SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS

Why is Austria so set on making cash payments a constitutional right?

The Austrian government is moving forward with plans to guarantee the right of people in Austria to pay by cash in the constitution, but the EU says it’s not sure what the point is. What's going on?

Why is Austria so set on making cash payments a constitutional right?
As card and digital payments become ever more common, the Austrian government still wants to guarantee cash use - constitutionally. (Photo: JEAN-SEBASTIEN EVRARD / AFP)

What’s happening?

It may sound a little hard to believe, but one of the top agenda items for the Austrian government in recent weeks has everything to do with Bargeld. Yes, you read that right – Austria is focusing on cash, and it wants to make paying with banknotes and coins a constitutional right.

Chancellor Karl Nehammer, of the conservative Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), announced last week that he wants to go forward with a constitutional cash plan.

“We understand that cash is a very important theme to people,” Nehammer said Thursday. “It’s important to me that cash use is constitutionally guaranteed.”

This week, Constitutional Minister Karoline Edtstadler followed that up by saying that plans are already underway to make the amendment and pass associated laws that would uphold the new constitutional measure.

“It is now important to work out the specific legal framework,” she said, while also hinting that card users should still benefit from more modern payment methods.

“Everyone should be able to decide freely and anonymously how they pay.” 

READ ALSO: Cash in Austria to become a constitutional right, vows chancellor

Why is this so important to Austria?

About 70 percent of transactions performed in Austria are still made in cash – one of the highest rates in the Eurozone. That’s a higher rate even than neighbouring and fellow German-speaking Germany – which also has the reputation of a cash-obsessed country – 62 percent of transactions there are still performed in cash.

But Austria handily wins the cash count when it comes to ATM availability. While German has about 66 ATMs per 100,000 people, Austria has 97. People in the country also withdraw about €47 billion in cash from those ATMs every year.

Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer, who wants to guarantee a right to cash payment in the Austrian constitution. But the EU says European law already guarantees this. (Photo by ATTILA KISBENEDEK / AFP)

A big reason for this comes down to another cultural obsession – privacy. 

According to one survey by payment platform Paysafe, over half of Austrians do not like to give over any data while paying.

READ ALSO: Why is cash so important to Austrians?

Politically, the issue of cash has come up again too.

Austrian politicians have tried to constitutionally guarantee cash before in 2019. That measure failed, but since the Covid-19 pandemic made digital payments a lot more common, politicians think now may be the time to act to preserve cash.

The far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) has previously called for a referendum on enshrining cash as a protected means of payment into the constitution, while the Social Democrats (SPÖ) want a law passed guaranteeing an ATM in every community.

What’s the reaction from the EU?

Austria is a member of the Eurozone, which is governed by international treaties and European law rather than national law.

That’s a big reason why the European Commission’s representative in Austria, Martin Selmayr, says he doesn’t see the point of constitutional protection, saying it “won’t add much”.

That’s because European law, which governs monetary policy and the euro, already guarantees cash as legal tender – meaning that people in Austria already have the right to have it accepted when paying. In Selmayr’s view, the government can pass a constitutional amendment to guarantee it but it will mostly be for show.

What happens next?

A constitutional amendment in Austria requires a two-thirds majority to pass.

That means that both government parties – the ÖVP and the Greens – would need to be on the same page about it. The Chancellor is from the ÖVP but the Greens have yet to weigh in substantively.

If the entire government is onside, the government will still need support from either the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) or the centre-left Social Democrats (SPÖ) to pass the measure – meaning the one or both of them could push for more concessions.

Even if the amendment passes, the government will have to pass laws that uphold it, and it’s not clear what those are supposed to be. Although the SPÖ want a law passed guaranteeing an ATM in every community, the Chancellor says such a request is “unrealistic” – so it remains to be seen how such an amendment would work in practice.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

Why does Austria rank so badly for press freedom?

Between political scandals and a decreasing media market, Austria has consistently ranked low in analyses of worldwide press freedom, but it has reached its lowest point this year.

Why does Austria rank so badly for press freedom?

When we think about countries where there are issues with press freedom, it’s usually the places that are war zones or dictatorships that come to mind. So the fact that Austria ranks only 32nd in the latest Reporters Without Borders (RSF) press freedom index may seem surprising to many people.

This is the country’s worst result to date, as it slipped from the 29th position it held last year. In 2024, Austria ranks in the middle of the countries classified as “satisfactory,” behind Moldova and ahead of Mauritania. Only eight countries are rated as having a “good” situation. The 22nd edition of the Press Freedom Index covers 180 countries worldwide.

According to Fritz Hausjell, President of RSF Austria, there are many reasons why Austria has fallen behind. The judiciary is investigating “highly problematic close relationships and suspected corrupt practices between the governing party ÖVP and several major media outlets”, he said, according to an ORF report. In addition, the judiciary is investigating the far-right FPÖ’s role in possible advertising corruption.

“In Austria, press freedom has been undermined by various political pressures or restrictions on access to information. Violence at public events prevented journalists from reporting freely”, RSF said.

READ ALSO: How Austria has tightened laws to prevent political corruption

Small market and political influences

“With just a dozen major outlets, the media market is small and very concentrated”, according to the RSF report. Additionally, tabloids have the largest readership, and there have been many attempts to influence both state and privately-owned media, with RSF calling the practice “constant”.

“Some politicians are suspected of having used public funds to buy favourable coverage in the tabloid media, while others have tried to intervene by directly going to editorial offices, such as former Chancellor Sebastian Kurz. He was forced to resign in 2021 due to suspicions of buying positive coverage in a privately owned newspaper. Journalists are sometimes the targets of political attacks coming from the extremes”, the report stated.

There have been significant scandals after corruption allegations between politicians and the media.

Most recently, prosecutors said an investigation into several former government members for alleged bribery, corruption, and breach of trust was opened in mid-April. Herbert Kickl, the hardline leader of Austria’s right-wing Freedom Party (FPOe)—currently leading polls ahead of elections expected in September—is suspected of commissioning adverts and paying for them with public money.

READ ALSO: The Kurz corruption scandal exposes Austria’s press freedom problems

In late 2021, a major media graft scandal erupted in the Alpine country. Austria’s former Chancellor Sebastian Kurz and his inner circle were accused of using public funds to pay for polls skewed to boost his image on Austrian tabloid media. It eventually led to Kurz’s resignation and exit from politics.

Of course, one of the country’s most infamous political scandals, the so-called Ibizagate that blew up in 2019, also shows Austrian leaders’ and major media’s murky underground connections. At the time, a leaked video showed then FPÖ leader and vice-chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache in a 2017 meeting on the Spanish resort island of Ibiza with a woman posing as the niece of a Russian oligarch.

Among the many controversial statements, Strache was filmed discussing the possibility of the woman buying Austria’s most-read tabloid, Kronen Zeitung, and making its editorial line more pro-FPOe.

READ MORE: ‘Ibizagate’ – What you need to know about the Austrian political corruption scandal

But it’s not just the tabloid media that has shrouded connections to those in power. In 2022, two prominent Austrian journalists, editors of reputed media such as Die Presse and ORF, had to resign over leaked chats between them and politicians. The chats showed discussions over appointments with the public broadcaster ORF and friendly notes with “inappropriate closeness” between them and political leaders.

Outdated legal framework and harassment

Although various bills are being discussed, Austria is the last EU member state without a freedom of information law. Journalists are, moreover, concerned about certain political parties’ attempts to restrict their access to judicial information. 

Journalists are also harassed by various interest groups and societal movements. They are liable to censor themselves as a result of online attacks based on their gender, social class, ethnicity or religion. 

After the COVID-19 pandemic, the war between Russia and Ukraine has become an issue that is polarising Austrian society and encouraging people to question journalism, the report highlighted.

READ ALSO: ‘Reforms needed urgently’ – Is Austria becoming more corrupt?

Additionally, reporters’ coverage of protests is facing significant obstruction by police, who use frequent identity checks to harass them and threaten legal action. Women journalists are particularly at risk. Newsrooms often receive threatening letters and messages, according to the report.

SHOW COMMENTS