SHARE
COPY LINK

SHOPPING

French parliament votes to slow down fast fashion

France's parliament on Thursday backed a string of measures making low-cost fast fashion, especially from Chinese mass producers, less attractive to buyers.

French parliament votes to slow down fast fashion
Clothes are displayed on hangers at a Chinese fashion brand Shein pop-up store in Paris on May 4, 2023. (Photo by Christophe ARCHAMBAULT / AFP)

The vote makes France the first country in the world “legislating to limit the excesses of ultra fast fashion”, said Christophe Bechu, minister for the ecological transition.

The bill targets certain brands and online sites – including Primark, Shein and Temu – that offer low-cost, lower-quality clothing.

The government is proposing a ban on advertising for the cheapest textiles, and an environmental charge slapped on low-cost items.

“When we buy on these sites, we know what we are doing and we contribute to massive pollution of our environment,” centrist Horizons deputy Anne-Cecile Violland told France 2. 

The head of France’s National Clothing Federation, Pierre Talamon, was in support of the proposal. He told Franceinfo that “we must penalise those who market overproduction, which pushes people to buy clothes and wear them seven or eight times before throwing them in the trash.”

“These online companies do not create jobs, they destroy them,” he added.

What is being proposed?

The bill would create an extra charge for fast-fashion brands – this ‘eco-contribution’ would be paid by companies on a sliding scale based on their environmental impact.

By 2030, it could reach up to €10 item sold, or 50 percent of the sale price, depending on the brand.

Violland told AFP that the proceeds from the charge would be used to subsidise producers of sustainable clothes, allowing them to compete more easily.

The bill doesn’t propose any minimum price for consumers, but it’s assumed that costs would be passed on to purchasers, potentially spelling the end of deals like a €3 T-shirt.

The third article of the bill would prohibit advertising for fast-fashion, similar to how France has outlawed the advertising of fossil fuels.

In terms of how this would work in practice, the bill states that guidelines would later be specified by the Conseil d’État, but Violland also referenced potentially adding messages on websites that would make consumers aware of the environmental impact of their purchases, similar to how France’s Evin Law regulates the advertising of alcoholic beverages.

While this measure was approved by French MPs, one conservative lawmaker, Antoine Vermorel-Marques, remarked that “a ban on advertising for textiles, especially fashion, spells the end of fashion”.

So what counts as ‘fast fashion’?

France will focus on waste and environmental impact, applying criteria such as volumes of clothes produced and turnover speed of new collections in determining what constitutes fast fashion, according to the law.

An initiative brought by left-wing and Green party deputies to include minimum penalties for producers breaking the rules as well as import quotas and stricter workplace criteria in the industry into the new law was struck down.

Once the law comes into force — which still requires a vote in the Senate — precise criteria will be published in a decree.

In the draft bill, lawmakers specifically referenced the Chinese ‘ready-to-wear’ company Shein as being at the forefront of ‘fast-fashion’ trends, which has been accused of forced labour and use of dangerous chemicals by rights advocates.

Noting the 7,200 new clothing options a day and 470,000 different products available to customers, French lawmakers wrote that “Shein offers 900 times more products than a traditional French retailer.”

In an interview with Le Figaro, Violland said that the “overproduction of clothing, which arrives from Asia in contravention of all environmental regulations, is dramatic. It is urgent to tackle this problem in a very concrete way.”

Why regulate fast-fashion?

The textile industry is famous for its negative effects on the environment – it is responsible for around 10 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the World Bank Group.

On top of that, the industry uses over one trillion gallons of water for dyeing garments, with one-fifth of water pollution in the world attributable to textile dyes and treatments.

According to the Guardian, “only 12 percent of material used for clothing is recycled,” with at least 92 million tonnes of textile waste created annually.

In their initial summary of the bill, French lawmakers wrote that “trend in the clothing sector towards ephemeral fashion, combining increased volumes with a low-price policy, is influencing consumer buying habits by creating buying impulses and a constant need for renewal, which has environmental, social and economic consequences.”

This echoes the results of a 2022 French study, which found that over half of consumers throw away their clothes because they are just ‘bored of them'”.

What else is France doing to combat textile waste?

As part of France’s 2020 anti-waste law, the country banned companies from destroying unsold or returned clothing. The law also prohibited destroying other items that could instead be recycled, including electronics. 

Additionally, in November, the French government launched a scheme meant to encourage people to have their clothes and shoes repaired rather than throwing them away.

The scheme is meant to incentivise getting items like clothing and shoes repaired, with the hopes of cutting down on the 700,000 tonnes of clothes thrown away by French people each year, two-thirds of which ends up in landfill.

A €154 million fund set up by the French government, to cover the period from 2023-2028, will allow customers to see discounts directly on their bills.

