SHARE
COPY LINK
EU ELECTIONS

POLITICS

Europe’s far right expect election gains

Europe's far right is looking to overcome deep divisions and establish itself as a major player in Brussels after EU elections this week where it is expected to make significant gains.

Europe's far right expect election gains
FPÖ election poster featuring Harald Vilimsky and Heinz-Christian Strache. Photo: FPÖ

With voters tired of a European Union handing down decisions from on high, parties like France's National Front (FN), Britain's UKIP and Austria's Freedom Party (FPÖ) are going strong in the polls ahead of the May 22nd-25th ballot.

But it might not be all plain sailing in the months to come.

Hoping to capitalize on recent support, the FPÖ – formerly led by Joerg Haider who had praised some of Hitler's policies – proudly announced in November that six European far-right parties would join forces to put Europe "back on the right track."

"The agreement is well on its way," leading FPÖ candidate Harald Vilimsky said last week.

Matteo Salvini, head of Italy's Northern League, also spoke of "advanced" talks recently to set up a far-right group, adding it would be "as big as possible" with like-minded parties from Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands and France.

Nationalist parties have regularly talked of setting up an alliance, united by their opposition to the euro and to the EU "monster", which they see as anti-democratic and encroaching on national sovereignty.

Common grievances against Islam, immigration and ethnic minorities like the Roma have also made parties like the FPÖ, FN, Sweden Democrats, Dutch PVV and Belgium's Vlaams Belang natural partners.

In 2007, a short-lived far-right faction – "Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty" – was even formed in the European parliament with FN, FPÖ, Vlaams Belang and Bulgarian Attaka deputies.

But deep divisions remain between the various national parties despite their common "far-right" label, and an alliance will require hard work to stay alive, experts say.

Friends or foes?

The FPÖ and the FN – the latter formerly led by Jean-Marie Le Pen before his daughter Marine took over – are still struggling with lingering accusations of anti-Semitism.

This has turned off potential partners like the Danish People's Party, Finland's far-right Finns or UKIP, whose leader Nigel Farage has rejected any alliance with the National Front.

Islamophobic comments by PVV leader Geert Wilders have meanwhile met with condemnation in France, while Hungary's anti-Semitic Jobbik and the British National Party (BNP) have been kept at arm's length for fear of being too extreme.

"The question is how homogeneous is this faction. Can these parties work together in the long term?" Reinhold Gaertner, a political expert at Innsbruck University, told AFP.

Far-right deputies in the parliament – numbering about 50 in the current 766-seat parliament, according to various analysts – are currently split between different factions or unaligned and isolated.

A far-right group would give them a better status, more funds and greater influence in policy-making, including seats on committees and more speaking time in parliament.

Quarrelling and scandals

Twenty-five deputies from a quarter of the EU's 28 member states are needed to set up a new parliamentary group and observers agree there are enough candidates to make this possible.

FN candidate Aymeric Chauprade has spoken of bringing together a dozen parties and some 50 deputies.

Wilders also said last week he was optimistic that eurosceptic parties including the National Front and Northern League would join forces after the European elections.

"I am very confident, I invested a lot in the last year by travelling all over Europe. We will be able to work together."

But in the long-term, issues over borders and ethnic minorities are bound to create clashes between nationalist parties, as they have in the past, Werner Bauer, a far right expert at the Austrian political institute ÖGPP, told AFP.

He also warned the group will be beset by "constant quarrelling and scandals".

"Many of these movements are centred on leadership figures… and these narcissistic personalities have to first sit down together and come to an agreement."

"I think it will happen, a faction will be set up. But it probably won't exist for very long," Bauer predicted.

In 2007, "Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty" dissolved after just ten months after an Italian-Romanian spat prompted the departure of several Romanian MEPs.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

AUSTRIAN HABITS

What issues do Austrians care about the most?

It is election year, and a new survey reveals which topics Austrians care about the most. Here we tell you what lies closest to their hearts and what does not.

What issues do Austrians care about the most?

On October 23rd, Austria’s will hold its parliamentary elections for the National Council. This election determines the 183 members of the National Council, which is the primary legislative body in the country.

The election to the National Council takes place every five years and it is the country’s most important election. Austrian citizens who are at least 16 years old on election day are entitled to vote.

With the upcoming election in mind, a recent survey conducted by Linz-based Market Institute on behalf of Der Standard, revealed which topics eligible voters in Austria consider the most important, and what actions they are willing to take to see changes taking place.

Better healthcare is top priority

The survey showed that Austrians prioritise improvements in the healthcare system the most. Around 82 percent believe that improving the healthcare system was an important political concern. This belief remains consistent across different age groups and political beliefs. However, the level of interest in healthcare improvements tends to increase with age. 

Concerns surrounding the state of the ountry’s healthcare system have mounted in recent years. Austria is currently dealing with a serious staff shortage in the healthcare sector, meaning fewer available medical staff for patients. Additionally, the system faces new challenges arising from changes in doctors preferences and the limited number of contracts for practices with public healthcare funds. Many doctors prefer to work as private sector doctors, known as “Wahlarzt” in German, rather than having contracts with insurance-funded practices, where the doctors are referred to as “Alle Kassenarzt” in German.

In addition to healthcare, Austrians also prioritise a better education system (78 percent), fighting corruption (76 percent), fighting high prices and inflation (75 percent), maintaining neutrality (72 percent), reducing energy costs (70 percent), and better paid jobs (67 percent). Legalising cannabis ranks lowest in importance among respondents, with only 19 percent in favour.

But even if voters highlighted these issues as important, many revealed. they did not want to get involved politically themselves to make things better. Only about 35 percent of those who want to improve healthcare are ready to join efforts such as demonstrating, collecting signatures, or networking with others to make changes happen.

READ ALSO: EXPLAINED: How the Austrian healthcare system works

Niche topics create more motivation for mobilisation

The survey showed the level of public engagement varied depending on the issue.

From the subjects mentioned above, only two – neutrality and energy costs, have the potential to persuade people to get involved in politics. Since those are niched topics they have potential to garner greater public support and engagement.

David Pfarrhofer, political researcher at Market Institute, suggested that niche topics often mobilise members of the public more than broader issues due to their specific focus and great relevance to smaller groups of people.

Political views influence opinions

Political party connections affect how Austrians view different social issues. While many supporters from different parties agree on protesting against right-wing extremism and supporting rights to free abortion, opinions on other matters such as reducing working hours, improving the military, climate change activism and immigration differ a lot among different political groups.

For example, while half of The Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) and a third of the The Green Party voters (Die Grünen) like the idea of working less, it is not popular among supporters of other parties, especially among those who support the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP).

Another example is that two-thirds of respondents believe that protests against discrimination against women are justified. However, supporters of ÖVP and The Freedom Party (FPÖ) agree less with this statement than the other parties. “This is probably because many of them no longer consider such a disadvantage to exist,” says Pfarrhofer.

When it comes to protests against immigration, 84 percent of FPÖ supporters view protests against immigration as justified, meanwhile 52 percent of The Green Party supporters and 40 percent of SPÖ supporters reject such protests.

READ MORE: Healthcare in Austria: Why are there fewer ‘public’ doctors?

SHOW COMMENTS