SHARE
COPY LINK

FAMILY

Why Swedish mums are having children later in life

For Swedish mums, it is now more common to have a child after 45 years of age than as a teenager.

Why Swedish mums are having children later in life
Mother holds a newborn baby's hand. Photo: Christine Olsson/TT

In 2022, 410 children were born to mothers aged 19 or younger, according to number crunchers Statistics Sweden. Meanwhile, 537 children were born to mothers aged 45 or older – the first year in which older mothers outnumbered their teenaged counterparts.

This upward trend began with the introduction of birth control pills in the 1960s, which allowed women greater control over their fertility and family planning.

Access to abortion and Sweden’s shift from an agricultural society to an industrialised one also bolstered the upward demographic trend for maternal age. In 1968, nearly 9,000 babies were born to teen mums, a number that has shrunk significantly over the decades.

This trend is not limited to Sweden. Across the Nordics, parents are waiting longer to have children.

“The upper limit is not as ‘fixed’ anymore,” Gunnar Andersson, a professor of demography at Stockholm University, told Swedish news agency TT. “Previously, there was perhaps an occasional 49-year-old. But with the new treatment methods, children are born to mothers at ages where it was not biologically possible before.”

IVF treatments were introduced in Sweden in the late 1970s, with the first Nordic IVF baby born in 1982 in Gothenburg. Today, both childless couples and single women without children in Sweden can apply for up to three free rounds of IVF at public hospitals.

This publicly-funded treatment for single women and single transgender men who can still reproduce is only available to Swedish citizens or permanent residence holders, according to the Karolinska University Hospital.

And while there are health risks associated with pregnancy at higher ages, overall, it seems that having an older mum can pay off for the children, who tend to born into better socio-economic conditions.

Delaying starting a family allows parents to focus on their education and on establishing their careers and livelihoods, Andersson said.

But sometimes, life happens.

“It may be that you do not find a suitable partner until you are a little older, or have a new relationship,” Andersson said. “You don’t plan to wait to have children until you’re 45.”

But even if the choice to have a baby until later in life is not a deliberate choice, for the child, having an older mum can be a positive thing.

“Children born to slightly older mothers are often better prepared than children born to very young mothers,” Andersson says. “The mothers have better incomes, social resources with a larger network and greater personal maturity.”

Member comments

  1. Well if it’s just a personal choice, then very well respected. But if we have to wait till 45 to have a child for ‘better’ socioeconomic conditions then I think there’s a problem in our society and economy. We must address that.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

IMMIGRATION

Swedish government announces new plans to limit family reunification permits

The government has launched an inquiry to further tighten family reunification permits, which would make it harder for family members to join both residence permit holders and Swedish citizens in Sweden.

Swedish government announces new plans to limit family reunification permits

Rules for some immigrants on family reunification permits, often referred to as ‘sambo’ permits, were already tightened up last autumn, with those changes primarily affecting under-21s and bringing stricter maintenance requirements for refugees. 

A new inquiry has been launched in order to further tighten immigration rules for those wishing to join family members in Sweden, with Migration Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard telling a press conference that it will affect “all types of family reunification permit where the applicant is applying to join someone with a residence permit in Sweden.”

“This could, for example, be people with a residence permit due to a need for protection, work, or studies,” she added.

The inquiry will also look into tightening the rules for people applying to join Swedish citizens.

“For this group, however, the rules for family reunification must not be worse than those for so-called ‘third country’ citizens,” she said. “For example, there should not be a stricter maintenance requirement for Swedish citizens than for third country citizens.”

Third country citizens refers to non-Nordic, non-EU citizens.

In the government and the Sweden Democrats’ coalition document, the Tidö agreement, the parties pledged to limit the rules for family reunification permits to the lowest possible level under EU law.

“The government wants to significantly reduce the number of asylum seekers coming to Sweden, as well as the number of approved residence permits,” Sweden Democrat migration spokesperson Ludvig Aspling added. “This is one part of that.”

“The possibility of family reunification is a factor that can affect an individual’s choice of where to apply for asylum, and it is therefore important that it is the rules for family reunification for people who seek asylum in Sweden and who are granted residence permits are not more generous in Sweden than EU law, or the law of other international treaties which Sweden is party to, dictates.”

The inquiry will look into limiting which family members can join asylum seekers in Sweden – this currently varies depending on the type of permit the person in Sweden holds.

It will also assess whether the current maintenance requirement should be further tightened, or introduced for certain permits where it is not currently required, for example for people who are legally defined as long-term residents of another EU country (varaktigt bosatt in Swedish), who want to reunite with another family member in Sweden.

“This maintenance requirement is designed, most of all, to encourage integration,” Aspling said. “It has been assessed as being able to motivate the person in Sweden to find work, become self-sufficient and find their own home for themselves and their family.”

In addition to this, it will look into the possibility for introducing a requirement for applicants to take out full coverage health insurance in order to qualify for a permit. This is already in place for some immigrants, for example those on student permits, but not for family reunification permits.

It will also assess whether DNA analysis should be used “to a greater extent”, for example in order to prove that family members are actually related. The Migration Agency is currently allowed to offer applicants DNA analysis if they need to prove a familial bond.

“We don’t know to what extent this is used today, so we need to investigate that,” Malmer Stenergard said.

“This could, for example, be used to protect children from being forced to join someone who they are not, in fact, related to,” Aspling said.

The inquiry will also assess whether it should be made possible for applications for family reunification permits to be denied for people who have committed a crime against a family member and been deported from Sweden, who then apply to join the same family member in Sweden.

The results of the inquiry will be presented no later than August 25th 2025.

SHOW COMMENTS