SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Explained: Why France is angry with Britain over migrant crossings

The war of words between France and the UK over migrant crossings seems to be getting increasingly ill-tempered. Here's what each side is complaining about.

French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin shakes with law enforcement officers during a visit to northern France.
French interior minister Gérald Darmanin visits law enforcement officers in northern France. Photo by FRANCOIS LO PRESTI / AFP

What is happening?

A total of more than 1,000 migrants crossed the channel from France to England on Friday and Saturday, just the latest in hundreds of crossing staged by migrants and asylum seekers desperate to reach the UK.

Generally undertaken in highly dangerous conditions in small boats, the crossing represents the final stage of the journey for people who have travelled thousands of miles from countries including Afghanistan and Syria to reach the UK, going through Europe and then crossing by sea to the UK.

They usually aim to cross at the shortest point, from the northern French coastline around Calais towards Dover and the south coast of England, just 33km away.

This is a long-standing issue and over the years France and the UK have tried various different joint approaches to tackling the problem.

A total of 15,400 people attempted to cross the Channel in the first eight months of this year, a increase of 50 percent over the figure for the whole of 2020, according to French coast guard statistics.

Why the row?

In short, the UK believes that France is not doing enough to stop the crossings, while France says the UK has broken its promise to finance anti-trafficking measures.

Under an agreement reached in July, Britain agreed to finance border security in France to the tune of €62.7 million.

However according to British media reports, British Home Secretary Priti Patel in September threatened to withhold the money in the light of the record numbers of migrants arriving from France.

France, meanwhile, says that the promised money has not been paid.

Patel’s opposite number, France’s interior minister Gérald Darmanin, said: “The (British) government has not yet paid what it promised us.

“We call on the British to keep their promise of financing since we are maintaining the border for them”.

What is France doing?

Over the past three months France has stopped 65 percent of attempted crossings by illegal immigrants, up from 50 percent, the interior minister said.

The French side has hired more gendarmes, purchased more technological equipment and thereby “succeeded in greatly reducing migratory pressure”, he added.

“France has held the border for our British friends for over 20 years,” said Darmanin. France is “an ally of Britain” but “not its vassal”, he said.

The northern coastline is just one aspect of border policing for France, which also has to deal with migrant crossings on its Mediterranean coast and over land.

READ ALSO: French police cause misery for migrants in Calais

So what next?

On a practical level, Darmanin said that he had received assurances from the director of the European border surveillance agency Frontex, that it will be prepared by the end of the year to monitor the coastal area, notably through aerial surveillance. 

However the row between France and the UK is also about politics and the post-Brexit fallout.

Darmanin on Saturday called for the start of negotiations for a migration treaty between the European Union and Britain.

“We need to negotiate a treaty, since Mr (Michel) Barnier did not do so when he negotiated Brexit, which binds us on migration issues,” the interior minister said, adding that France will champion the project when it takes over the EU’s rotating presidency in January.

Barnier, who is now running for president in France, was the EU’s Brexit negotiator during the fraught talks on a deal to cover relations with the UK after it left the European Union.

READ ALSO: France warns Britain against ‘blackmail’ over migrant crossings

Member comments

  1. If France can’t secure its own borders perhaps they should ask Border Force UK to do it for them. They certainly need to do something as allowing the present free-for-all makes a mockery of the visa system.

    1. It’d be interesting to watch UK Border Force officers trying to patrol the high Alpine or Pyrenean borders in winter … I wonder how many of them have ever seen a snow chain in their lives …

        1. You were talking about ‘France securing its borders’ with ‘borders’ in the plural. Apart from the UK border, France obviously borders Spain and Italy.

  2. The French are doing there best against what is a mass invasion.
    The problem for the French is that they are part of Shengan area – so migrants enter the EU and walk into France as there are no borders
    The EU cannot secure their borders – once migrants have crossed they can go where they like
    Migrants can claim asylum in the country of their choice – the issue to me is – how can applications be processed without them crossing the water in a dingy.
    Those who have successful applications can then cross safely as a foot passenger on a ferry

    1. It’s plain nonsense to claim they can go where they want. All migrants are in France illegally. Consequently, it’s for the French authorities to arrest them and then either grant asylum or deport them. The migrants don’t want to claim asylum in France because that would stop them applying in Britain and it would seem the French don’t want to force the issue.

  3. I watched French television on the 11.10.20211 and it showed French police watching as migrants were loading a dingy did not do anything. One migrant said the police don’t try to stop them. The French expect to get paid for this. Rosie

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

CRIME

Germany mulls expulsions to Afghanistan after knife attack

Germany said Tuesday it was considering allowing deportations to Afghanistan, after an asylum seeker from the country injured five and killed a police officer in a knife attack.

Germany mulls expulsions to Afghanistan after knife attack

Officials had been carrying out an “intensive review for several months… to allow the deportation of serious criminals and dangerous individuals to Afghanistan”, Interior Minister Nancy Faeser told journalists.

“It is clear to me that people who pose a potential threat to Germany’s security must be deported quickly,” Faeser said.

“That is why we are doing everything possible to find ways to deport criminals and dangerous people to both Syria and Afghanistan,” she said.

Deportations to Afghanistan from Germany have been completely stopped since the Taliban retook power in 2021.

But a debate over resuming expulsions has resurged after a 25-year-old Afghan was accused of attacking people with a knife at an anti-Islam rally in the western city of Mannheim on Friday.

A police officer, 29, died on Sunday after being repeatedly stabbed as he tried to intervene in the attack.

Five people taking part in a rally organised by Pax Europa, a campaign group against radical Islam, were also wounded.

Friday’s brutal attack has inflamed a public debate over immigration in the run up to European elections and prompted calls to expand efforts to expel criminals.

READ ALSO: Tensions high in Mannheim after knife attack claims life of policeman

The suspect, named in the media as Sulaiman Ataee, came to Germany as a refugee in March 2013, according to reports.

Ataee, who arrived in the country with his brother at the age of only 14, was initially refused asylum but was not deported because of his age, according to German daily Bild.

Ataee subsequently went to school in Germany, and married a German woman of Turkish origin in 2019, with whom he has two children, according to the Spiegel weekly.

Per the reports, Ataee was not seen by authorities as a risk and did not appear to neighbours at his home in Heppenheim as an extremist.

Anti-terrorism prosecutors on Monday took over the investigation into the incident, as they looked to establish a motive.

SHOW COMMENTS