SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Lagarde named as first female IMF chief

France's Christine Lagarde was named Tuesday the first-ever female chief of the IMF, faced with an immediate crisis as violent Greek protests rocked the stability of the eurozone.

Lagarde named as first female IMF chief
World Economic Forum/Wikipedia (File)

The French finance minister, respected for her leadership during the financial crises that have shaken Europe over the past three years, was selected by the International Monetary Fund’s executive board to take up the five-year job from July 5.

Her victory came after the BRIC powers — Brazil, Russia, India and China– added their endorsements on top of US and European support, after efforts to construct an emerging economy bloc to challenge Europe’s 65-year lock on the job.

Lagarde replaces fellow countryman Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who resigned abruptly on May 18 after being arrested in New York for an alleged sexual assault.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s office declared the pick a “victory for France,” while British finance minister George Osborne welcomed the “good news for the global economy.”

Lagarde’s choice over Mexican central bank head Agustin Carstens was expected, but not assured until Washington gave her its decisive endorsement and the BRIC countries added theirs.

The 55-year-old lawyer, a divorced mother of two and finance minister since 2007, was chosen by consensus rather than a vote of the 24 IMF executive directors, the board said.

A European has held the position by tacit agreement with Washington since 1946, and Europe’s leaders were determined to have someone already deeply involved in its ongoing crises, especially Greece.

The secretive process, coming after the IMF promised transparency, drew criticism from groups pressing for more openness in the Fund.

“This travesty of an appointment process undermines the credibility of the IMF. Rumors had circulated about some openness, but before the candidates were interviewed, the decision had already been made,” said Luc Lampriere, the director of Oxfam France.

Lagarde had to earn the support of the emerging powers, where worries over eurozone stability were accompanied by concerns that she would be too focused on Europe, and unable to take a neutral stance.

She stressed she would work for the Fund’s entire membership.

“The IMF has served its 187 member countries well during the global economic and financial crisis, transforming itself in many positive ways,” she said in a statement after her nomination.

“I will make it my overriding goal that our institution continues to serve its entire membership with the same focus and the same spirit.”

Carstens, who failed to rally developing economies to mount any real challenge, praised Lagarde as “very capable” but added that he hoped she would strengthen IMF governance “so as to assure its legitimacy, cohesiveness and ultimately, its effectiveness.”

The Fund, which plays a crucial but often controversial role in aiding countries in financial straits, was left reeling after Strauss-Kahn resigned in the middle of tense negotiations over Greece’s massive bailout.

IMF chief since 2007, Strauss-Kahn was arrested in New York on allegations that he sexually assaulted a hotel chambermaid, allegations he denies.

Though not an economist, Lagarde has gained wide respect as France’s point-woman during its leadership of the G20 as well as in European debt talks.

She faces an immediate crisis on the job with Greece, where protesters and police battled in the streets on the eve of an expected parliamentary vote on the IMF-European Union-dictated austerity program to help the country avoid default — but also likely add to the hardship in its ravaged economy.

“If I have a message this evening about Greece, it is a call to the Greek opposition for it to join in national unity with the party which is currently in power,” Lagarde urged in an interview on France’s TF1 television.

Looking ahead, she needs to advance reforms of the global finance system to protect against systemic weaknesses coming from some of the most powerful economies, including Europe and the United States.

She also must deliver on promises of a bigger role in the IMF for the BRICs.

“India looks forward to governance and quota reforms of the Fund to reflect global economic realities,” India’s IMF director, Arvind Virmani, said in a statement endorsing Lagarde.

There were also calls for the IMF to make the process of choosing its managing director more transparent.

“She should waste no time in establishing a legitimate selection process for the next managing director that is truly based on merit,” said Mohamed El-Erian, head of the investment giant Pimco and a one-time candidate to run the Fund.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

JOHN LICHFIELD

OPINION: Macron’s attempts to tame world leaders shows he’s more a thinker than a diplomat

French President Emmanuel Macron's flawed efforts to charm the world's autocratic and populist leaders have previously ended in failure or even humiliation. Taking the Chinese president to the Pyrenees won't change that record, writes John Lichfield.

OPINION: Macron's attempts to tame world leaders shows he's more a thinker than a diplomat

Emmanuel Macron used to fancy himself as a lion-tamer.

