SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Why is Switzerland being called a ‘banana republic’?

Switzerland was referred to as a "banana republic", after news of the errors in Sunday's election vote count came out. But is this depiction justified?

Why is Switzerland being called a 'banana republic'?
Yes, we have bananas. Image by Alicja from Pixabay

“The Federal Statistical Office carried out quality checks on its electoral statistics and noted an error in the calculation of party strengths aggregated at the national level,” the government statement said on Wednesday.

READ ALSO: Swiss admit election count errors

While such miscalculation, attributed to “incorrect programming of the data import software” in three cantons, is rare in Switzerland, it nevertheless evoked some strongly worded reactions from the country’s politicians and media alike.

The most critical one came from a weekly magazine, Die Welwoche.

“Can you actually make yourself more ridiculous as a state than by making mistakes when calculating the election results?” it wrote. “Are we on the way to becoming a banana republic?”

This term is usually used when describing a poor and politically precarious  nation (with or without bananas), rather than wealthy and stable Switzerland.

You would think that such a derogatory remark would spark outrage from the magazine’s readers, most of whom are supporters of the right-wing Swiss People’s Party, which won most seats in Sunday’s parliamentary election.
But the opposite happened.

In the comments section of the digital version of the magazine, a number of readers actually agreed with this assessment.

“We are not on the way to becoming a banana republic. We have been this way for a long time already,” one said.

Another commentator added: “We are a banana republic like Germany. It’s a shame about the formerly neutral and sensible Switzerland.”

“Who can actually believe anything that comes from Bern, the capital of the banana republic?” yet another reader pointed out.

As the article was published this week, and not on April 1st, we can assume it is legitimate and not a dubious joke.

And Die Weltwoche’s comparison of Switzerland to a banana republic is not exactly unprecedented.

In March, when the news broke of Credit Suisse’s collapse, Peter V. Kunz, a professor of economic law at the University of Bern, said that  “foreign investors may wonder if Switzerland is a banana republic where the rule of law doesn’t apply.”

Whether or not these depictions accurately depict Switzerland is a different matter.

But they have certainly gone bananas.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Swiss earmark 10 million francs for UNRWA in Gaza

Switzerland is proposing to give $11 million to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, specifically for tackling the humanitarian crisis in Gaza triggered by the war between Israel and Hamas.

Swiss earmark 10 million francs for UNRWA in Gaza

The government’s proposal, announced Wednesday after weeks of procrastination, represents half of the amount which was initially set to be paid to the UNRWA (The United Nations Relief and Works Agency) in 2024.

“Switzerland’s 10 million Swiss francs contribution to UNRWA will be restricted to Gaza and will cover the most pressing basic needs, such as food, water, shelter, basic healthcare and logistics,” a government statement said.

Switzerland “is fully aware of the critical nature of this situation and recognises the urgent need for action”.

UNRWA, which coordinates nearly all aid to Gaza, has been in crisis since January when Israel accused about a dozen of its 13,000 Gaza employees of being involved in the October 7th Hamas attack on Israel.

This led many donor nations, including the United States and Switzerland, to abruptly suspend funding to the agency, threatening its efforts to deliver desperately-needed aid in Gaza, where the UN has warned of an impending famine.

An independent review group of UNRWA, led by French former foreign minister Catherine Colonna, found some “neutrality-related issues” but said Israel had yet to provide evidence for its chief allegations.

In making its decision, the Swiss government said it “drew on the analysis of the Colonna report and coordination with other donors”.

The government’s decision must still be submitted to parliament’s foreign affairs committees for consultation.

On April 30th, the Swiss head of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, said that of the $450 million in funding that had been frozen by donors, $267 million was still suspended, the bulk of it by Washington.

Gaza’s bloodiest-ever war began following Hamas’s unprecedented October 7th attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of more than 1,170 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of Israeli official figures.

Vowing to destroy Hamas, Israel has conducted a retaliatory offensive that has killed more than 34,800 people in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry.

Switzerland “reiterates its call for a humanitarian ceasefire, unhindered access for emergency aid to Gaza, compliance with international humanitarian law, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages,” the government said.

SHOW COMMENTS