SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

WORK PERMITS

‘We don’t have the skills in Sweden, so we need to recruit from abroad’

Sven-Olof Daunfeldt, the chief economist of the Confederation of Swedish Industry, tells The Local why labour migration is essential and why raising the work permit salary threshold is a "crazy" policy.

'We don't have the skills in Sweden, so we need to recruit from abroad'
Sven-Olof Daunfeldt, chief economist at the Confederation of Swedish Industry. Photo: Ari Luostarinen/SvD/TT

For the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise’s chief economist, Sven-Olof Daunfeldt, labour migration is essential if Sweden is to meet the challenges of the next decade, particularly big investments in infrastructure and electricity systems, and the greening of industry in northern Sweden.  

READ ALSO: Northvolt warns work permit salary threshold could jeopardise Sweden’s green transition

“We need to recruit talent to Sweden, and experts, because we were going to need to make big investments in Sweden during the coming years, and this means that we also need a lot of competence,”  Daunfeldt told The Local’s Sweden in Focus podcast. “And we don’t have that in Sweden: we need to recruit from abroad, and the problem in Sweden right now is that we don’t have a national strategy for attracting talent to Sweden from abroad.” 

When Daunfeldt speaks with the innovative companes that are crucial to Sweden’s future growth, he says they complain of three main obstacles to international recruitment: high income tax, housing shortages, and trouble getting work permits. 

“Taxes on high incomes are very, very high in Sweden,” he said. “This means that a lot of people choose to to go to some other country to work because they get more, they get a higher salary after tax, which is the thing that is important.” 

READ ALSO: Is Sweden losing the European race to attract highly skilled foreigners?

When this was combined with the high cost of housing, many potential recruits felt that they would be worse-off in Sweden, he said. 

“The third issue is that the Migration Agency is taking too long to handle work permits: That’s actually been getting better now, but it has been a huge problem.”

SEE MORE: Sweden’s Migration Agency celebrates cutting waiting times for work permits

What Daunfeldt has found frustrating is that rather than make international recruitment easier the government has been raising the barriers. 

Sweden on November 1st brought in a new work permit salary threshold set at 80 percent of the median salary, or 28,480 kronor a month, leading to a 2,000 percent increase in the number of work permit applications rejected because the salary was too low. In June next year, the govenment plans to raise the threshold to the full median salary of 35,600 kronor.

  • Don’t miss any Swedish work permit news from The Local by downloading our app (available on Apple and Android) and then selecting Work Permits in your Notification options via the User button

Daunfeldt rejected the argument of the Swedish government that the salary thresholds would only impact low-skilled labour and said it was wrong anyway to assume that low-skilled labour was not needed in Sweden.  

“We also need people with more low-skilled labor, and we have a huge problem with the new wage floor,” he said. “I think 50 percent of those that have a salary under that wage level are actually graduates, so highly qualified people are actually earning less than the 35,000 kronor that the government is talking about.”

INTERVIEW: Half of those blocked by Sweden’s work permit salary threshold will be graduates

The system of exemptions proposed earlier this year in the conclusions of a government enquiry, would “definitely” not solve this problem, he said. 

“We have tried this before, and it doesn’t work, because you can’t have the government or some bureaucrat choosing which which jobs are suitable for people from abroad and which are not. It is businesses that need to select the people that they want – the government cannot do it.” 

What makes these proposals even worse, he complained, was that they risked undermining the Swedish model, which is based around wages being set in collective bargaining between his organisation and the Swedish Trade Union Confederation. 

“This means that, actually, the Swedish government will introduce a minimum wage for certain types of workers that is kind of legislated — which is totally against the Swedish model. Previously they were very much against legislating for a minimum wage from the European Union, but now they have themselves legislated for a minimum wage. So it’s kind of absurd, the whole situation.”

READ MORE: Why Sweden doesn’t have a minimum wage and how to ensure you’re fairly paid

He also rejected the government’s argument that raising the salary threshold would force companies to hire more of those who are already in Sweden but unemployed. 

“If that had been the case, they would already have had this these jobs. [Companies] would hire [unemployed people in Sweden] if they thought that they were available for those positions. But the problem is that many of those that are long-term unemployed in Sweden are low-skilled, they are low-educated, and and they have a huge problem coming into the Swedish market.”

As well as harming businesses and growth, he said it was “very disturbing” that the hike in the minimum salary threshold would force many former refugees to return to the country from which they fled just as they were starting to get established in Sweden. 

“People that are here that are on the minimum salary, they are the ones who should be worried,” he said. “You have a lot of refugees that have not got refugee status and have had a temporary work permit to be a labour migrant instead. And they are now facing the possibility to have to go home to the country from which they’ve fled.” 

Despite all these arguments, Daunfeldt said he did not expect the government to drop plans for the median salary threshold. 

READ ALSO: Swedish migration minister defends raising work permit salary threshold

“I’m quite skeptical. I very pessimistic at the moment. It seems that they have decided already on this crazy policy. So unfortunately, I think they want to have this new wage floor.” 

The salary threshold also, he warned, risked harming the very people it was intended to protect: workers already in Sweden.

“One of the big investigations we have done at the Confederation of Swedish Industry is this paper where we look at the productivity in firms, when they actually hire experts from abroad on a high salary. And what we can see is that this increases the productivity within the firm from 6 percent to 11 percent.”

“What is also interesting is that for up to five years after you hire this expert from abroad, you can actually see that the salary for the other workers in the firms increases from between 1 percent to 2 percent.” 

Despite these problems, however, Daunfeldt said that there was some progress being made on attracting competence to Sweden. 

“On the whole, Sweden is a fantastic country and we need so many workers. I think it will be easier for those that are more high-skilled to come into the Swedish labour market, because there we can see that the government is actually listening. And I think they will try to do certain things to attract more high talent people to Sweden, and I can see that they’re listening to that.”

This was a relief, he said, as a majority of companies in Sweden say recruiting the right competence is their biggest barrier to growth. 

“We have had an investigation at the Confederation of Swedish Industry where we have asked our companies about the growth barriers [they face], and actually 56 percent of the firms said that being able to hire personnel with the right competence was a growth problem for them today. That’s very disturbing, especially now, when we also have high unemployment and a lot of people that are not in the labour force.” 

Daunfeldt said that the government’s plans to decrease the threshold for highly skilled foreigners to take advantage of the lower “expert tax” regime would certainly make Sweden more attractive to the more highly paid foreign experts.

But he said that a better solution would be to simply reduce the top rate of marginal tax for all workers in Sweden. 

“This will also bring huge benefits to Swedes because they will work more and they will get educated,” he said. “The premium to go into higher education in Sweden is very low at the moment, so I think that the best solution will be just to decrease marginal taxes for everybody who is working in Sweden.” 

Sven-Olov Daunfeldt was interviewed by The Local’s publisher James Savage for the Sweden in Focus podcast. 

Member comments

  1. They do have the talent and skills. The issue is more “need to fit the exact box” thinking.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORK PERMITS

EXPLAINED: How a ‘request to conclude’ can speed up Swedish Migration Agency decisions

If you've been waiting six months or more for a ruling from a Swedish agency you can according to law submit a "request to conclude", forcing the agency to take a decision. Is this worth doing in work permit, residency permit and citizenship cases?

EXPLAINED: How a 'request to conclude' can speed up Swedish Migration Agency decisions

What is a ‘request to conclude’? 

According to Sweden’s Administrative Procedure Act, which came into force in 2018, if an application you have made has not been decided “in the first instance” within six months at the latest, you can request in writing that the agency decide the case, using a process called a dröjsmålstalan, or “request for a case to be expedited”. 

The agency then has four weeks to either take a decision or reject the request to conclude in a separate decision. You can then appeal this rejection to the relevant court or administrative authority. 

You can only use the request to conclude mechanism once in each case. 

READ ALSO: Sweden’s government snubs Migration Agency request for six-month rule exemption

How do you apply for a ‘request to conclude’ a Migration Agency case? 

It’s very easy to fill in the form on the Migration Agency website, which only asks you to give your personal details, say whether your case concerns a work permit, residency permit, right of residency case, or ‘other’, and list any other people applying along with you. You then send the application by post to the Migration Agency address on the form. 

