SHARE
COPY LINK

GERMANY AND UK

Charles III lays wreath for WWII bombing victims in Hamburg

Britain's King Charles III on Friday commemorated German victims of World War II Allied air raids, a gesture carrying great significance for both countries.

King Charles in Hamburg
Britain's King Charles III pay his respects during a wreath-laying ceremony in Hamburg. Photo: Adrian Dennis / POOL / AFP)

On the third and final day of his first state visit since ascending the throne, the monarch, accompanied by German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, visited the St Nikolai memorial in Hamburg, where he laid a wreath.

The move, in the ruins of a church, is unprecedented for a British sovereign. TV commentators on rolling news channel NTV calling it a “great, great symbol”.

When Charles’s late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, visited Dresden in 1992, eggs were flung at her after she failed to get out of her car to lay a wreath at the rubble of the Frauenkirche — a symbol of wartime destruction.

After laying the wreath alongside Steinmeier and Hamburg mayor Peter Tschentscher, Charles stood for a moment with his head bowed.

Then Queen Consort Camilla placed a white rose at the memorial.

Ahead of the ceremony, Germany’s biggest-selling daily Bild said Charles’ gesture at the memorial “will say more than any speech”.

The issue of German suffering in World War II is historically and politically explosive.

Wracked with guilt over the extermination by the Nazis of six million Jews, mainstream Germany tends to shy away from discussing suffering by Germans during the war.

The WWII air raids, which were among the most controversial actions taken by the Allies, were designed to terrorise the German population and force a surrender. They killed tens of thousands of civilians.

The far-right often cites the memory of the bombings to measure German suffering against Nazi guilt.

READ ALSO: Charles warns Europe’s security under threat in landmark speech in German

‘It matters’

Hamburg’s bishop Kirsten Fehrs, who said the Coventry Litany of Reconciliation at Friday’s ceremony, stressed the importance of the event.

“The sign of reconciliation between two war enemies and the joint commemoration of the victims are an important signal today,” she said, according to remarks carried by regional broadcaster NDR.

Engineer Rainald Erbacher, 54, who was at the memorial said Charles’ action “sends a positive signal”.

He underlined that it was a “difficult balance to strike between the past and looking ahead” but that the king’s gesture was appropriate.

In a commentary for the Guardian, Hamburg-based historian Helene von Bismarck said Charles’s stop at the memorial was more than just another photo op.

King Charles III in Hamburg

Britain’s King Charles III pays his respects during a wreath-laying ceremony in Hamburg. Photo: Adrian Dennis / POOL / AFP)

“At a time when many politicians all over the world like to pick and choose from history with the sole aim of suiting their narratives, it matters,” she said.

Hamburg and Dresden were among the most heavily bombed cities in Nazi Germany.

On July 24th, 1943, Britain and the United States began raiding Hamburg in what was described as a “Blitz week”, with the Royal Air Force striking by night and the US forces bombing by day.

Codenamed Operation Gomorrah, it unleashed some 9,000 tonnes of explosives, killing more than 30,000 people and leaving the port city in rubble.

During the raids, the St Nikolai church tower was used as a landmark by bomber pilots.

Originally designed by English architect George Gilbert Scott, who restored London’s Westminster Abbey, St Nikolai has been left in its ruined state and now houses a WWII memorial and museum.

READ ALSO: Just how well does Britain’s King Charles III speak German?

Train ride to Hamburg

The themes of reconciliation and a future forged by common values have featured prominently during Charles’s three-day visit, widely interpreted as a bid to build bridges after Brexit.

Charles, who has blood ties to Germany, has visited the European giant more than 40 times.

But during his inaugural foreign trip as king, he managed to score several firsts, including becoming the only monarch to address the German parliament.

Crowds wait for King Charles in Hamburg

Crowds wait to greet Britain’s King Charles III outside Hamburg City Hall in Hamburg. Photo: Chris Jackson / POOL / AFP

In Berlin for the first two days of his visit, he also interacted with well-wishers at the Brandenburg Gate where he was given a formal welcome, as well as toured a reception centre for Ukrainian refugees.

He travelled on Friday morning to Hamburg on a regular scheduled train, to the delight of some passengers.

Medical student Henriette Czech, 20, voiced her surprise at finding herself on the same train.

“It’s exciting for a mere mortal that a royal is on the train,” she told AFP.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

RACISM

FACT CHECK: Are people punished for using Nazi slogans in Germany?

After a video clip of people chanting Nazi slogans on the German island of Sylt went viral, many are waiting to see what consequences the perpetrators will face. The Local takes a look at how German law handles cases of hate speech.

FACT CHECK: Are people punished for using Nazi slogans in Germany?

Last week, a video clip showing people chanting “foreigners out” and “Germany for Germans” to the tune of “L’Amour Toujours” by Gigi D’Agostino spread rapidly online, and sparked calls for consequences for those involved.

Since then a series of similar incidents have been reported at various events across Germany, including: men seen singing the racist lyrics at ‘Schlagermove’ in Hamburg, two men arrested at Erlangen’s ‘Bergkirchweih’ festival for the same action, and in Stuttgart supporters of the Turkish football club Galatasaray Istanbul erupted in bouts of the chant celebrating their team’s victory.

