SHARE
COPY LINK

SWEDEN DEMOCRATS

Leading Sweden Democrat criticised for Brussels attack tweet

A tweet by Sweden Democrat MP Jessica Stegrud's following the terror attack in Brussels which killed two Swedes has been harshly criticised by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and the leader of the Social Democrats, Magdalena Andersson.

Leading Sweden Democrat criticised for Brussels attack tweet
Jessica Stegrud on stage in Sölvesborg this summer before a speech by Sweden Democrat party leader Jimmie Åkesson. Photo: Johan Nilsson/TT

The Euro 2024 qualifier between Belgium and Sweden, which took place in Brussels, was called off at half time on Monday night after two Swedish football fans were murdered and another injured in a terror attack a few kilometres away.

Fredrik Reinfeldt, former Moderate prime minister and current chairman of the Swedish Football Association, attended the game.

After the attack, Stegrud wrote a now-deleted post on X, formerly known as Twitter, which received harsh criticism.

“Reinfeldt was given a police escort out of the arena – after two (probably) Swedish football fans were killed by an islamist. He, if anyone, should have been forced to stay there with no police protection at all. My thoughts go to the dead and their families. My contempt goes to all the politicians – including FR [Fredrik Reinfeldt] – who laid the foundations for this.”

Stegrud, who was a Sweden Democrat MEP before entering the Swedish parliament last year, joined the party’s leader Jimmie Åkesson on the campaign trail prior to the 2022 election and has been widely touted as his possible successor. She was listed as Sweden’s fourth most influential politician on social media by Medieakademin’s 2022 power barometer.

Her criticism of Reinfeldt and her accusation that he “laid the foundations for this”, is most likely a reference to a now-famous summer speech, often referred to as the öppna era hjärtan (open your hearts) speech.

Reinfeldt in August 2014 called for Swedes to “show patience and open their hearts” to refugees seeking safety in the country. In the 2014 election which took place one month after the speech, around eight percent of former Moderate voters switched to the Sweden Democrats, who climbed from 4.8 percent in 2010 to 12.9 percent in 2014, becoming Sweden’s third-largest party. 

At a press conference on Tuesday about the Brussels attack, Ulf Kristersson commented on Stegrud’s tweet.

“A lack of judgement,” he said. ” This is not the time for carelessness, recklessness or comments of that nature. This is not the time for making any of this party politics at all.”

“It’s time to come to our senses, I think, and think about Swedish security.”

When asked how the Sweden Democrats – who Kristersson’s government relies on for support – should respond to the post, Kristersson did not want to comment.

“The Sweden Democrats will have to handle that themselves.”

Social Democrat leader and former prime minister Magdalena Andersson criticised Kristersson for not acting on the post, pointing out that Kristersson was a minister in the Reinfeldt government which Stegrud expressed contempt for.

“That tweet is also aimed at Ulf Kristersson,” Andersson said, adding that she believes the responsible thing to do would be to tone down the rhetoric and not risk fuelling the already tense situation.

She also argued that by allowing the Sweden Democrats to support his government, Kristersson is responsible for giving them more power.

“These tweets we’re seeing from Sweden Democrats carry a different weight now than they did before they were in the position of power Ulf Kristersson has put them in.”

Andersson said that she was “shocked” when she saw the tweet.

The Sweden Democrats’ group leader in parliament, Linda Lindberg, said in written comment to TT that, as far as her party is concerned, the tweet requires no discussion.

“The security situation is worse than it has been for a long time. Shootings are taking place on Swedish streets. Innocent Swedish football fans are being murdered by Islamists. Given the situation, some people are choosing to get fired up over an MP who expressed her frustration over the situation on social media. I think that’s ridiculous.”

Stegrud has deleted the original tweet and reposted a more toned-down version, which still criticises Reinfeldt for “getting more protection than others” and accuses him for “laying the political groundwork for this accelerating insecurity”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS