely different matter, (it) would depend entirely on what would happen,” Kristersson told SR.

The two Left MPs wrote: “That’s an incredible statement and is totally the opposite of what the Swedish people think and what Sweden has long stood for.”

Bergeå questioned whether Sweden would be able to put a brake on the United States.

“An agreement based solely on confidence is not enough in important matters such as these,” she said.

Defence minister Jonson has said Sweden needs to strengthen its international cooperation “to defend our freedom and democracy”.

“With the DCA, Sweden can receive early, swift and effective military support from the United States in a deteriorating security situation,” he said last month.

“The agreement acts as a deterrent and is stabilising. It reduces the risk of war breaking out and makes Sweden safer,” Jonson said.

SHOW COMMENTS