SHARE
COPY LINK

BREXIT

OPINION: Coronavirus has made Brexit negotiations impossible so isn’t it time to delay?

Sue Wilson of Bremain in Spain calls for the UK to extend the Brexit transition period so it can focus resources on beating the coronavirus.

OPINION: Coronavirus has made Brexit negotiations impossible so isn't it time to delay?
A flag flies in a garden in Bodium, southern England. Photo: AFP

Brexit has, quite rightly, not topped anyone’s priority list recently, either in the UK or EU. Most resources are being directed at fighting the coronavirus outbreak, leaving little room for progressing the Brexit trade negotiations.

The British government has redirected resources, including 25,000 civil service staff who were exclusively working on Brexit before the virus outbreak. Seemingly, only the UK negotiating team, led by David Frost, has kept its eye firmly on the Brexit ball.

An extension to the transition period was always preferred by those people (mostly Remainers) who were worried about the lack of time for negotiations – especially as international trade deals generally take years to complete, even in normal circumstances. The present circumstances are far from normal.

With the trade talks delayed, and the tight time frame shortened further, even Brexiteers are calling for a delay.

Furthermore, businesses are now begging for a delay, and much of the British public – including 36 percentage of leave voters – is also in favour. An extension to the transition period is now seemingly the “will of the people”.


Health workers acknowledge applause outside the Hospital de Barcelona. Photo: AFP

The argument for delay gained further weight when, on Thursday April 16th, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) added its call for reason. Aiming to avoid uncertainty during a global economic downturn, the IMF’s head, Kristalina Georgieva said: “It is tough as it is. Let's not make it any tougher”. 

When asked specifically about an extension, she said: “My advice would be to seek ways in which this element of uncertainty is reduced in the interests of everybody, of the UK, of the EU, the whole world.”

Practical issues exist, such as the need – according to Michael Gove – for businesses to hire around 50,000 additional staff to handle extra customs paperwork. However, there are far bigger moral and economic issues at hand.

How can the government justify spending valuable resources on Brexit, when it should give the coronavirus crisis 100 percent attention? And how can any government justify putting the people, economy and country through a second serious – and damaging – crisis when it hasn’t recovered from the first?

The damage the virus will inflict on the UK, and other countries, can only be guessed at, but it’s going to be huge. It will take a long time to recover, even without Brexit looming. Neither business nor government can possibly be prepared, especially for the most damaging hard Brexit.

Despite government ministers continuing to insist that, with or without a deal, they’re sticking to the December 31st deadline, it cannot be allowed to happen. With parliament back to work soon, the government might be increasingly pressurised to see sense. There are only two months remaining in which to apply for an extension – a delay that the EU would welcome.

On Wednesday April 16th, Michel Barnier and David Frost – the EU and UK negotiators – met to discuss progressing the trade negotiations. Communications had been stalled during the coronavirus crisis and because both men were recovering from Covid. The purpose of the ‘virtual’ meeting was to schedule ongoing monthly talks, to start week commencing April 20th.

The UK government and negotiators still insist they won’t request an extension. An EU official claimed that the block is baffled by the UK’s position, and that the EU’s political leaders remained “focused on something else now”. He added: “If your house is on fire, that’s your first and sole priority.”

Rumours were circulating in the media that the UK government would request a month-by-month rolling extension. It seems highly unlikely that the EU would agree to that, as it would only increase the uncertainty. However, this would suggest, if true, that the government is at least considering all options.

Perhaps in response to these rumours, on Thursday April 17th, David Frost firmly reiterated the government’s position. He stated: “Transition ends on December 31st this year. We will not ask to extend it. If the EU asks, we will say no. Extending would simply prolong negotiations, create even more uncertainty, leave us liable to pay more to the EU in future, and keep us bound by evolving EU laws at a time when we need to control our own affairs. In short, it is not in the UK's interest to extend.”

Frost’s supposed justification was widely-criticised as counter-intuitive. Rather than create further uncertainty, an extension would remove it and provide much-needed breathing space. Frost’s suggestion that extending would prolong the negotiations suggested he had missed the point – that’s exactly what is being demanded. Even the government-supporting ‘Telegraph’ favoured an extension, calling it “an insurance policy at a time of extreme risk”.

The EU could, of course, still request an extension. Such an action could put the UK government in a difficult position. With business, IMF, British public and opposition parties in favour of a delay, it would be difficult to justify plan A under present circumstances.

The odds of negotiating any deal by the end of 2020 were always short. The coronavirus crisis has made it impossible. Even if the government can live with, or is actively seeking a WTO Brexit, the UK cannot cope with the impact of back-to-back, economically and socially damaging crises.

For four years, I’ve fought against the UK leaving the EU. First, I fought against any kind of Brexit, then against the most damaging of hard Brexits.

While the prevention of a hard Brexit is still my goal, this isn’t about frustrating Brexit. It is about dedicating every penny, minute and ounce of effort to saving the country from a deadlier crisis.

The families of thousands of people who have already made the ultimate sacrifice deserve nothing less.

By Sue Wilson – Chair of Bremain in Spain

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TRAVEL NEWS

EES: Could the launch of Europe’s new border system be delayed again?

After being postponed several times already Europe's new biometric Entry/Exit border system (EES) is set to be rolled out in October, but with fears of lengthy queues, problems with a new app and demands for more time, could it be postponed again?

EES: Could the launch of Europe's new border system be delayed again?

