SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

EU’s new migrant deal is an ‘historic failure’, charities warn

The EU's new migration deal "will cost more lives at sea", the Sea-Watch rescue charity said Wednesday, in a statement it said was backed by more than a dozen NGOs.

EU's new migrant deal is an 'historic failure', charities warn
Picture taken on August 3, 2023 shows some of the 266 migrants rescued by members of the Spanish NGO Proactiva Open Arms when they were crossing the Mediterranean sea on little boats off the Libyan coast. (Photo by Matias CHIOFALO / AFP)

“Not one single life will be saved by this decision. This agreement is a historic failure and a bow to the right-wing parties of Europe,” the charities’ statement read.

Sea-Watch is one of several organisations operating ships in the Mediterranean to rescue migrants who try to reach Europe on small boats.

The central Med crossing, between North Africa and Italy and Malta, is the world’s deadliest migration route, with more than 2,200 deaths this year alone, according to the UN.

The Sea-Watch statement — also signed by the Alarm Phone migrant hotline, Sea-Eye and SOS Humanity among others — says the EU reform agreement is “a turning point and one of the most blatant displays of disrespect to human
rights and the suffering along European borders”.

“With the agreement on the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), the EU has decided to formalise a status quo where violence, neglect, torture and leaving people to die are every day practice,” it said.

It said the bloc “missed the chance to agree on core mechanisms to put an end to the dying at sea”.

“Instead, the EU institutions have decided to actively gut the rights of those seeking protection, legalising the violations of EU asylum law by the member states,” it said.

The deal would “restrict access to protection in Europe by introducing fast-track asylum procedures at the border to speed up returns”, it said.

It said the plans would “isolate refugees from the rest of society, detain them in remote camps and prevent any form of integration”.

It added that the agreement offered “no safe and legal routes” to seek protection in the European Union.

“All of this will force more people to try to flee by sea, and choose ever more dangerous routes. Again and again, more lives will be lost,” it said.

The agreement still has to be formally adopted by the European Council and European Parliament.

EU member state Hungary has notably rejected a compulsory solidarity mechanism which is to be set up, providing for a certain number of migrant relocations spread between other EU countries.

Countries refusing to take in migrants would provide a financial or material contribution to those that do — something Budapest fiercely opposes.

UN supports the deal

However the United Nations refugee chief hailed the agreement reached by EU countries and lawmakers to overhaul the bloc’s laws on handling asylum seekers and migrants as “a very positive step”.

“Congrats to the EU and @EU_Commission for reaching a political agreement,” Filippo Grandi said on X, formerly Twitter.

“It is a very positive step. Now to its implementation! UNHCR stands ready to advise and support,” added the UN’s High Commissioner for Refugees, saluting the “perseverance and leadership” of European Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson in thrashing out the deal.

Member comments

  1. Destroy the boats at port before they take migrants and save their life in a human way. Stop the slave/ human trade and the criminal enterprise that feed on it.

  2. The EU and the UK cannot cope with the level of illegal immigrants trying to get to Europe and the UK by sea.
    The irony is – some would probably qualify as legal immigrants if they applied by the legal process.
    The people who are complaining about rights etc are correct in saying the real problem with the system is the time it takes to process the applications. The UK has the same problem.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORK PERMITS

Is Sweden meeting its 30-day work permit target for high-skilled foreigners?

Three months after the Swedish Migration Agency rolled out a new system for work permits, how long are highly qualified foreign professionals having to wait for a decision?

Is Sweden meeting its 30-day work permit target for high-skilled foreigners?

More than 7,750 work permit applications have been submitted to Sweden’s Migration Agency since a new system designed to speed up waiting times for skilled workers was implemented.

The new system, rolled out on January 29th, divides workers into four different categories depending on their profession. It was introduced after complaints about long waits for both first-time and renewed work permits and promised to process the top category, “A”, within 30 days.

Category A applications are those already classified as “highly qualified” under the Standard for Swedish Classification of Occupations (SSYK), and include leadership roles, roles requiring higher university education, and roles requiring university education or equivalent.

A Migration Agency spokesperson told The Local that a total of 95 percent of complete work permit applications sent in by highly qualified workers since January 29th were processed within 30 days, with a median handling time of 14 days, according to figures from April 15th.

“Our ambition is to decide cases for highly qualified labour within 30 days – sometimes it happens that the application isn’t complete and that can make the processing time longer,” the spokesperson said.

By mid-April, the Migration Agency had processed 4,461 complete applications, 550 incomplete applications and 423 applications for permanent residency which were complete but had to wait for a decision because the applicant’s previous permit hadn’t yet expired.

Around 77 percent of incomplete applications were processed within 30 days.

A Migration Agency spokesperson told The Local that there may be various reasons why an application is incomplete, but “common mistakes” include passports lacking a signature, incorrect information about accommodation when needed, no or not enough information about the applicant’s insurances, or no statement from the trade union about working conditions.

The spokesperson also said that the four percent of complete applications that didn’t get processed within a month were delayed because of, for example, the applicant failing to visit an embassy to show their passport before the deadline, having a criminal record in Sweden that required further investigation of their application, or the security police blocking their application.

SHOW COMMENTS