SHARE
COPY LINK

REFERENDUMS IN SWITZERLAND

Swiss voters approve boost to pension payments

Swiss voters on Sunday overwhelmingly backed a proposal to increase pension payments, a move hailed as "historic" by backers at a time when the country's ageing population faces surging living expenses.

This photograph, taken on February 29, 2024 in Lausanne, shows an electoral board reading in French:
This photograph, taken on February 29, 2024 in Lausanne, shows an electoral board reading in French: "Our pension is no longer enough" ahead of two national referendums on retirement initiatives on Sunday. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP)
A call by trade unions to add a 13th monthly pension payment each year secured nearly 60 percent backing, final results showed.
 
But a separate vote to raise Switzerland’s retirement age to 66 from 65 was soundly rejected by three-quarters of voters.
 
The AVIVO pensioners’ association hailed the pension increase as “a historic victory”.
 
Switzerland’s Greens Party also celebrated a “significant victory… for the many retirees who will see their situations improve”.
 
While opinion polls had indicated strong popular support for the “Better living in retirement” proposal, suspense had lingered on whether it would secure the necessary majorities in most of Switzerland’s 26 cantons.
 
But in the end, the initiative won the double-majority needed to pass, with backing from 58.24 percent of voters and 16 cantons.
 
Ten cantons rejected the move, the results showed, while support soared above 70 percent in six cantons, including over 82 percent in the western Jura region.
 
 
Sunday’s vote marks the first time that Swiss voters have accepted a popular proposal to alter the country’s social security system, according to the ATS-Keystone news agency.
 
It is also the first time Swiss trade unions have succeeded in pushing through an initiative at the polls under the country’s direct democratic system.
 
Soaring costs’

The “Better living in retirement” proposal calls for a 13th monthly pension payment each year, similar to the “13th month” salary many employees receive in Switzerland and other European countries.

Monthly social security payments in Switzerland can rise to 2,450 Swiss francs ($2,780) for individuals and 3,675 francs for married couples.

READ ALSO: What is Switzerland’s 13th-month pension plan and why are they voting on it?  

The payments do not go far in a country consistently ranked among the most expensive in the world.

Rent for a typical two-bedroom apartment in Swiss cities is at least 3,000 francs, and a coffee costs upwards of five francs.

“There is a purchasing power crisis,” said Pierre-Yves Maillard, head of the Swiss Trade Union Federation (SGB) and part of the “yes” campaign.

“Retirees are seeing their living standards erode,” he told AFP last week.

“The cost of living just keeps soaring,” agreed Jakob Hauri, a retiree quoted by the campaign.

People power

Left-leaning parties supported the initiative, which was fiercely fought by right-wing and centrist parties, as well as the Swiss government and parliament.

The government warned the proposed hike would cost more than four billion Swiss francs a year, which would require tax increases and could threaten the financial stability of the social security system.

It also said there would be limited social benefit from the proposed change, which would hand additional payments to all pensioners, regardless of their financial situation.

“If the initiative passes, a lot of retirees will receive a 13th social security payment even though they don’t really need it,” the government warned.

But the Swiss Trade Union Federation (SGB) said Sunday’s vote results “clearly show that the government, a majority of the parliament and employers have for too long ignored the pension problem”.

Its chief, Pierre-Yves Maillard, told public broadcaster RTS on Sunday that the win was “a wonderful message to all those who have worked hard all of their lives”.

It is proof, he said, that “it is the people who have the power in Switzerland”.

Retirement age unchanged

A second issue on the ballot Sunday seeking to raise the retirement age was soundly rejected.

A full 74.72 percent of voters turned down the proposal by the youth branch of the right-wing Liberal Party to gradually raise the retirement age from 65 to 66 over the next decade, a moved aimed at ensuring full financing of the pension system.

A majority of voters in every Swiss canton rejected the proposal, which came less than two years after voters narrowly opted to raise the retirement age for women from 64 to 65, to match the retirement age for men.

Voter participation is generally low in Switzerland’s popular votes, which are held every few months, and rarely inches above 50 percent.

But Sunday’s issues sparked heated debate and participation reached more than 58 percent.

 

Member comments

  1. Overall the Swiss economy will benefit from pensioners eventual increase in spending and some reduction of other social support measures.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

Trump vs Harris: Swiss MPs argue over who would be better for Switzerland

With American VP Kamala Harris expected to get the Democratic Party’s nomination for president, Swiss politicians are divided about how beneficial — or not — she would be for Switzerland.

Trump vs Harris: Swiss MPs argue over who would be better for Switzerland

While it is certain that Kamala Harris and Donald Trump could not care less about Switzerland’s opinions of their political agenda, this does not prevent Swiss politicians from supporting one candidate over another.

That is because the outcome of any presidential election in the United States has always had broad global repercussions—impacting Switzerland as well.

The 2024 election will be no different.

Not so neutral

Generally speaking and based on past experiences, Switzerland’s government has always found a common language (which, in this case, is English) with any US president.

As the Federal Council said in November 2020, when asked for a comment about Trump’s election, “we want what is best for Switzerland,” adding that “Switzerland can get along with” whoever happens to be in the White House at the time.

Nevertheless, Swiss MPs are not quite as diplomatic (or neutral) in expressing their views of the US presidential candidates, and especially about whose policies are likely to be better for Switzerland.

Not surprisingly, their preferences are determined by whether they are to the right or left of the political spectrum, with those on the right supporting Republican candidates — in this case, Trump — while more liberal MPs favouring Harris, a Democrat.

‘Regulation-mad socialist’

It follows then that the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) favours Trump.

In an interview with the 20 Minuten news platform, the party’s MP Franz Grüter called Harris a ‘regulation-mad socialist,” pointing out that “it was always easier for Switzerland when Republicans were in power in the USA.”

Another SVP deputy, Roland Rino Büchel, said that “Democratic presidents harass our country almost systematically when they are in power.”

While he did not explain his assertion, Swiss banks were a target of tax litigation from 2008 to 2013, brought about by the US Department of Justice  under President Barack Obama. As a result of this legal action, Switzerland had to largely abandon banking secrecy and several Swiss banks were hit with heavy fines.

‘A better choice’

However, a number of other MPs are in Harris’ corner.

“Harris is a better choice,” said deputy Hans Jörg Rüegsegger, breaking ranks with his SVP colleagues.

“Trump doesn’t care about Switzerland,” he added. “Whether it’s immigration or social issues, Harris is certainly closer to our values than Trump.”

Elisabeth Schneider-Schneiter, a deputy from the Centre party, also supports Harris.

“She stands for an open USA, which makes its contribution to a functioning multilateralism. This is of utmost importance for a small economy like Switzerland.”

Trump, on the other hand, would be harmful to the Swiss export economy, among other things.

Additional trade barriers – such as tariffs – which Trump would impose “would make the US market less attractive for our export industry,” she added.

SHOW COMMENTS