SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Why does France want to appoint an ‘envoy’ to explain itself to Muslim countries?

French president Emmanuel Macron is said to be considering appointing a 'special envoy' to explain his ideas on tackling radical Islam to Muslim states - but why would he be considering this idea?

Why does France want to appoint an 'envoy' to explain itself to Muslim countries?
Anti-French protests in Yemen. Photo: AFP

What is the proposal?

This is really only a whisper of an idea at present, reported by diplomatic sources, so we have no detail on what such a role might entail, but it comes at the end of a turbulent few weeks for France with protests and calls for boycotts of French products in several Muslim countries.

Does France need to explain itself?

Macron is reportedly concerned that his views on to tackle radical Islam in France and ideas have been misinterpreted and purposefully distorted.

There is certainly a lot of anger towards France from some parts of the Muslim world.

The Iranian press has published caricatures of Macron as the devil and his effigy was burned in Bangladesh where around 50,000 protesters took to the streets. Anti-France street demos also took place in several other countries including Yemen.

There have also been calls to boycott French products, spear-headed by Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, with whom Macron has frequently clashed on political and human rights issues. Erdogan earned rebukes from across Europe when he said Macron should have his mental wellbeing checked by doctors.

What has caused the anger?

There are broadly two things that have sparked anger – a speech that Macron gave on October 2nd laying out plans to crack down on Islamic extremism and 'separatism' in France and some of the words uttered by the president and some other ministers in the aftermath of the beheading of schoolteacher Samuel Paty on October 16th by an 18-year-old radicalised Islamist.

Macron's speech referred to Islamism being a problem, rather than Islam itself. In it he laid out measures including a crackdown on foreign funding of mosques and closer scrutiny of the curriculum at private schools and an almost end to home-schooling. These are at the ideas stage and the bill still needs to be presented and debated in the French parliament.

Importantly in the speech he also acknowledged that France had created its own form of 'separatism' by failure to ensure diversity and economic or social mobility in certain parts of the country – notably the deprived banlieues on the outskirts of cities. Many of the people who have committed acts of terror on French soil have been second-generation immigrants who grew up in the poor and tense suburbs of French cities.

He also said that French state schools should teach more Arabic which provoked anger on the right and far-right in France.

A supermarket in Jordan displaying a boycott of French products. Photo: AFP

So where is the misunderstanding?

Taking the second incident first. France – and the rest of the world – was shocked at the brutal beheading in the street of a schoolteacher who had shown Charlie Hebdo magazine's cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed to his civics class as part of a discussion on freedom of speech. It later emerged that this had followed an online hate campaign waged by the father of one of Samuel Paty's pupils (who it turned out wasn't even in the class concerned that day).

At the memorial service, a visibly emotional Macron vowed that France 'would not give up religious cartoons' and would continue to defend the values of a secular republic. 

Those words about “not giving up the cartoons” seemed to be the crucial words in provoking anger in Muslim countries, much of which was whipped up by Islamist parties or leaders like Turkey's Erdogan – perhaps to deflect attention from internal issues.

Macron has since clarified that he understands the offence caused to Muslims by these cartoons, and underlined that Charlie Hebdo is a private enterprise, and the publication of the cartoons was not a state-sponsored exercise – but that the state does defend the right to freedom of speech.

On the subject of his speech, some people seem to have misunderstood – or perhaps mistranslated – the difference between Islamism – extremist views – and Islam.

The British newspaper the Financial Times has removed an Op-ed piece that appears to have made this error, and Macron has written a piece for the paper laying out his views.

READ ALSO France is not fighting Islam, only Islamist extremism, says Macron

But while Macron himself has adopted a notably measured tone, the pronouncements of some of his ministers have also been causing concern and anger.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin gave a bizarre TV interview where he declared himself 'shocked' that supermarkets have aisles for ethnic food products, while education minister Jean-Michel Blanquer has launched an attack on what he described as Islamo-gauchisme (Islamic leftism) in French universities. Both of their actions have been strongly criticised by many within France.

What next?

At present Macron seems to be taking on the envoy role himself, an addition to the article for the FT he has also given a long interview to Al-Jazeera TV in which he sought to explain more clearly France's position.

Earlier this week a group of leading French Muslim intellectuals wrote an article for Le Monde calling for a halt to the boycott.

 

Whether this is enough to cool the anger and whether France chooses to go ahead with its envoy idea remains to be seen.

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

ECONOMY

S&P downgrades French credit rating in blow to Macron

Ratings agency Standard & Poor's downgraded France's credit score on Friday citing a deterioration in the country's budgetary position, a blow to Emmanuel Macron's government days before EU parliamentary elections.

S&P downgrades French credit rating in blow to Macron

In a statement, the American credit assessor justified its decision to drop France’s long-term sovereign debt rating from “AA” to “AA-” on concerns over lower-than-expected growth.

It warned that “political fragmentation” would make it difficult for the government to implement planned reforms to balance public finances and forecast the budget deficit would remain above the targeted three percent of GDP in 2027.

The S&P’s first downgrade of France since 2013 puts the EU’s second-largest economy on par with the Czech Republic and Estonia but above Spain and Italy.

The announcement will sting for Macron, who has staked a reputation as an economic reformer capable of restoring France’s accounts after low growth and high spending.

The risk of a ratings downgrade had been looming for several quarters, with the previous “AA” assessment given a “negative outlook”.

The surprise slippage in the public deficit for 2023 to 5.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) instead of the expected 4.9 percent did not play in the government’s favour.

France’s general government debt will increase to about 112 percent of GDP by 2027, up from around 109 percent in 2023, “contrary to our previous expectations”, the agency added.

Responding to the downgrade decision, Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire reaffirmed the government’s commitment to slashing the public deficit to below three percent by 2027.

“Our strategy remains the same: reindustrialise, achieve full employment and keep to our trajectory to get back under the three percent deficit in 2027,” he said in an interview with newspaper Le Parisien, insisting that nothing would change in the daily lives of the French.

Le Maire claimed the downgrade was primarily driven by the government’s abundant spending during the Covid pandemic to provide a lifeline to businesses and French households.

The main reason for the downgrade was because “we saved the French economy,” he said.

Government critics offered a different rationale.

“This is where the pitiful management of public finances by the Macron/Le Maire duo gets us!” Eric Ciotti, head of the right-wing Republicans party, wrote on social media platform X.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen called the Macron administration’s handling of public finances “catastrophic” and denounced the government as being “as incompetent as they are arrogant”.

A credit downgrade risks putting off investors and making it more difficult to pay off debt.

Earlier this year, influential ratings agencies Moody’s and Fitch spared handing France a lower note.

S&P also maintained its “stable” outlook for France on Friday on “expectations that real economic growth will accelerate and support the government’s budgetary consolidation”, albeit not enough to bring down its high debt-to-GDP ratio.

“S&P’s downgrading of France’s debt simply reflects an imperative that we are already aware of: the need to continue restoring our public finances,” Public Accounts Minister Thomas Cazenave wrote in a statement sent to AFP.

SHOW COMMENTS