SHARE
COPY LINK

ENVIRONMENT

Sweden Democrats make U-turn and agree to support government climate targets

The Sweden Democrats, who the coalition government relies on for support, have in a U-turn for the party given their backing to Sweden’s zero-emission target for 2045.

Sweden Democrats make U-turn and agree to support government climate targets
From left to right: Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari, Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, Energy and Business Minister Ebba Busch and Sweden Democrat climate and environment spokesperson Martin Kinnunen. Photo: Fredrik Sandberg/TT

“Unlike before, the whole bloc of parties supporting the government is now backing Sweden’s climate goals,” Climate and Environment Minister Romina Pourmokhtari said in a press conference.

The four parties – the Moderates, Christian Democrats, Liberals and Sweden Democrats, also known as the Tidö parties after the country manor where they signed their coalition agreement – will now work together with the goal of reaching net-zero in 2045, she added.

“All parties in the governing bloc are now also backing the national interim targets, which are important checkpoints along the way,” Pourmokhtari said.

The U-turn from the Sweden Democrats means that Sweden’s parliament is now fully united in support of the climate goals, which are based on three principles: they should have an international perspective with a focus on reducing global emissions, they should incorporate developing technology with more fossil-free electricity and they should be combined with economic growth.

“Climate policy should be effective, it should be tolerated by citizens and it should create jobs and growth. We don’t want a policy of shutting things down,” Sweden Democrat spokesperson on climate and environmental policy, Martin Kinnunen said, before adding that work to review the goals is ongoing.

“There will be an overview of the interim targets and the Climate Policy Council will also be given new assignments,” he said.

One example is the 2030 interim goal for transport, which the government’s investigator John Hassler wants to replace with a new goal focusing on electrification.

“We think it’s good that that’s being reviewed, and if you want to review something then that’s something you strive to change,” Kinnunen said.

He dismissed the suggestion that the Sweden Democrats’ decision to give their backing to the 2045 climate goal was a concession for the party, describing it as “at its foundation a good agreement for Sweden and for the collaborating parties”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS