SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

UNDERSTANDING SWITZERLAND

‘It’s just their way’: Why don’t the Swiss like to queue?

For an orderly country, Switzerland is full of people who have seemingly never mastered the art of patiently waiting in line. Geneva-based Helena Bachmann considers why and how to deal with this behaviour.

'It's just their way': Why don't the Swiss like to queue?
If they are waiting patiently in lime, they are not Swiss. Photo: Pixabay

An international resident in Switzerland recently witnessed a scene at a train station, involving a group of Italian tourists jumping the queue to get on the train before all the other passengers, even though the group had arrived last.

Witnessing this moment, other commuters expressed their discontent, saying that this type of impolite behaviour is “typically Italian…they have no manners”.

Beyond the well-known propensity of some Swiss people to routinely blame foreigners for everything that is out of whack in their country, there is a clear irony here: the Swiss themselves are notorious queue jumpers.

‘It’s just their way’

But the irony doesn’t stop here.

In all other spheres of life, the Swiss are meticulously organised and like to micromanage everything that surrounds them, with every patch of greenery cut and trimmed, and every cow counted and named.

But their penchant for law and order doesn’t carry over to situations where waiting in lines is necessary.

For instance, if you have ever waited to get on a ski lift at a resort, you probably saw how the usually orderly people morph into unruly masses.

Such a situation caught public attention in 2020, when skiers in the Belalp-Bahnen region of Valais jostled to get to the front of the queue rather than wait patiently in line.

Even the former US ambassador to Switzerland, Suzi LeVine, complained in 2015 about the “inefficiency” and “chaos” at Swiss ski lifts. 

READ ALSO : US diplomat sparks flap over Swiss ski ‘chaos’

Lots of people stand at the station in Grindelwald, Switzerland, in January 2023.

Lots of people stand at the station in Grindelwald, Switzerland, in January 2023 But will any of them queue? Photo by Luke Tanis on Unsplash

The reasons for this kind of non-compliance with the ‘first come, first served’ principle are often debated on social media and on various online forums.

“Why oh why can’t the Swiss learn the polite art of queuing?, one user of The Local’s forum asked. “We use the ferries on a very regular basis, we get in line but a ton of folk just pile up in front of us? And they are so blatant with it too.”

Others have suggested what could be a plausible explanation for this common (mis)behaviour: one person said that the problem could be that the Swiss, who are accustomed to a certain order of things, “are awful at handling ‘unusual’ situations” like chaos.

“They aren’t being rude on purpose; it’s just their way.”

How do you deal with this behaviour?

There have been no concrete suggestions for how to deal with this habit other than appeals for common courtesy.

It appears that the Swiss themselves see nothing wrong with the mayhem at public transport stations or other situations that surely would benefit from people standing in line in an orderly fashion. 

In terms of crowds at ski lifts, certain resorts, and tourists alike, have been calling for ski lift operators to adapt a system common on the ski slopes in the United States and Canada, which consists of forming two lines, which then merge into each other.

READ ALSO: Will an American-style queuing system end chaos at Swiss ski lifts?

Currently in Switzerland there is only one queue for the ski lifts, often resulting in pushing or bumping against other skiers.

Waiting in a funnel-shaped line in front of the turnstile, as is common on Swiss slopes, is “a chaotic queuing system,” one resort manager said.

Other options for dealing with this behaviour include being passive aggressive – like rolling your eyes at violators.

Meanwhile, some people become equally aggressive, elbowing their way up front to give these line breakers a taste of their own behaviour – although that would result in more aggro, which could mean the whole experience gets even more stressful so we wouldn’t recommend that.

But some businesses in Switzerland have already taken proactive measures to rein in this kind of practice.

Many banks, post offices, and some shops now have a system in place where each entering customer gets a ticket with a number from a machine and everyone must wait patiently until their turn comes up. 

It’s certainly one way to get the normally order-loving Swiss into line.

What’s your experience of queueing in Switzerland? Let us know by leaving a comment or emailing [email protected]

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

PENSIONS

OPINION: Switzerland faces two pension votes but neither offers a solution

Switzerland's two public votes on Sunday March 3rd offer Swiss voters two different versions of reality – the elderly as vulnerable versus the elderly as strong. Clare O’Dea asks whether pensioners need protection or a push.

