SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

SPANISH HISTORY

‘La leyenda blanca’: How Spain responded to the black legend hoax

You've probably heard of 'la leyenda negra' (the black legend) used by the English and other nationalities to demonise the Spanish empire, but few people know that Spain responded with its own subtle propaganda machine against its enemies.

'La leyenda blanca': How Spain responded to the black legend hoax
Mural by Mexican artist Alberto Rivera (husband of Frida Kahlo) depicting Spanish conquistadores enslaving native people, which historians consider an example of Spain's black legend in Latin America in the 20th century.

Hispanophiles and history buffs among our readership have likely heard of la leyenda negra – the so-called ‘black legend’ used to undermine the Spanish empire and demonise Spain, Catholicism and Spaniards more generally.

This was essentially an early form of fake news or propaganda (some historians call it a ‘hoax’) pushed by Spain’s imperial rivals in order to downplay its achievements and damage its reputation abroad.

But what you might not have known is that Spain had its own propaganda tool in response – la leyenda blanca (the white legend).

READ ALSO: The forgotten country that existed between Spain and Portugal

La leyenda negra

Firstly, a bit about the black legend. Most historians believe La leyenda negra dates back to the 16th century and is rooted in imperial rivalry, although some history books suggest animosity against Iberian people began even earlier, with different versions of the black legend conjured up by Italians, Germans and Jews (the latter having been kicked out by the Catholic Kings in 1492). 

During the 1500s, it was mostly pushed by the English (as well as Spain’s other European rivals such as Holland) and it was designed to portray the Spanish as particularly evil or dangerous, downplay its culture, civilisation, and imperial discoveries, and generally to try and undermine Spain’s power and reputation abroad.

Of course, this was mainly done due to competition, but it also speaks to the fierce anti-Catholicism in parts of northern Europe in the early-modern period.

Using disinformation to demonise or discredit your political opponents is nothing new, of course. Nor is manipulating public opinion. But whereas today ‘fake news’ is done through algorithms and artificial intelligence, back then it was done with the technology of the day – namely the printing press and pamphlets.

An 18th century artwork by Bernard Picart depicting the Spanish Inquisition carrying out tortures.

According to an article by the University of Valladolid: “Exaggerating the facts, if not inventing them, was one of the tactics used by the English to spread the ‘black legend’ of Spain, with which they were at war (1585-1604), and with which they were competing in the American expansionist race.

“To this end, they had the support of English pamphleteers who waged a war of propaganda, anti-Spanish and anti-Catholic, to manipulate English public opinion.”

Historians usually note that the black legend was based on Spanish atrocities in Latin America (of which there were certainly many) but exaggerated by the English in order to stir up anti-Catholicism and portray the Spanish as a bloodthirsty people.

Another example is the Spanish Inquisition. They’re immediately associated with religious lunacy and carrying out torturous atrocities over the slightest hint of heresy and blasphemy, an image which has since been largely debunked (they were no angels, but they didn’t kill as many people in Spain and America as has been claimed).

La leyenda negra is well established in historiography. What’s less known is Spain’s response – la leyenda blanca (the white legend).

La leyenda blanca

Research from Berta Cano Echevarría, Professor of English Philology at the University of Valladolid, suggests that rather than creating a retaliatory black legend, the Spanish instead built a ‘white legend’ around the English, a type of propaganda that was more subtle but effective.

The thing that allowed the Spanish to do this, Echevarría says, was the lack of knowledge about the English in Spain at the time.

“If we search the literary works for the image of the English at the time, we find a frustrating gap. There are very few characters of this nationality in fiction, and those that do appear have no distinctive features of national character, especially in comparison with the French, Portuguese and Moors, who were portrayed according to stereotypes of the time,” she says.

England was considered remote and largely irrelevant by Spaniards until the Spanish-English War (1585–1604) began.

READ ALSO: Did Spain really not have any colonies?

Interestingly, in what goes against the cultural stereotypes of the 21st century, in the 16th century it was the English who made an effort to learn Spanish and to translate the works of Spanish writers, whereas in Spain, Echevarría says, “there are hardly any translations from English and no one was interested in learning the enemy’s language.”

As such, the main source of information about England were exiled English Catholics themselves, many of whom were refugees in Spain due to religious persecution. They were also the authors of the very few translations from English into Spanish that existed at the time.

Why is that important? Well, Echevarría says, “the English colleges in Spain became not only centres of education but also important transmitters and conveyors of secret information between the two countries”.

