SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Swiss eggs declared fipronil-free

No trace of the insecticide fipronil has been found in Swiss eggs, according to the Swiss government, which carried out an analysis of domestic eggs in the wake of the scare that has swept through Europe.

Swiss eggs declared fipronil-free
Photo: John Thys/AFP
In a statement, the Swiss food safety office (BLV) said it had tested eggs from producers across the country and found no trace of the banned insecticide. 
 
“Swiss eggs can therefore be eaten without fear,” it said.
 
At the beginning of this month millions of eggs and egg-based products were removed from supermarket shelves across Europe – including Switzerland – after some egg imports from the Netherlands were found to be contaminated with fipronil. 
 
Fipronil is commonly used in veterinary products to get rid of fleas, lice and ticks. But it is banned from being used to treat animals destined for human consumption, such as chickens, because when eaten in large quantities it can harm people's kidneys, liver and thyroid glands.
 
Earlier this month some poultry farms were shut down in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and France after authorities confirmed that the insecticide had been used there illegally. 
 
The European Commission said some 15 countries as well as Switzerland and Hong Kong had received fipronil-contaminated eggs as imports. 
 
The quantities of fipronil found in the imported eggs are not enough to pose a threat to human health, said the BLV, adding that all contaminated eggs had nevertheless now been withdrawn from sale. 
 
Regarding domestic eggs, the BLV said there was nothing to indicate that the company suspected of supplying the insecticide to Dutch poultry farms had done the same to Swiss farms. 

HEALTH INSURANCE

Could glasses and contact lenses soon be covered by Swiss health insurance?

The Swiss health system is ranked among the best in the world, but some essentials, like glasses, aren't automatically covered by health insurance. That could soon change, however

Could glasses and contact lenses soon be covered by Swiss health insurance?

Green Party Federal Councillor Katharina Prelicz-Huber revealed in an interview with newspaper 20 Minuten this week that the Federal Parliament had tabled a motion to include prescription glasses and contact lenses in Switzerland’s mandatory health insurance scheme. 

Prelicz-Huber stated: “The purpose of compulsory health insurance is to provide the services you need to get or stay healthy,”

The motion forms part of the legislation that will be voted on during the 2024 summer session of the Federal Council. 

Proposed changes 

According to Switzerland’s peak optician body, 4 in 5 Swiss wear glasses or contact lenses at some point. 

It’s no surprise that statistics repository, Statista, projects the Swiss eyewear industry to be worth €1.37 billion by 2028. 

Currently, glasses and contact lenses are covered for up to 180 francs for children until age eighteen, if they are proscribed by a doctor.

Adults can also claim money back for glasses and contact lenses – however, they must be suffering from one of a short list of specific conditions such as keratoconus – where the cornea is distorted – or severe myopia, otherwise known as near-sightedness.

They must also have been specifically prescribed them by a doctor or optometrist. 

Otherwise, supplemental optical insurance must be purchased in Switzerland to ensure you can recoup the cost. 

Under the Green Party proposal, glasses, contact lenses, and other visual aids would be covered, regardless of age. 

Rising premiums prompt opposition 

Not everybody agrees with the proposal. 

The right-wing SVP has already spoken out against it, with Federal Councillor Diana Gutjahr arguing: “If we seriously want to slow down the burdensome and constantly rising health costs for the benefit of the population, we [must] show the political will not to constantly expand the benefits of compulsory health insurance.”

A spokesman for the the health insurance advocacy group Santesuisse, Matthias Müller, echoed Gutjahr, claiming that insurance constitutes “financing for extraordinary events such as illness.”

“If almost everyone benefits from a certain service, it is no longer an insurance benefit.”

A date for the vote has yet to be announced. 

SHOW COMMENTS