READ MORE: How France’s clothes and shoes repair bonus works

In June 2023, the EU passed their ‘Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles‘, with one of the Commission’s 2030 goals being to make “‘fast fashion is out of fashion’ and for consumers to benefit longer from high quality affordable textiles”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

JOHN LICHFIELD

OPINION: Macron’s attempts to tame world leaders shows he’s more a thinker than a diplomat

French President Emmanuel Macron's flawed efforts to charm the world's autocratic and populist leaders have previously ended in failure or even humiliation. Taking the Chinese president to the Pyrenees won't change that record, writes John Lichfield.

OPINION: Macron's attempts to tame world leaders shows he's more a thinker than a diplomat

Emmanuel Macron used to fancy himself as a lion-tamer.

There wasn’t a murderous dictator or mendacious populist that the French President would not try to charm: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, Narendra Modi, Recep Tayip Erdogan, Victor Orban.

The results, overall, have been poor. Sometimes Macron has been eaten, diplomatically-speaking. Years of trying to smooth-talk Vladimir Putin – with invitations to Versailles and the presidential retreat at Fort Brégancon and the long-table talks in the Kremlin – ended in disillusion and humiliation.

Macron’s attempts to create a blokeish friendship with Boris Johnson ended in cross-Channel exchanges of insults and accusations. His mission to find a core, reasonable Donald Trump ended in the discovery that there was no reasonable Donald Trump, just a self-obsessed, shallow deal-maker or deal-breaker.

And now President Xi Jinping of China. The two presidents and their wives are on an away-day to the French Pyrenees (Tuesday), visiting a region dear to Macron since his childhood.

The first day of Xi’s French state visit in Paris yesterday seems to have produced very little. The Chinese president promised to send no arms to Russia but that is a long-standing promise that he has, technically-speaking, kept.

Xi is reported to have promised to restrict sales to Moscow of “secondary materials” which can be used to make arms. We will see.

The Chinese leader also agreed to support Macron’s call for an “Olympic truce” in Ukraine and elsewhere for the duration of the Paris games in late July and August. Good luck with that.

On the gathering menace of a trade war between the EU and China, no progress was made. As a minimal concession to his French hosts, Xi promised to drop threatened dumping duties on French Cognac and Armagnac sales to China.

Otherwise, Xi said that he could not see a problem. Cheap Chinese-built electric cars and solar panels and steel are swamping the EU market? All the better for the European fight against inflation and global warming.

READ MORE: How ‘Battery Valley’ is changing northern France

Maybe more will be achieved in shirt-sleeves in the Pyrenees today. The Chinese leadership is said to approve of Macron or at least believe that he is useful to them.

Beijing likes the French President’s arguments, renewed in a speech last month, that the EU should become a “strategic” commercial and military power in its own right and not a “vassal” of the United States. The Chinese leadership evidently has no fear of the EU becoming a rival power. It sees Macron’s ideas for a “Europe puissance” as a useful way of dividing the West and weakening the strength of Washington, the dollar and “western values”.

Macron has sometimes encouraged this way of thinking, perhaps accidentally. After his state visit to China last year, he gave a rambling media interview in which he seemed to say that the EU had no interest in being “followers of the US” or defending Taiwan from Chinese aggression. He had to amend his words later.

That was Macron at his worst, an ad-lib, stand-up diplomat who ignores advice from the professionals in the Quai d’Orsay. I would argue, however, that the wider Macron argument – the EU must become more powerful or die – is the French President at his best.

Few other politicians in the world think ahead so much as Macron does. Democratic politics is mired in short-termism. Only autocrats like Xi or Putin can afford to think in terms of decades or centuries.

Macron likes to look around corners. He is often a better thinker than he is a diplomat or practical, daily politician.

His core argument – made in his Sorbonne speech last month and an interview with The Economist – is that Europe faces an unprecedented triple threat to its values, its security and its future prosperity.  

The rise of intolerant populist-nationalism threatens the values and institutions implanted in Europe after World War Two. The aggression of Russia and the detachment of the US (not just Donald Trump) threatens Europe’s security. The abandonment of global rules on fair trade – by Joe Biden’s US as well as Xi’s China – threatens to destroy European industry and sources of prosperity.

READ MORE: OPINION – Macron must earn the role of ’21st-century Churchill’

Civilisations, like people, are mortal, Macron says. Unless the EU and the wider democratic Europe (yes, you post-Brexit Britain) address these problems there is a danger that European civilisation (not just the EU experiment) could die.

Exaggerated? Maybe. But the problems are all real. Macron’s solutions are a powerful European defence alliance within Nato and targeted European protectionism and investment for the industries of the future.

The chances of those things being agreed by in time to make a difference are non-existent to small. In France, as elsewhere, these big “strategic” questions scarcely figure in popular concerns in the European election campaign.

Emmanuel Macron has now been president for seven years. His remaining three years in office will be something between disjointed and paralysed.

It is too early to write his political obituary but the Xi visit and the Sorbonne speech offer the likely main components. Macron will, I fear, be remembered as a visionary thinker and flawed diplomat/politician.

SHOW COMMENTS