Joseph Creswell, a Jesuit in charge of the Valladolid college, was widely respected as a man with intimate knowledge of the inner-workings of the English court, and he was kept up to date by the endless letters he received daily from England.

Some of these letters were translated (exaggerated and manipulated) and then published in Spanish. Many had descriptions of persecuted Catholics in England.

Echevarría gives the examples of “nuns persecuted and dispossessed of their property, families separated and forced to flee to France and, above all, priests captured, tortured and cruelly executed.”

Interestingly, these sorts of letters and pamphlets were designed not to suggest that the English were an evil Protestant people, but rather the opposite: to give the impression that the English were a Catholic people suffering the tyranny of Protestant rulers.

READ ALSO: The one thing to know about each of Spain’s ‘crazy’ kings and queens

As such, portraying England as a Catholic country victimised by Protestant politicians was designed to win popular support for then King Felipe II’s supposed plan to invade and ‘return’ it to Catholicism. According to the propaganda, Spain would have, in this case, been a liberating force.

But it never came to fruition. The black and white legends, and propaganda wars more broadly, died off when Spain and England signed for peace in 1604-1605.

Bizarrely, Echevarría notes, the Spaniards then started pumping out pro-English propaganda: “In order to convince people that the peace was beneficial, a curious pro-English propaganda campaign was promoted in which even Miguel de Cervantes took part.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Spanish government begins proceedings to outlaw Franco Foundation

Spain's Ministry of Culture has opened legal proceedings to shut down the 'Fundación Francisco Franco', a group dedicated to the dictator who ruled Spain for almost forty years.

Spanish government begins proceedings to outlaw Franco Foundation

Spain’s Ministry of Culture has begun the process of outlawing the Fundación Francisco Franco because it fails to comply with the Democratic Memory Law, controversial legislation passed two years ago by the ruling Socialists (PSOE) to try and help Spain come to terms with its dictatorial past.

The foundation, which essentially promotes the legacy of former dictator General Francisco Franco, who ruled Spain from 1939 to 1975, was founded in 1976 and presents itself as a “cultural institution without political affiliation”. It also sells nationalist memorabilia and books.

Among many admiring articles on its website, the foundation claims that Franco helped lay “the foundations on which it was possible for the democracy we enjoy to be built” and that “his successes are considerably greater than his mistakes.”

READ ALSO: 13 changes you may have missed about Spain’s new ‘Civil War’ law

The Ministry explained that it started legal proceedings to shut down the foundation “because it is considered contrary to the general interest to defend Francoism”. The move, which will likely prove controversial in Spain, has been justified by the government because it “complies with the provisions of the Democratic Memory Law.”

The legal justification is an article of the law that outlaws any group “that glorifies the coup d’état and the dictatorship or extols its leaders, with contempt and humiliation of the dignity of the victims of the coup d’état, the war or Francoism, or direct or indirect incitement to hatred or violence against them because of their status as such.”

The Democratic Memory Law, sometimes also referred to as the Historical Memory Law, was passed in October 2022 and is a wide-ranging piece of legislation that aims to settle Spanish democracy’s debt to the past and deal with the complicated legacies of its Civil War and the Franco dictatorship.

READ ALSO: Spain to relocate remains of Franco’s fascist allies to more low-key grave

The Spanish right has long been opposed to any kind of historical memory legislation, claiming that it digs up old rivalries and causes political tension. Spain’s centre-right party, the Partido Popular, pledged at the time to overturn the law if it entered government.

Among many other measures, the law made the search and excavation of mass graves the responsibility of the government, started DNA banks to identify victims, and annulled Franco-era convictions.

Culture Minister Ernest Urtasun stated in the Spanish press that the decision will ultimately be made by the courts. “Basically what we are doing is starting the implementation of the Democratic Memory Law,” he said.

The Franco Foundation said in a press statement that “we find it incomprehensible” that the law is being “directed exclusively against the Francisco Franco National Foundation.”

The process is expected to be lengthy and could involve several levels of the Spanish judiciary. The Franco Foundation may appeal any decision.

Democratic memory legislation is one of a series of steps by the PSOE government to make amends with the past, including exhuming Franco’s body and moving his body to a private family grave in 2019.

The Franco dictatorship is in living memory for many Spaniards and still an emotive issue. Critics argue historical memory legislation digs up historical divisions, and several right-wing run regions of Spain have attempted to repeal the Democratic Memory Law, including Valencia, the Balearic Islands, and Castilla y León.

READ ALSO: IN PICTURES: Franco exhumed, transported by helicopter, and reburied as Spain takes ‘step towards reconciliation’

SHOW COMMENTS