SHARE
COPY LINK

REFERENDUMS IN SWITZERLAND

Swiss voters approve boost to pension payments

Swiss voters on Sunday overwhelmingly backed a proposal to increase pension payments, a move hailed as "historic" by backers at a time when the country's ageing population faces surging living expenses.

This photograph, taken on February 29, 2024 in Lausanne, shows an electoral board reading in French:
This photograph, taken on February 29, 2024 in Lausanne, shows an electoral board reading in French: "Our pension is no longer enough" ahead of two national referendums on retirement initiatives on Sunday. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP)
A call by trade unions to add a 13th monthly pension payment each year secured nearly 60 percent backing, final results showed.
 
But a separate vote to raise Switzerland’s retirement age to 66 from 65 was soundly rejected by three-quarters of voters.
 
The AVIVO pensioners’ association hailed the pension increase as “a historic victory”.
 
Switzerland’s Greens Party also celebrated a “significant victory… for the many retirees who will see their situations improve”.
 
While opinion polls had indicated strong popular support for the “Better living in retirement” proposal, suspense had lingered on whether it would secure the necessary majorities in most of Switzerland’s 26 cantons.
 
But in the end, the initiative won the double-majority needed to pass, with backing from 58.24 percent of voters and 16 cantons.
 
Ten cantons rejected the move, the results showed, while support soared above 70 percent in six cantons, including over 82 percent in the western Jura region.
 
 
Sunday’s vote marks the first time that Swiss voters have accepted a popular proposal to alter the country’s social security system, according to the ATS-Keystone news agency.
 
It is also the first time Swiss trade unions have succeeded in pushing through an initiative at the polls under the country’s direct democratic system.
 
Soaring costs’

The “Better living in retirement” proposal calls for a 13th monthly pension payment each year, similar to the “13th month” salary many employees receive in Switzerland and other European countries.

Monthly social security payments in Switzerland can rise to 2,450 Swiss francs ($2,780) for individuals and 3,675 francs for married couples.

READ ALSO: What is Switzerland’s 13th-month pension plan and why are they voting on it?  

The payments do not go far in a country consistently ranked among the most expensive in the world.

Rent for a typical two-bedroom apartment in Swiss cities is at least 3,000 francs, and a coffee costs upwards of five francs.

“There is a purchasing power crisis,” said Pierre-Yves Maillard, head of the Swiss Trade Union Federation (SGB) and part of the “yes” campaign.

“Retirees are seeing their living standards erode,” he told AFP last week.

“The cost of living just keeps soaring,” agreed Jakob Hauri, a retiree quoted by the campaign.

People power

Left-leaning parties supported the initiative, which was fiercely fought by right-wing and centrist parties, as well as the Swiss government and parliament.

The government warned the proposed hike would cost more than four billion Swiss francs a year, which would require tax increases and could threaten the financial stability of the social security system.

It also said there would be limited social benefit from the proposed change, which would hand additional payments to all pensioners, regardless of their financial situation.

“If the initiative passes, a lot of retirees will receive a 13th social security payment even though they don’t really need it,” the government warned.

But the Swiss Trade Union Federation (SGB) said Sunday’s vote results “clearly show that the government, a majority of the parliament and employers have for too long ignored the pension problem”.

Its chief, Pierre-Yves Maillard, told public broadcaster RTS on Sunday that the win was “a wonderful message to all those who have worked hard all of their lives”.

It is proof, he said, that “it is the people who have the power in Switzerland”.

Retirement age unchanged

A second issue on the ballot Sunday seeking to raise the retirement age was soundly rejected.

A full 74.72 percent of voters turned down the proposal by the youth branch of the right-wing Liberal Party to gradually raise the retirement age from 65 to 66 over the next decade, a moved aimed at ensuring full financing of the pension system.

A majority of voters in every Swiss canton rejected the proposal, which came less than two years after voters narrowly opted to raise the retirement age for women from 64 to 65, to match the retirement age for men.

Voter participation is generally low in Switzerland’s popular votes, which are held every few months, and rarely inches above 50 percent.

But Sunday’s issues sparked heated debate and participation reached more than 58 percent.

 

Member comments

  1. Overall the Swiss economy will benefit from pensioners eventual increase in spending and some reduction of other social support measures.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

Could Geneva be first Swiss canton to grant foreign residents more voting rights?

Voters in the country’s most "international" canton Geneva will soon have their say on whether non-Swiss citizens living in their midst should have more political rights.

Could Geneva be first Swiss canton to grant foreign residents more voting rights?

Foreigners are not allowed to vote on national level anywhere in Switzerland.

Though there had been attempts in the past to change this rule, the latest such move was turned down by legislators in 2022.

However, five cantons are permitting foreign residents to cast their votes in local referendums and elections: Geneva, Vaud, Fribourg, Neuchâtel, and Jura. Conditions vary from one canton to another, but in all cases a certain length of stay and a residence permit are required.

(In Zurich, a similar move was rejected in 2023).

Of the five cantons, only Neuchâtel and Jura authorise foreign residents to vote on cantonal level in addition to communal one; in the others, they can cast municipal ballots only. 

Additionally, three other cantons have similar laws on their books, but they this legislation remains mostly inactive.

Basel-City, Graubünden, and Appenzell-Ausserrhoden have authorised their communes to introduce the right to vote, the right to elect, and the right to be elected for their non-Swiss residents. 

However, only few of the communes in these cantons have actually introduced these measures.

Wait…Geneva’s foreigners already have the right to vote?

Yes, they have had this right since 2005, but only on municipal level.

However, this could change on June 9th, when Geneva residents will go to the polls to weigh in on an initiative launched by the trade unions and political left, calling for foreigners who have lived in the canton for at least eight years, to be able to vote and stand as candidates for political offices at the cantonal level.

This ‘upgrade’ to the cantonal voting rights is important, supporters argue, because it would enable foreigners to have more political impact.

“Municipal votes are quite rare, and the issues at stake are relatively limited,” the initiative committee said.

Therefore, “access to the cantonal vote will allow these same people to express their views on wider subjects that affect them on a daily basis.”

Is this  measure likely to be accepted?

No reliable forecasts exist at this point.

And while foreigners constitute nearly 40 percent of Geneva’s population — the highest proportion in Switzerland —  it will be up to Swiss citizens to decide on the outcome.

However, some members of the Geneva parliament are urging the ‘no’ vote on June 9th.

“No canton, no country, provides such generous rights to their foreigners,” the MPs from the centre parties pointed out in an interview with Tribune de Genève over the weekend.

(Neuchâtel and Jura allow voting, but not standing for election, at cantonal level).

“The only path for foreigners to obtain full political rights is through naturalisation,” the MPs added.

SHOW COMMENTS