In all of these incidents police reports were made. 

Regarding the Sylt incident, public prosecutors have already opened investigations on the suspicion of incitement to hatred for several of the people involved.

READ ALSO: Outrage after partygoers filmed shouting racist chants on German island of Sylt

Many of them have reportedly lost their jobs over the incident, and public protests have popped up against far-right and racist behaviour. But it could be a while before prosecutors officially decide if charges should be brought in this case. 

For foreigners living in Germany, the incident brings an interesting question to mind: in which cases exactly is racist or xenophobic speech illegal in Germany?

The Local takes a look at the German laws around hate speech, and what actions are punishable by law.

What is considered hate speech according to German law?

In general, Germany places high importance on the freedom of speech. This is why all kinds of groups, regardless of where they stand on the political spectrum, can speak, rally and protest freely in this country.

However, given Germany’s history, when current laws were written, some rules were put in place that were meant to prevent people from targeting minorities with hateful speech. Additionally, glorifying the Holocaust, or denying the fact that it happened, is a punishable offence.

Specifically, incitement to hatred (Volksverhetzung) is illegal, according to section 130 of Germany’s penal code.

Here it is written that, “Whoever, in a manner that is likely to disturb the public peace, incites hatred against a national, racial, religious or ethnic group…”, can be imprisoned for up to five years.

Additionally, a person can face up to three years in prison for either creating or disseminating content that incites hatred along the same lines.

Further sub-sections of the law clarify that either approving of crimes committed by the Nazis, or denying or trivialising them, in a manner that disturbs the public peace can also be punished with jail time up to five years or a fine. The same goes for creating or sharing content that delivers a message along those lines.

One well-known case against a Holocaust denier was held in 2007 when Germar Rudolf was sentenced to two and half years in prison for publishing “research” meant to disprove the Nazi’s use of gas chambers in concentration camps, among other things.

How is the law applied in practice?

While Germany’s hate speech ban sounds like an obvious and simple rule in theory, things quickly get a bit more complicated when it comes to enforcing it.

Whereas it is quite easy to identify racism or xenophobia as soon as you see or hear it, whether it qualifies as criminal conduct, according to the law, can be tricky to determine.

“This is the case if a statement violates a specific prohibition under criminal law,” Sonja Eichwede, legal policy spokeswoman of the SPD parliamentary group, told The Local. “For example, anyone who uses slogans of anti-constitutional organisations, calls for or condones criminal acts or incites hatred against certain groups of people will be prosecuted.”

Such was the case in the recent trial of Björn Höcke, a far-right AfD politician in Thuringia, who was fined €13,000 for closing a political speech with the rallying cry, “Everything for Germany”, which is a slogan known to have been used by the Nazi party.

READ ALSO: Hitler or Höcke? Regional AfD boss cuts short German TV interview

German law books in front of prosecutor

The German Criminal Code (StGB) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) stand next to a federal prosecutor in the courtroom. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Oliver Berg

What consequences could those seen at Sylt face?

The slogan heard at the incident at Sylt – “Germany for Germans, foreigners out” – is a chant that was used by Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, and has also been used by the far-right National Democratic party.

So it is possible that the people who disturbed the peace by saying these phrases on camera could be charged, and face hefty fines or even a prison sentence. But whether or not the law has been broken will need to be determined by prosecutors.

According to Eichwede, whether or not charges can be brought is reviewed on a case by case basis: “When this limit is exceeded can only be determined according to the specific circumstances of each individual case.”

She added: “Racist motives are given special consideration by the courts when determining the sentence and lead to a higher penalty.”

Short of using language known specifically to have been used by the Nazi party, or a terrorist organisation, incitement to hatred becomes trickier to establish.

But use of any language which targets a minority group, or which assaults someone’s human dignity based on their belonging to a certain religious or racial group, can be charged.

Other laws that have been applied against hate speech

Beyond the basic protections established in Section 130, there are a few other German codes that have been used to prosecute Holocaust deniers and fascist propagandists.

Similar to slander or libel laws, Germany’s Chapter 14 prohibits malicious gossip against citizens or defamation against politicians. It also includes a ban on defiling the memory of the dead.

In 2007, Holocaust denier and publisher of neo-Nazi propaganda, Ernst Zündel, was convicted of violating the memory of the dead. This charge was included in a broader incitement to hatred case, and he was sentenced to five years in prison.

Crucially, these kinds of insult-law cases can only be brought with the consent of the victim or the victim’s family.

Sections 86 and 86a ban online or offline distribution of “flags, insignia, uniforms, slogans and forms of greeting” that are known to belong to political parties and organisations that are considered unconstitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court, including Nazis and neo-Nazis.

Finally, the most recent addition to Germany’s legal protections against hate speech came in 2017 in the form of the Network Enforcement Act.

According to this law, social media companies are responsible for deleting hate speech on their platforms in Germany, and face up to €50 million in fines if they don’t.

Following a series of far-right terror attacks carried out by perpetrators who had been radicalised on the internet, the act was tightened in 2020.

READ ALSO:

SHOW COMMENTS