SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

STRIKES

Does the deal to end Norway’s private sector strike benefit you?

The general strike in Norway's private sector, which started on Monday, ended on Thursday afternoon. Could the deal to raise workers' wages benefit you?

LO logo
On Thursday afternoon, an agreement was reached between the employer and employee representatives in the 2023 wage settlement negotiations. Photo by: Hanna Alice Johnsen / LO / Press

After four days of an unprecedented strike, given it took place during Norway’s interim wage settlement negotiations – the employer and employee representatives were able to reach an agreement on Thursday afternoon.

This year’s wage settlement negotiations were interim settlement talks, where only the salary was negotiated.

The employee side was represented by the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) and the Confederation of Vocational Unions (YS), while the employer side’s interests were looked after by the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO).

So, will this deal benefit you? If you’re a member of any of the two big union families in the private sector (LO or YS), the short answer is – yes.

The deal

In Thursday’s agreement, the two sides agreed on a framework of 5.2 percent wage growth, with a larger proportion of the increase included in general supplements.

As the NHO explains on its webpage, a general supplement refers to a salary supplement for everyone within the collective agreement, either in the form of a percentage increase in wage rates or as a krone supplement.

So, generally speaking, what does this mean for LO and YS members in terms of wage growth in kroner?

All LO and YS members got 7.5 kroner an hour (i.e. 14,625 kroner per year), the low-paid got 11.5 or 10.5 kroner an hour, depending on whether they have local bargaining rights or not (the low wage supplement of 3 kroner per hour would mean 5,850 kroner a year for collective agreements with below 90 percent of the average industrial worker’s wage, while the low wage supplement for collective agreements without local bargaining rights, amounting to an additional 4 kroner per hour, would translate into 7,800 kroner a year).

Furthermore, an additional 1 kroner per hour was negotiated for the bus industry by YS.

As a reference point, an average industrial worker’s salary in Norway amounted to 544,700 kroner last year.

You can find more information on the details of the deal on the web pages of LO and YS.

Who is affected?

The settlement covers the broad union families of LO and YS. LO has gone out and said that around 185,000 union members in LO/NHO companies would be affected.

On the employer side, 33,000 companies were represented by the NHO.

Among others, unionised workers in the following segments of the private sector will be affected: industry, food and drink production, retail stores, hotels and restaurants, ski resorts, transport, veterinarians, bakers, printing, and others.

Workers with low-wage supplements got the most out of the wage settlement, according to the Fafo Research Foundation researcher Kristine Nergaard.

In the agreement between LO and NHO, the low wage supplement was increased by 3 kroner an hour. For those without local bargaining rights, it was increased by 4 kroner an hour.

“With the new low-wage supplement and the general supplement, those who receive the low-wage supplement, in industries where the average wage is low, came out on top,” Nergaard told the newspaper E24.

The other group singled out as profiting from the talks are those who would have needed help gaining traction in local negotiations.

“This is a settlement that aims to improve purchasing power. If you look at the sums, there have never been such high general supplements. It has been a long time since we have seen such high salary increases,” Nergaard said.

How Norway’s collective bargaining system work

The annual wage settlement in Norway is a process that determines new wage levels for the majority of employees, given that well over 50 percent of the workforce is covered by a collective agreement (more than two million people in the country are part of a union).

During the negotiation process, the parties usually discuss various issues, such as wage increases, benefits, and working conditions in Norway.

READ MORE: What is a Norwegian collective bargaining agreement?

However, the 2023 talks are an interim settlement (mellomoppgjør), meaning that the key aspect of the negotiations will be the wage. Every other year, the main settlement (hovedoppgjøret) takes place, in which the entire collective agreement is negotiated.

The negotiations, also known as collective bargaining or wage settlement, are meant to ensure that employees receive their fair share of the profits generated by their employer and that their pay is adjusted to account for the increasing prices of goods and services.

While non-union employees don’t have the same bargaining rights as their unionised counterparts, some employers may still adjust their pay on an annual basis.

Additionally, some industries have a statutory minimum wage level that is typically updated annually after the collective settlement negotiations are concluded, making the collective negotiations even more important.

Prices in Norway are expected to rise by 4.9 percent this year. The demand in this year’s wage settlement talks has been for the employer side to offer a wage increase that surpasses inflation.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

Nordic countries urged to set common working from home rules

The Nordic countries should have common conditions on working from the place of residence, including working from home, to fulfil the objective of an integrated labour market, says a report by the region's Freedom of Movement Council.

Nordic countries urged to set common working from home rules

The proposal is part of a series of recommendations to simplify tax agreements to facilitate free movement of people and make the region “the most integrated” in the world by 2030, as agreed by Nordic Prime Ministers.

The Freedom of Movement Council argues that the pandemic revealed the flaws in the current system, as a large proportion of cross-border workers had to operate from home, facing taxation in two countries, different tax levels and mounting bureaucracy.

“Now that more companies are open to their employees working from home, the current Nordic tax agreement just isn’t keeping up. I hope this analysis will pave the way for dialogue and that the end result will be simplification and less bureaucracy,” said Karen Ellemann, secretary-general of the Nordic Council of Ministers.

Internationally less known than EU free movement rules, the region has a special agreement on free movement of people that dates back to the 1950s.

Under the Nordic Passport Union, citizens can move within the region without travel documents or residence permits and enjoy more rights than those granted to EU citizens within the European Union. Non-EU residents, however, only partially benefit as they do not have the automatic right to work in another Nordic state.

The Nordic free movement area covers Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Faroe Islands and Åland. Greenland is not part of the Passport Union but is in practice subject to some of its provisions.

The Nordic governments set up the Freedom of Movement Council as an independent body to identify obstacles to this principle and propose how to remove them.

In an interview with The Local, chair Siv Friðleifsdóttir said the Council has identified over 100 barriers to free movement and prioritised 30. The tax system is one of them.

“The Nordic countries currently have several agreements that regulate cross-border and remote working. Common to all of them is that they’re based on the countries’ need to protect their tax base,” the Council notes.

INTERVIEW:

The report, prepared by consultancies KPMG and Resonans Nordic, points at four problems in particular: rules for domestic work, registration obligations in more than one country for employers, as well as taxation of wages and pensions when working in another Nordic state.

The Council therefore proposes to set common conditions on “permanent establishment” when working in the country of residence, including from home. It also suggests to tax salaries in the country of employment and consider work from home in the country of residence equal to work in the country where the employer is located.

In addition, advance tax should be reported and collected in the employer’s country to avoid having different rules for the same salary.

Pension contributions should be mutually recognised as deductible in another Nordic states and returns taxed only under the legislation of the country where the pension plan is established, the Council argues.

In the Øresund region, between Denmark and Sweden, a fully integrated labour market could generate combined annual socio-economic gains of 2.9 billion Danish kroner, the report estimates.

“Our countries have a lot to gain from having a flexible common labour market. It can solve the problem of skills shortages in one country and the problem of unemployment in another. In other words, a functioning labour market is a strong catalyst for our countries’ economies,” says Siv Friðleifsdóttir, chair of the Freedom of Movement Council.

The full report is currently only available in Danish but translations are expected in the coming weeks.

SHOW COMMENTS