SHARE
COPY LINK

CRIME

France’s police threatened with lawsuit by human rights groups over ‘racist’ identity checks

Six NGOs filed a formal notice to the French government on Wednesday demanding an end to what they said was racial profiling by police through identity checks, or else face a class action.

France's police threatened with lawsuit by human rights groups over 'racist' identity checks
A protester holds up a placard reading 'the police assassinates' during one of several anti-police brutality protests in Paris over the summer of 2020. Photo: AFP

The class action is a first in France, carried out by six international and French human rights organisations including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

The NGOs accused French police of engaging in “longstanding and widespread ethnic profiling that constitutes systemic discrimination”.

“Despite incontrovertible evidence that French police have for many years engaged in systematic discrimination in carrying out identity checks, and commitments by successive governments to address the problem, nothing has changed,” the NGOs said in the formal notice sent to the French government, giving them four months to respond.

The warning letter – 350 pages thick – included testimonies of people saying to have been victims of ethnic profiling during identity checks in nine French cities including Paris, Lyon and Toulouse, as well as police officers denouncing identity checks as “useless”.

Identity checks specifically and police racism more broadly have been matters of fierce debate for years in France, which gained strength in the summer of 2020 after George Floyd died at the hands of police in the United States.

Thousands of protesters in France disregarded Covid-19 health advice and took to the streets following the killing to protest against racially motivated police brutality, which they said was a French problem too.

READ ALSO: Who is Adama Traore and why are there protests across France in his name?

 

Police in France have long vehemently denied accusations of institutional racism, both generally and through identity checks. One union decried the lawsuit as unjust and biased.

“It's a bit too easy to denounce systemic control on the basis of spurious, truncated, very biased reports,” Alternative Police Union wrote in a press statement.

Denouncing the class action “political and dogmatic manoeuvre” by actors known for their “anti-police” attitudes, Alternative Police said it was an attempt to turn the interior ministry against the police just as France embarked on national conversations to improve their relationship with the country's citizens.

ANALYSIS: How did France's relationship with its own police get so bad?

 

Police officers in France threw their handcuffs on the ground in protest after the French government considered to ban a controversial “chokehold” tactic in June 2020. Photo: AFP

President Emmanuel Macron launched the talks, known in France as “Beauvau de la sécurité”, after three police officers were caught on video brutally beating up a Black musician in Paris.

The NGOs demanded that, during these talks, the government “tackle the specific problem of discriminatory identity checks and its deep causes, in a serious way to end these abuses, in line with France’s obligations under national and international law.”

“Deep structural reforms are needed to address this systemic discrimination,” they said. 

The French Republic was founded on principle of universalism that effectively bans public institutions from collecting data of ethnicity or religion.

Enacted to protect minorities from discrimination, critics have said for years that this “colour-blind” policy has become counterproductive, causing the state to be blind to racism rather than skin colour.

ANALYSIS: Is France really 'colour-blind' or just blind to racism?

French police have been at the forefront of the debate, as their identity checks are based on a person's appearance, but – due to the principle of universalism – they do not keep records of ethnicity of the people checked.

A study carried out in 2009 in Paris by the Open Society Justice Initiative and French state research body CNRS showed that black people were six times more likely to be stopped for their ID than whites.

People with features seen as “Arab” were eight times more likely to be asked to show their papers.

In a more recent report in 2017, the French rights ombudsman said that young men “seen as black or Arab” were 20 times more likely to be asked for ID than young white men.

One man included in the NGOs letter said to have experienced ethnic profiling by the police repeatedly since he turned 16, “sometimes three times a day.”

During a recent stop, he said, the police “violently pinned me up against the wall. One of the officers touched my private parts. Then he hit me in the stomach and called me a ‘dirty Arab’.”

Rights groups have long called for people targeted by ID checks to be given a receipt which they could produce to avoid being asked repeatedly for their papers.

The prime minister, interior minister and justice minister – all specifically targeted by the NGOs – have four months to respond to their demands.

Member comments

  1. Is it any wonder that Poland and Hungary balk at following the EU’s diktat on immigration? What country, given a fresh start, would opt for such out of control and unmanageable levels of immigration from countries with cultures so unsuited to the European way of life?

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

PARIS 2024 OLYMPICS

Factcheck: Is France really trying to ban speaking English at the Paris Olympics?

A resolution by a group of French MPs to 'say non to English at the Paris Olympics' has generated headlines - but will athletes and visitors really be required to speak French?

Factcheck: Is France really trying to ban speaking English at the Paris Olympics?

In a resolution adopted on Thursday, France’s Assemblée Nationale urged organisers of the 2024 Paris Games, as well as athletes, trainers and journalists, to use French as much as possible.

Annie Genevard, the sponsor of the resolution from the right-wing Les Républicains party, expressed alarm to fellow MPs that “the Olympic Games reflect the loss of influence of our language.”

The French MP’s resolution has garnered headlines, but does it actually mean anything?

Citing examples of English slogans in international sport, she added: “The fight for the French language … is never finished, even in the most official spheres.

“Let’s hope that ‘planche a roulettes’ replaces skateboard and ‘rouleau du cap’ point break (a surfing term), but I have my doubts.”

She’s right to doubt it – in French the skateboarding event is ‘le skateboard’, while the new addition of break-dancing is ‘le breaking‘.

But what does this actually mean?

In brief, not a lot. This is a parliamentary resolution, not a law, and is totally non-binding.

The Games are organised by the International Olympic Committee, the Paris 2024 Organising Committee and Paris City Hall – MPs do not have a role although clearly the Games must follow any French domestic laws that parliament passes.

The French parliament has got slightly involved with security issues for the Games, passing laws allowing for the use of enhanced security and surveillance measures including the use of facial recognition and drone technology that was previously outlawed in France.

So what do the Olympic organisers think of English?

The Paris 2024 organisers have shown that they have no problem using English – which is after all one of the two official languages of the Olympics. The other being French.

The head of the organising committee Tony Estanguet speaks fluent English and is happy to do so while official communications from the Games organisers – from social media posts to the ticketing website – are all available in both French and English.

Even the slogan for the Games is in both languages – Ouvrir grand les jeux/ Games wide open (although the pun only really works in French).

In fact the Games organisers have sometimes drawn criticism for their habit (common among many French people, especially younger ones) of peppering their French with English terms, from “le JO-bashing” – criticism of the Olympics – to use of the English “challenges” rather than the French “defis”.

The 45,000 Games volunteers – who are coming from dozens of countries – are required only to speak either French or English and all information for volunteers has been provided in both languages.

Paris local officials are also happy to use languages other than French and the extra signage that is going up in the city’s public transport system to help people find their way to Games venues is printed in French, English and Spanish.

Meanwhile public transport employees have been issued with an instant translation app, so that they can help visitors in multiple languages.

In short, visitors who don’t speak French shouldn’t worry too much – just remember to say bonjour.

Official language  

So why is French an official language of the Olympics? Well that’s easy – the modern Games were the invention of a Frenchman, the aristocrat Pierre de Coubertin, in the late 19th century.

Some of his views – for example that an Olympics with women would be “impractical, uninteresting (and) unaesthetic” – have thankfully been consigned to the dustbin of history, but his influence remains in the language.

The International Olympic Committee now has two official languages – English and French.

Official communications from the IOC are done in both languages and announcements and speeches at the Games (for example during medal ceremonies) are usually done in English, French and the language of the host nation, if that language is neither English nor French.

SHOW COMMENTS