Does it work? 

A lot of people do seem to have success using the mechanism. The Migration Agency in section 9.1 of its annual report says that it is forced to to prioritise those who do this trick after a six month wait ahead of those who have spent longer in the queue. This is particularly the case for the ‘easy’ applications. 

More or less everyone, though, has their initial request to conclude refused, seemingly automatically without the request ever being seen by a case officer. 

Most them are then successful when they then appeal this refusal to the Migration court, with the Migration Agency stating on page 91 of its annual report that it lost 96 percent of such cases in 2021, 80 percent of such cases in 2022 and 77 percent of such cases in 2023.

As the Administrative Procedure Act states clearly that a decision should come within six months, the Migration Agency has in most cases a weak legal position.  

Once your request is rejected you only a short time to appeal, so it is important to act quickly, even if the agency fails to inform you that your request has been rejected. It you have heard nothing and the four weeks are up, it’s important to chase your request so you can appeal before the deadline expires. 

Even those who are rejected and don’t appeal sometimes get results, finding they are asked to submit their passport shortly afterwards. 

However, this is not always the case, so it is essential to go ahead with the appeal anyway, even if your passport is requested. 

What do people say? 

The mechanism appears to be particularly popular among British people, with one member of the Brits in Sweden Facebook page saying that “pretty much everyone has used it”, but it is also used by other groups, such as Indians in Sweden. 

One British woman said she had been informed about the rule by her case officer, and, although she was worried it might make a negative decision more likely, is glad she did so. 

“I used it as it was offered and I didn’t want to wait any longer. I thought there was nothing to lose and it didn’t cost anything, only a bit of time!” she said. 

She had her request for decision accepted, with the officer in four weeks getting back to her requesting that she send in two more forms, one documenting her relationship with an EU citizen, and another on her ability to support herself and pay for her accomodation

“It’s a shame they didn’t advertise it more widely and I didn’t hear about it before. as I could have got a decision earlier on my residency application and then could have applied for permanent residency much sooner,” she said. 

Another British woman said that she had decided to send in a request for a decision after she had been waiting for seven months for a decision on citizenship and her case officer told her to expect to wait as long as 36 months, despite being a simple case given that she had lived in Sweden lawfuly for five years, working throughout. 

“I knew of the request to conclude option and used it. They waited the full month before responding and rejecting it, as was expected. But the next day also assigned me a case officer and asked for my passport,” she remembers. “I believe they did this so I wouldn’t appeal their rejection and get the courts support for them to hurry up and process it.” 

Two months later, her citizenship was approved. 

An Indian man said he had used the mechanism no fewer than three times, firstly when extending a work permit, then when applying for permanent residency for a dependent, and thirdly, when applying for citizenship.

In the first case, he said, the request had been accepted on a first attempt and his work permit extension — for which he had been waiting for more than a year — was granted 28 days later.

The second request, which he made after discovering his dependent had no case officer after seven months, was rejected. They appealed, the court ruled in their favour and their case officer gave a positive decision a month later. 

Finally, in the citizenship case, the court ruled in his favour after the request was rejected, but 40 days later he is still waiting for a decision on the initial application.

Does sending in a request increase your chance of having an application rejected? 

Anecdotally, it doesn’t appear to. 

“It was a concern, yes,” the first British woman said, saying she had been told that sending in the form was “no reason to reject my application.” 

“But this is Sweden and in my opinion, even simple or clear-cut things can be a gamble,” she added. 

How does the mechanism affect handling times overall? 

While the request-to-conclude mechanism might help applicants in individual cases, the Migration Agency complains that it has been making the problem of long processing times worse by creating an addition set of processes case officers need to handle, and also by affecting the agency’s ability to prioritise. 

“The fact that many individuals request that their cases be decided is taking up a lot of resources and leading to processing times generally becoming longer, not least as many delay cases are appealed to the court,” Mikael Ribbenvik, the Migration Agency’s former Director General said when asking for the agency to be exempted from the system in April 2023. 

SHOW COMMENTS