SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS

These are the next steps for Sweden’s future migration laws

A Swedish parliament committee set up to work out a new migration policy for Sweden will not put forward an overall proposal for a new law, after negotiations between the parties broke down. So what happens next?

These are the next steps for Sweden's future migration laws
Sweden's current temporary migration law is set to run out next year. Photo: Marcus Ericsson/TT

All Sweden's major parties have agreed that migration law needs an overhaul, and last year a Migration Committee, with representatives from all eight parliamentary parties, was set up to explore exactly how this should be done. But talks broke down this week – just weeks before a proposal was set to be presented.

Instead of a comprehensive proposal for an overall new migration policy, the committee will now instead put forward separate proposals for new laws in the area of migration, wherever there is a parliamentary majority.

The proposals may include temporary residence permits, protection on humanitarian grounds, rules for bringing a partner to Sweden and requirements around income levels and household size – important legislation that will affect people who want or need to move to Sweden, as well as many current residents.

Gathering enough votes may take different forms depending on the exact proposal. The Social Democrats and Green Party, as well as the Centre Party, Liberals and Left Party for example support a new rule for protection on humanitarian grounds in principle, but the conservative Moderates do not.

But temporary residence permits for asylum seekers (rather than permanent) are backed by among others the Social Democrats and the Moderates.

Because the ruling Social Democrats and opposition party the Moderates – the two biggest parties in parliament – failed to agree on a comprehensive plan, it means several of the latter's individual proposals will not be put forward by the committee (the Moderates would in theory still be able to put them to parliament on their own).

Some of the proposals that will not be included therefore include a 'volume target' (a proposed cap on the number of asylum seekers who can enter Sweden each year), a qualification process for certain welfare benefits, and new measures to make people who have received a deportation notice leave the country.

What's going to happen next?

The Migration Committee is set to decide on its final report by July 23rd, and present it to the government by August 15th. The next likely step is that the government sends the proposals out for a consultation round, after which it may decide to put them to parliament for a vote. Only after that would there be a law change.

The idea is that the proposals put forward by the committee should in theory have as much support in parliament as possible, but tough negotiations are still expected before the government takes the proposals to parliament for a final vote. The Social Democrat-Green coalition would first have to agree on the details, but the minority government would also have to secure enough support for a majority vote in parliament.

The current temporary law, which was introduced back in 2016 after Sweden received record numbers of migrants, refugees and asylum seekers during the crisis of the autumn before, is set to run out next summer. The goal is to replace it with a permanent policy – which may look similar or different – before it expires.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORK PERMITS

How long do high-skilled foreigners have to wait for a Swedish work permit?

Three months after the Swedish Migration Agency rolled out a new system for work permits, is the agency meeting its 30-day target for highly qualified professionals?

How long do high-skilled foreigners have to wait for a Swedish work permit?

More than 7,750 work permit applications have been submitted to Sweden’s Migration Agency since a new system designed to speed up waiting times for skilled workers was implemented.

The new system, rolled out on January 29th, divides workers into four different categories depending on their profession. It was introduced after complaints about long waits for both first-time and renewed work permits and promised to process the top category, “A”, within 30 days.

Category A applications are those already classified as “highly qualified” under the Standard for Swedish Classification of Occupations (SSYK), and include leadership roles, roles requiring higher university education, and roles requiring university education or equivalent.

A Migration Agency spokesperson told The Local that a total of 95 percent of complete work permit applications sent in by highly qualified workers since January 29th were processed within 30 days, with a median handling time of 14 days, according to figures from April 15th.

“Our ambition is to decide cases for highly qualified labour within 30 days – sometimes it happens that the application isn’t complete and that can make the processing time longer,” the spokesperson said.

By mid-April, the Migration Agency had processed 4,461 complete applications, 550 incomplete applications and 423 applications for permanent residency which were complete but had to wait for a decision because the applicant’s previous permit hadn’t yet expired.

Around 77 percent of incomplete applications were processed within 30 days.

A Migration Agency spokesperson told The Local that there may be various reasons why an application is incomplete, but “common mistakes” include passports lacking a signature, incorrect information about accommodation when needed, no or not enough information about the applicant’s insurances, or no statement from the trade union about working conditions.

The spokesperson also said that the four percent of complete applications that didn’t get processed within a month were delayed because of, for example, the applicant failing to visit an embassy to show their passport before the deadline, having a criminal record in Sweden that required further investigation of their application, or the security police blocking their application.

SHOW COMMENTS