There wasn’t a murderous dictator or mendacious populist that the French President would not try to charm: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, Narendra Modi, Recep Tayip Erdogan, Victor Orban.

The results, overall, have been poor. Sometimes Macron has been eaten, diplomatically-speaking. Years of trying to smooth-talk Vladimir Putin – with invitations to Versailles and the presidential retreat at Fort Brégancon and the long-table talks in the Kremlin – ended in disillusion and humiliation.

Macron’s attempts to create a blokeish friendship with Boris Johnson ended in cross-Channel exchanges of insults and accusations. His mission to find a core, reasonable Donald Trump ended in the discovery that there was no reasonable Donald Trump, just a self-obsessed, shallow deal-maker or deal-breaker.

And now President Xi Jinping of China. The two presidents and their wives are on an away-day to the French Pyrenees (Tuesday), visiting a region dear to Macron since his childhood.

The first day of Xi’s French state visit in Paris yesterday seems to have produced very little. The Chinese president promised to send no arms to Russia but that is a long-standing promise that he has, technically-speaking, kept.

Xi is reported to have promised to restrict sales to Moscow of “secondary materials” which can be used to make arms. We will see.

The Chinese leader also agreed to support Macron’s call for an “Olympic truce” in Ukraine and elsewhere for the duration of the Paris games in late July and August. Good luck with that.

On the gathering menace of a trade war between the EU and China, no progress was made. As a minimal concession to his French hosts, Xi promised to drop threatened dumping duties on French Cognac and Armagnac sales to China.

Otherwise, Xi said that he could not see a problem. Cheap Chinese-built electric cars and solar panels and steel are swamping the EU market? All the better for the European fight against inflation and global warming.

READ MORE: How ‘Battery Valley’ is changing northern France

Maybe more will be achieved in shirt-sleeves in the Pyrenees today. The Chinese leadership is said to approve of Macron or at least believe that he is useful to them.

Beijing likes the French President’s arguments, renewed in a speech last month, that the EU should become a “strategic” commercial and military power in its own right and not a “vassal” of the United States. The Chinese leadership evidently has no fear of the EU becoming a rival power. It sees Macron’s ideas for a “Europe puissance” as a useful way of dividing the West and weakening the strength of Washington, the dollar and “western values”.

Macron has sometimes encouraged this way of thinking, perhaps accidentally. After his state visit to China last year, he gave a rambling media interview in which he seemed to say that the EU had no interest in being “followers of the US” or defending Taiwan from Chinese aggression. He had to amend his words later.

That was Macron at his worst, an ad-lib, stand-up diplomat who ignores advice from the professionals in the Quai d’Orsay. I would argue, however, that the wider Macron argument – the EU must become more powerful or die – is the French President at his best.

Few other politicians in the world think ahead so much as Macron does. Democratic politics is mired in short-termism. Only autocrats like Xi or Putin can afford to think in terms of decades or centuries.

Macron likes to look around corners. He is often a better thinker than he is a diplomat or practical, daily politician.

His core argument – made in his Sorbonne speech last month and an interview with The Economist – is that Europe faces an unprecedented triple threat to its values, its security and its future prosperity.  

The rise of intolerant populist-nationalism threatens the values and institutions implanted in Europe after World War Two. The aggression of Russia and the detachment of the US (not just Donald Trump) threatens Europe’s security. The abandonment of global rules on fair trade – by Joe Biden’s US as well as Xi’s China – threatens to destroy European industry and sources of prosperity.

READ MORE: OPINION – Macron must earn the role of ’21st-century Churchill’

Civilisations, like people, are mortal, Macron says. Unless the EU and the wider democratic Europe (yes, you post-Brexit Britain) address these problems there is a danger that European civilisation (not just the EU experiment) could die.

Exaggerated? Maybe. But the problems are all real. Macron’s solutions are a powerful European defence alliance within Nato and targeted European protectionism and investment for the industries of the future.

The chances of those things being agreed by in time to make a difference are non-existent to small. In France, as elsewhere, these big “strategic” questions scarcely figure in popular concerns in the European election campaign.

Emmanuel Macron has now been president for seven years. His remaining three years in office will be something between disjointed and paralysed.

It is too early to write his political obituary but the Xi visit and the Sorbonne speech offer the likely main components. Macron will, I fear, be remembered as a visionary thinker and flawed diplomat/politician.

SHOW COMMENTS