SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

EU judges reject bid to impose visas on American tourists

The European Commission has been under pressure to suspend the exemption that allows US travellers to enter the EU without the need for a visa, but judges at the EU Court of Justice have now ruled it doesn't have to.

EU judges reject bid to impose visas on American tourists
Why the EU won't suspend visa free travel for US visitors. (Photo by JOHN THYS / AFP)

What’s the story?

The European Union has a list of countries whose citizens can travel to the EU / Schengen area for 90 days in any 180-day period without needing a visa.

These countries include the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. Usually, this is based on the fact that EU citizens are not required to get a visa when they travel to those countries. In other words it’s based on reciprocity. 

So US citizens can benefit from these rules and they do not require a visa when they travel to the EU or Schengen area countries like Switzerland and Norway. However, while most EU citizens can travel to the US for up to 90 days without a visa (although they do need an ESTA visa waiver), this has not been true for all EU nationalities.

EU rules state that if a non-EU country decides to introduce a visa requirement for citizens of one or more EU member states, then the European Commission can propose to suspend the visa exemption for their nationals too.

In 2014, the EU raised with the US the issue of non-reciprocity of visa waivers concerning Bulgarian, Croatian, Cypriot and Romanian citizens (at the time Poland was also affected, but since 2019 Polish citizens can travel to the US under the visa-waiver system).

Under EU legislation, if a third country does not lift the visa requirement within 24 months from the notification, the Commission can propose a legal act to suspend the exemption for its nationals for 12 months.

Because the US did not change its approach, in 2017 and 2020 the European Parliament had called on the Commission to reintroduce the visa requirement for US citizens – effectively meaning that the millions of American tourists who head to Europe each year would need to go through the process of getting a visa prior to travel.

“The discrimination that Bulgarians, Croatians (Croatia has since become part of the Schengen area and now benefits from the US visa-waiver system), Cypriots and Romanians experience when travelling to the US is unacceptable. Respecting the fundamental principle of solidarity among EU members, we call on the Commission to act as established in European legislation and table a proposal to suspend the visa exemption for US nationals,” Juan Fernando López Aguilar, chair of the European parliament’s civil liberties committee, said back in 2020.

But the Commission refused.

It argued that given the close relations between the EU and the US and the importance of US tourists for the EU economy, the suspension would have had “significant negative impacts in a wide range of policy areas and sectors”.

In terms of the number of tourist arrivals and tourist spending, the US is the most lucrative market for the EU. In 2016 American visitors spent a combined total of 74 million nights throughout EU countries. France is the number one EU country for US visitors followed by Italy and Germany.

In 2016, tourists from the US carried out 27 million trips to Europe.

Given the lack of action, the European Parliament decided to take the Commission to the EU Court of Justice.

What was the verdict?

In the judgement passed on Tuesday, the Court ruled that the Commission was not required to suspend the visa exemption for US citizens just because of lack of reciprocity.

“The Commission enjoys political discretion to decide whether such a suspension is appropriate,” said the Court.

According to the EU judges, the Commission is not automatically required to suspend the visa exemption, but must take into account a series of factors, including the consequences the suspension may cause – in this case mainly the economic importance of millions of US tourists as well as the impact on certain policy areas. The Court therefore dismissed the Parliament’s action.

“The Commission did not exceed its discretion in taking the view that it was not required to suspend the exemption of United States nationals from the visa requirement, with the result that it cannot be accused of having failed to act,” read the judgement.

The US visa waiver programme ESTA covers citizens from Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium Brunei, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, San Marino, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The other EU nationalities are still excluded.

Under the planned ETIAS scheme visitors from the US and other non-EU countries will have to pay in future for a visa waiver to visit EU and Schengen area countries.

This means that American tourists coming to the EU will be required to get travel authorisation through an ETIAS visa waiver ahead of the trip – using an online system. 

This article was produced in collaboration with Europe Street news.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

TRAVEL NEWS

Why has Switzerland become so bad for flight delays and cancellations?

Though Switzerland is known for punctuality, efficiency, and reliability, its national airline and largest international airport did not live up to this reputation during the peak travel months, a new study shows.

Why has Switzerland become so bad for flight delays and cancellations?

SWISS and Zurich Airport enjoy a good international reputation, regularly ranking at the top of various passenger-satisfaction surveys.

But not this year.

A new analysis by the passenger rights portal Flightright raises doubts about the reliability of the two flagships of Swiss aviation.

The portal compared the 20 European airlines with the most departures between June 20th and September 4th of this year, looking specifically at the cancellations and delays of the largest European airlines and at the most important airports during the 2024 summer holidays.

What did the survey find?

Switzerland recorded both the most cancellations (2.5 percent) and the most delays (39 percent), just ahead of its neighbours Germany (2.4 percent) and Austria (1.5 percent).

Furthermore, 43 percent of SWISS flights arrived more than 15 minutes late — the third-worst result of the 20 airlines examined.

As for European airports, Zurich is in the fourth place in terms of cancellations and delays, affecting 2.37 percent of the air traffic during the months examined by Flightright.

To be fair, Switzerland is not the only poor performer in the survey.

According to the platform’s spokesperson, Feyza Türkön, Germany and Austria, along with the Lufthansa group airlines (of which SWISS is a member) were also “heavily affected by flight cancellations.”

‘External causes’

When asked to explain the reasons for the poor performance, both SWISS and the airport pointed to events beyond their control.

“Three-quarters of all departure delays are due to external factors over which we, as an airline have no direct influence,” a spokesperson for SWISS pointed out.

“At Zurich airport, for example, the wind and a complex runway system with intersecting take-off and landing strips regularly leads to a significant reduction in capacity.”

In addition, Zurich has one of the world’s most restrictive operating regulations with a ban on night flights from 11:30 pm. to 6 am, which affects overall operations.
 
As for the Zurich Airport’s poor results, “the punctuality rate in the summer fell compared to previous months due to drastic regulations by European air traffic control, the many thunderstorms, as well as the tense geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe and the Middle East,” its management said.

There were also other reasons that contributed to the poor rating: in the middle of the summer travel season, both Zurich and Geneva airports have had to deal with various glitches, forcing them to cancel or delay a number of flights.

On July 5th in Zurich, for instance, a bug in the software of Skyguide, Switzerland, air traffic control system, led to massive restrictions lasting about an hour and a half, affecting 68 flights: 18 takeoffs and 19 landings had to be canceled, while 31 flights were delayed for up to two hours.

In all, 1,900 passengers were affected by the system’s breakdown.

In order to reduce delays, numerous short-term measures were implemented by SWISS, together with Skyguide and luggage handler Swissport, “which are already having an effect. However, the greatest lever for reducing delays lies in long-term measures, which unfortunately sometimes take many years to be implemented,” the airline said.

SHOW COMMENTS