SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

How Swedish PM’s public event became a breeding ground for disinformation

Sweden's government described video clips purporting to show Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson saying Israel has a right to genocide as 'inaccurate' and part of a 'disinformation campaign'. And a student was falsely identified as a gang leader at the same event.

How Swedish PM's public event became a breeding ground for disinformation
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, leader of the conservative Moderate Party. Photo: Adam Ihse/TT

The video clips in question originate from a question and answer session Kristersson held in Gothenburg on Tuesday when he begins to talk about the Israel Hamas conflict and appears to misspeak.

“Right now, there are circulating clips with inaccurate translations and distortion of what the Swedish Prime Minister said during an open meeting in Gothenburg,” Carl-Oskar Bohlin, Civil Defence Minister, said in a post to X, formerly Twitter.

“The purpose is obvious: To damage Sweden’s image abroad and contribute to further polarisation and division,” Bohlin added.

At one point during the talk, Kristersson begins to talk about the Israel-Hamas conflict, but misspeaks as he attempts to say that Sweden and the EU are “united on that Israel has a right to defence, within the framework of international law”.

However, instead of the word for “defence” (försvar in Swedish), he first says “folk” before correcting himself.

Some in the crowd take this to mean that Kristersson was about to say folkmord, or genocide, which also is similar to the word for international law – folkrätt.

“Does Israel have a right to genocide?” and “we heard it” members of the crowd can be heard shouting.

The whole session has been described as rowdy, with protesters and members of the crowd shouting and interrupting Kristersson during the talk.

Kristersson wrote in a post later on Facebook that the talk had been interrupted by “political saboteurs”, seemingly there only to vent “their anger at the political position of Sweden and the EU on the conflict in the Middle East”.

Sweden’s foreign minister Tobias Billström said in another post to X, that the country saw “hostile actors trying to falsely distort the words of our PM.”

“Do not contribute to this. What he said is that Sweden and the EU stand firmly behind Israel’s right to defend itself,” Billström said.

Bohlin said the narrative was being reinforced by “actors involved in the disinformation campaign related to social services in Sweden”.

In 2022, the country was targeted in a vast disinformation campaign claiming its social services were “kidnapping Muslim children” and placing them in Christian homes, leading Swedish authorities to publicly deny the allegations.

Also after the event in Gothenburg on Tuesday, Moderate politician Hanif Bali took to X, wrongly identifying one of the Palestine activists present as a known gang leader.

The false information was shared by many right-wing pundits on social media, and was printed in the Svenska Dagbladet newspaper in an editorial by Swedish journalist Peter Wennblad. 

The activist was later correctly identified as Bachar Garar, a peace and conflict student at the Linné University without a criminal record or any known links to gang crime. Garar works in elderly care and at a hamburger restaurant, and has previously been on the front page of the Swedish Armed Forces’ magazine Försvarets forum, after doing his military service with the Swedish Life Guards regiment in Kungsängen.

“It’s frustrating that a known politician shares propaganda without double checking his source. At university we have learned to be careful about what information we share,” Garar told the left-wing newspaper Proletären, which was the first newspaper to interview him.

“What he wrote about me harmed my family and myself, people think I’m a gang leader. I am scared that I may be attacked because people think I’m a gang criminal. It damages my reputation at university. I only want justice for my people, like so many others,” he said.

Svenska Dagbladet later issued a correction and an apology to Garar. Bali removed his comments on X, writing that the gang leader did not take part in the meeting and that “being wrongly labelled a Palestine activist is serious. The statement is thus false and deleted”. He didn’t mention Garar.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS