SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Swedish prime minister: ‘Sweden needs a new, more intrusive, social policy’

Sweden's prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, has called for a new, more aggressive social policy to prevent children being drawn into gang crime in deprived areas of Sweden's cities in his speech to the Almedalen political festival.

Swedish prime minister: 'Sweden needs a new, more intrusive, social policy'
Sweden's prime minister Ulf Kristersson makes his keynote speech at the Almedalen political festival. Photo: Anders Wiklund/TT

Kristersson called for tougher family planning policies to stop women in vulnerable areas from having too many children, for compulsory pre-schools, and for “an army of adults to set boundaries against anti-social behaviour”, likening the reforms required to those brought in to combat slum poverty in Sweden at the start of the 20th century. 

“We once battled poverty in Sweden with a unique combination of a rational view of knowledge, intrusive social reforms, family planning and an ideal of upstanding behaviour,” he said. “I believe Sweden needs to make this journey once again.” 

The prime minister’s speech has been the highpoint of the Almedalen political festival, ever since the Social Democrat leader Olof Palme began the tradition of holding an informal speech in the Almedalen park in Visby, the capital of Gotland, back in 1968. 

In his call for a tougher social policy, Kristersson drew on his own background as the city councillor responsible for social policy in Stockholm. 

He complained that Sweden’s system of child benefit acted as “an incentive to have more children”. 

“Instead we should encourage women facing social exclusion to enter the labour market. That would be a real feminist home policy!” he declared. “Today, Sweden is successfully funding family planning – in other countries. But we don’t want to talk about the same trap for women when it happens in Sweden.” 

Kristersson predicted that some people in society would resist a more intrusive social policy. 

“Some people aren’t going to like the fact that society quite literally knocks on their door. Some people are going to complain about being singled out, but we need to lay any anxiety to one side and intervene earlier and more decisively. What we’ve done so far quite simply does not work.” 

At the start of his speech, Kristersson held a minute’s silence in memory of Ing-Marie Wieselgren, the psychiatrist who was stabbed to death at the festival last year, saying that he had worked with her as a city councillor. 

“She exemplified in human form so much that is good about Sweden: always putting knowledge and science in the centre, always with empathy and sensitivity, and always being curious about solving the most difficult problems,” he said. 

He also ran through a list of what he saw as his government’s achievements since taking office in November last year, such as making Sweden’s migration policy as restrictive as possible under EU laws, reducing the reception of UN quota refugees by 80 percent, increasing the salary threshold for labour migration, and building more prisons. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS