SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

HEALTH

How does Switzerland’s healthcare system compare with the US?

In most aspects, Switzerland and the United States are vastly different countries. In terms of their healthcare systems, there are some similarities, but huge disparities as well.

How does Switzerland's healthcare system compare with the US?
Not everyone in the US has access to healthcare. Photo by SEBASTIEN BOZON / AFP

In some ways, Switzerland’s healthcare system is more similar to USA’s than to that of its European neighbours.

The main difference between the Swiss and European health systems is that the latter is public, while the former is private.

It is this private versus nationalised (or, as some say, socialised) aspect that brings Switzerland closer to the USA’s system than to Europe’s.

That is one similarity, but there is another as well.

For instance, both countries’ systems are very costly: at $12,318 per person (10,941 francs at a current exchange rate), the US spends more than any other country in the world on healthcare. Switzerland is in the third position, with $7,179 (6,377 francs) per capita.

So much for the similarities; now let’s look at the main differences.

Employer versus individual

Most US residents who are employed get their health insurance through their company.

In Switzerland, on the other hand, individuals are responsible for purchasing their own policies from one of the dozens of insurance providers.

It is difficult to say which approach is better; however, not having one’s health insurance tied to (and dependent on) a specific employer means that a person won’t be left without a coverage if he or she loses their job.

Mandatory versus optional

While in the United States health insurance is optional, in Switzerland the basic coverage (KVG in German and LaMal in French and Italian) is obligatory.

The consequence of this system (as mentioned above) is that if a US person becomes unemployed, losing the company health plan in the process, and chooses not to purchase their own coverage, he or she is not insured.

While they will be treated in emergencies, they will have to pay the cost of medical care out of their own pocket.

In Switzerland, such a situation won’t happen.

Did you say ‘costs’?

Both Switzerland and the US have a high standard of health care, in terms of facilities, technology, and general services.

However, the difference in prices for the same medical treatments is tremendous.

For instance, the average price for a knee replacement surgery in the USA is $35,000 (about 31,000 francs). 

The cost of the same procedure in Switzerland varies by cantons and hospitals, but the highest price is 16,900 francs. 

Insurance will pay most of this cost, but for people in the US who have no health coverage and are not very wealthy, paying this amount out of pocket often means going into debt.

In fact, statistics show that nearly a quarter of Americans have medical debt — which means they are not able to pay their health bills out of pocket.

Such a situation cannot happen in Switzerland.

Some Americans have no insurance and no money to pay exorbitant medical bills. Photo: Pixabay

Access to health services

This is another area with a wide gap between the two countries.

According to a Harvard University publication, “the current US healthcare system has a cruel tendency to delay or deny high-quality care to those who are most in need of it but can least afford its high cost. This contributes to avoidable healthcare disparities.” 

Also, the same publication points out that many health insurance companies in the US “restrict expensive medications, tests, and other services by declining coverage until forms are filled out to justify the service to the insurer.”

This practice discourages care deemed appropriate by a physician, it added.

In Switzerland, on the other hand, such a scenario is unrealistic.

Even the National Institutes of Health, an official US government body, noted in a report that the Swiss system “offers a high degree of choice and direct access to all levels of care with virtually no waiting times.” 

And speaking of waiting time

According to a survey by the Organisation  for Economic Cooperation and Development  (OECD) on how long patients in various countries typically wait for an appointment, Switzerland has among the shortest waits for medical tests and procedures, as well as for specialist visits.

The survey indicates that it is rare for residents of Switzerland to have to wait many weeks to be seen by a doctor or to schedule a surgery, except in exceptional cases.

“The share of people reporting that they sometimes, rarely or never get an answer from their regular doctor’s office on the same day is low in Switzerland (12 percent) but high in the United States (28 percent),” OECD reported.

Referrals

In the United States, a written referral from a physician is required for a patient to see a specialist.

If a patient sees a specialist without a proper referral, insurance company may refuse to pay the bill.

In Switzerland,  you can consult specialists without a referral from your doctor — unless your insurance policy states otherwise.

In principle, KVG / LaMal covers “unreferred” specialist visits, provided the doctor is officially recognised and not an unlicensed, back-alley practitioner.

However, there are exceptions to this rule.

If you don’t have a ‘regular’ plan  but a cheaper, more restrictive policy (such as HMO, Telmed, or family doctor model), you are limited in your unreferred specialist visits.

READ ALSO: How to see a specialist doctor in Switzerland without a referral

Other differences

While the Swiss have the world’s highest life expectancy — due in large measure to its efficient and accessible healthcare system — “Americans are living shorter, less healthy lives because our health system is not working as well as it could be,” according to a report from The Commonwealth Fund, an organisation that researches global healthcare issues. 

As this OECD chart indicates, life expectancy in the US is even below China’s.

The Commonwealth Fund pointed out that the US health system “can seem designed to discourage people from using services… Affordability remains the top reason why some Americans do not sign up for health coverage, while high out-of-pocket costs lead nearly half of working-age adults to skip or delay getting needed care.”
 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

PROTESTS

How free are people to protest in Switzerland?

As a centre of international diplomacy and cooperation and with its unique system of direct democracy, Switzerland enjoys a reputation for upholding fundamental human rights—but how free are the Swiss to express their opposition to power?

How free are people to protest in Switzerland?

In its recently released 2024 report, Amnesty International criticised Switzerland for imposing restrictions on the right to protest and for dispersing protests violently. 

So what’s the problem? 

While not an explicit ban on protest, Amnesty International considers the obligation in some Swiss cantons for protest organisers to gain official approval and shoulder potential costs to be a repressive measure—essentially a ‘workaround’ in cooling dissent.

Amnesty International’s criticism comes on the heels of other concerns.   

In 2024, Amnesty International joined with the United Nations in criticizing moves by some Swiss cantons and cities to ban protests regarding the Middle East conflict as ‘disproportionate’. 

Read More: How ordinary citizens can try to change the law in Switzerland

The organization has also highlighted the continued use of rubber bullets by Swiss police in dispersing protests as a serious area of concern. 

Furthermore, any changes to protests are controlled or permitted in Switzerland must be made through individual cantons due to the country’s devolution of specific powers – a process that could take years. 

So what restrictions have been introduced in Switzerland?

In early March, the ‘Anti-Chaoten’ initiative put forward by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) youth wing, which would have placed significant legal and financial burdens on protesters, was rejected in a Zurich cantonal referendum. However, a counterproposal by cantonal authorities was accepted at the polls.

The successful counterproposal requires explicit permission from authorities to hold a protest or rally, as well as passing on the cost of the police operation, as well as any intentional damage, to protest organizers. Failure to gain approval for protests can result in charges being laid. 

Following the success of the Zurich measure, the Basel SVP intends to introduce a similar proposal to be voted on in August – with the same likely result.

Which protests have been dispersed violently in Switzerland? 

Due to global events, protests have become increasingly common in Switzerland over the last five years. Most have been peaceful, but there have been exceptions.

Measures introduced to limit the spread of the coronavirus between 2020 and 2022 led to violent protests being dispersed in BernZurich and Lucerne

Read More: Switzerland to impose tougher penalties for violent protesters

Climate change protests have also been violently dispersed by police, using pepper spray and rubber bullets – such as in Basel in February 2023.

Amnesty International has also raised serious concerns regarding the police dispersal of an International Women’s Day protest in Basel on March 17th of this year, in which rubber bullets were also used. 

Most recently, opponents of the Eritrean regime were dispersed with tear gas and water cannons at a demonstration in Gerlafingen, Aargau, on March 31st. 

What right do the Swiss have to protest? 

The right to peaceful protest is enshrined in the Swiss federal constitution—Article 16 provides for freedom of expression, while Article 23 protects the right to free association. 

Indeed, in 2020, the country successfully introduced a resolution to the United Nations Human Rights Council, calling for world governments to protect the right to protest and not use the coronavirus pandemic as a reason to curtail freedoms. 

Read More: What foreigners should know about the Swiss constitution

Furthermore, the country is a signatory to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, as well as the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture, which could have some bearing on how protests are dispersed.  

SHOW COMMENTS