Could the entry into operation of the EU entry/exit system (EES), the new biometric passport checks for non-EU citizens at the Schengen area’s external borders, be delayed yet again?

Originally planned for May 2022, EES has already been postponed many times.

The current launch date, set for October 2024, was chosen to avoid periods of peak traffic and France in particular had requested to avoid it being launched until after the Paris Olympics this summer.

When asked to confirm the October start date this week a spokesperson for the EU’s Commission told The Local that the “roadmap” for the EES IT system foresees it will be ready for Autumn 2024. But the actual start date, in other words, the day when passengers will have to register, would be confirmed nearer the time.

The spokesperson said: “The exact date will be determined by the European Commission and announced on the EES official website well in time for the start of operations.”

READ ALSO: Your key questions answered about Europe’s new EES passport checks

But the reasons are adding up to suggest an October start date is optimistic, perhaps even unlikely.

In the annual report on the ‘State of Schengen’ published last week, the European Commission spelt out that severe challenges remain if member states are to be ready on time.

“In 2023, efforts to ensure the entry into operation of the Entry-Exit System in the autumn of 2024 were accelerated… While important progress has been made across the Schengen area, some Member States are still falling behind, notably regarding the effective equipment of border crossing points. The Commission calls on all Member States to urgently accelerate preparations to ensure the timely implementation of the system…”

A map in the report shows that preparation is still “in progress” in 13 Schengen area countries, including Germany, Norway and Switzerland. “Outstanding issues” still impact Portugal, Malta and Bulgaria.

The state of play for the preparations for EES across EU and Schengen states. Image: European Commission.

There are also reports that EU heavyweight Germany is trying to persuade Brussels to delay.

Matthias Monroy, editor of the German civil rights journal Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP claimed on his website that “the German government is lobbying in Brussels to postpone the date once again, as otherwise the German tests of the EES cannot be completed in full. Other EU countries are also behind schedule, with only eight of them having reported successful integration.”

Even on a French government website it talks of EES being rolled out some time “between the end of 2024 and 2025” rather than stating October 2024.

And according to recent media reports, French airports have been advised to be ready for November 6th, rather than October. 

READ ALSO: EES and Etias – what are the big upcoming travel changes in Europe?

A planned EU app, believed to be essential to the smooth operation of EES because it would allow non-EU visitors to register in advance of travel will not be ready, Gwendoline Cazenave, Managing Director of Eurostar International, the company operating train services via the Channel Tunnel, has told the BBC. The EU however insists the app does not need to be up and running before EES is introduced.

In the UK, which will be heavily impacted by EES due to the fact it is no longer in the EU and so British travellers are no longer EU citizens, the House of Commons European scrutiny committee is conducting an inquiry on the potential disruption the introduction of the EES will cause at the border.

Several respondents have recently raised the alarm about the possible delays the system could cause, especially at the UK-France border, which is used by millions of passengers each year who head to France and other countries across Europe.

Ashford Borough Council in Kent has warned of the possibility of more than 14 hours queues to reach the Port of Dover, which has already been struggling increased checked after Brexit.

The BBC reported that back in March, a P&O Ferries director said the IT system should be delayed again.

Airlines have also complained about the fact pre-travel EES requirements would make last minute bookings impossible.

The Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, has simply said more time is needed.

In other words, it would be little surprise if the roll out was delayed again beyond October 2024.

But the Commission spokesperson told The Local that “the timeline for the entry into operation of the EES took into account all the necessary activities to be performed by all relevant stakeholders to ensure a timely entry into operation. 

“The Commission is working very closely with eu-Lisa [the EU agency in charge of the IT system], the Member States and carriers to ensure that everything is ready for the timely and successful launch of the Entry Exit System.

“The roadmap for the delivery of the new IT architecture foresees that the Entry/Exit system will be ready to enter into operation in Autumn 2024.”

New digital border

The EES is a digital system to register travellers from non-EU countries when they cross a border in or out of the Schengen area, the travel-free area. It will be deployed in 29 countries across Europe including 25 EU states plus Norway, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Ireland and Cyprus are the only EU members who won’t apply the EES system.

It doesn’t apply to non-EU nationals who are legally resident in an EU/Schengen area country or those with dual nationality of an EU /Schengen county. The system was designed to increase security and to ensure that non-EU nationals visiting the Schengen area short-term do not stay more than 90 days in any 180-day period.

Instead of having the passport stamped, travellers will have to scan it at self-service kiosks before crossing the border. However, fingerprints and a photo will have to be registered in front of a guard at the first crossing and there are huge concerns the extra time needed could generate long queues in the UK, where there are juxtaposed border checks with the EU.

Preparations are ongoing throughout Europe and some countries have made good progress.

In France, Getlink, the operator of the Channel Tunnel, has recently reported that new EES infrastructure is finished at its French terminal of Coquelles, which will allow travellers to register their biometric data while travelling.

Eurostar is also installing 49 kiosks in stations for the registration of passengers. But the Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, said more time is needed.

Exempted

Meanwhile, the Polish government has urged UK citizens who are beneficiaries of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement to get a residence permit “in the context of EES/ETIAS”, even though there was not such an obligation to stay legally in Poland post-Brexit.

“Having such a document is beneficial as it will exempt from future Entry/Exit System (EES) registration when crossing external borders and from the need to obtain an ETIAS travel permit in relation to short-term travel to EU/Schengen countries,” the government page says.

This article as published in collaboration with Europe Street news.

SHOW COMMENTS