OPINION: Switzerland faces two pension votes but neither offers a solution

The first popular initiative, launched by trade unions, is called ‘To live better in retirement’. This noble aspiration comes with an annual price tag of four billion francs. The proposal is to increase the annual state pension by 8.33 percent by making a thirteenth annual payment.

The second initiative emanates from a completely different world view, championed by the youth section of the Radical-Liberal Party. It aims to increase the retirement age from 65 to 66 by 2033, and then to tie it to life expectancy. This idea comes with an annual saving of two billion francs.

Voters will get to decide if older people should receive more or give more, or whether to leave the status quo. Both ideas suffer from being rather blunt instruments but they will serve as an interesting test of public opinion.

Free money

The Swiss are traditionally cautious about voting for ‘free stuff’, even when it might benefit them directly. Statutory paid maternity leave was turned down four times before finally being accepted in 2005. Voters said no to two weeks more annual leave in 2012 and rejected a minimum wage in 2014.

The 2.5 million people – every Swiss resident over the age of 65 – who currently receive the state pension, known as the Old Age and Survivors’ Insurance, can’t be counted on to vote to receive a higher pension. Why? Because most of them don’t need it.

In addition to this basic first-pillar payment (up to a maximum of CHF32,000 annually for a single person), pensioners may have income from their occupational pension, private pension, or both. These are known as the second and third pillar of the pension system.

Retirees whose combined pension payments are not enough to meet their living costs are entitled to complementary social assistance payments. In 2021, that was 12.5 per cent of pensioners.

READ ALSO: The reasons why living in Switzerland can prolong your life

Expensive times?

Inflation in Switzerland is relatively low – 2.1 percent in 2023 was considered a bad year. But it’s also not a great measure of the cost of living, particularly as it does not include health insurance premiums, which are up 8.7 percent in 2024 alone.

There is no doubt that some older people struggle to make ends meet – and they would de delighted to have an extra 1,225 to 2,450 francs per year (current range of the monthly payment) to get by. But is that a reason to give everyone over 65 extra money – including the wealthy?

The fundamental flaw with this proposed reform is that it is not means tested. Making a universal payment is an extremely expensive way to help people who are genuinely facing poverty. It is estimated that one in five pensioners live below or close to the poverty line – counting income, not assets.

It seems clear that the energy put into this initiative would have been better spent designing a measure that would target those who actually need the money. But if you do want to help the needy, right here, right now, this initiative would at least be a quick fix.

Losing support

The proposal to increase retirement age has also been rejected by the government, which is not comfortable with the concept of building in the automatic link to life expectancy – in other words, basing policy on a mathematical formula.

But the initiative campaign says raising the retirement age is the best way to save the state pension while being fair to all generations. The pension pot is mainly funded by today’s workers, in the expectation that they will have the same benefit one day.

Sunday’s votes are people’s initiatives, based on the collection of signatures. To pass, they need not just a simple majority but a majority of cantons to say yes. Neither appear to be in a strong position.

The retirement age proposal looks sure to be defeated, especially as voters just accepted an increase in women’s retirement age from 63 to 65 in 2022, which is still being rolled out. The notion that the rich could still afford to retire while ordinary workers will be chained to their jobs for longer rankles with voters.

After a strong start, support for the thirteenth pension payment has been ebbing away and a ‘yes’ vote now looks in doubt. The results will be closely watched on Sunday.

More complex answers

Most people realise that the retirement age will have to be hiked up sooner or later, but to actually persuade the Swiss to vote for this scenario, there would need to be plenty of extra measures to guarantee fairness and flexibility.

What a lot of the debate around ageing and retirement funding seems to miss is that the elderly are a mixed bunch in terms of privilege. Policies that don’t take into account that complexity are not much help.

Yes, most Swiss people of retirement age are in reasonably good health and in a good financial situation. At 83 years, Swiss life expectancy is among the highest in the world. Depending on the job, the economy could probably squeeze an extra year of work out of them.

However, this segment of the population, born around 1959, cannot be lumped together as one homogenous group. Women and immigrants tend to accumulate smaller pensions. Single people are generally worse off than couples. 

Some have a life of disadvantage and hard jobs behind them; others benefitted from a world-class, heavily subsidised education and have built up huge assets. Some are fit as fiddles, leaping from one mountain peak to the next, and some already suffer from multiple geriatric health problems.

Answers to their needs will have to be written on more than the back of a postcard.

SHOW COMMENTS