SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

WORKING IN NORWAY

What you need to know if your job in Norway requires security clearance

Some jobs in Norway require a security or access clearance. What is the process and what problems might arise that could stop you getting through?

Classified
Photo by AbsolutVision on Unsplash

If you’re moving to Norway in order to get a job in a sector which often deals with classified information – think security or government – chances are that you’ll need to get a security clearance and pass the necessary vetting process.

In this article, we’ll cover what security and access clearances entail, how classified information in Norway is categorised, how the authorisation process works, and what circumstances could negatively affect your clearance prospects.

The four levels of classified information

According to the Norwegian Security Act (Sikkerhetsloven), information is classified if the country’s national security interests may be harmed if the information becomes known to unauthorised persons.

At the time of writing, per the Security Act, the following four levels of security classification are in force – listed from highest to lowest: (1) top-secret (if critical adverse consequences could result from an information leak), (2) serious (if a leak could lead to serious adverse consequences), (3) confidential (if adverse consequences could result from the information becoming available to unauthorised persons), and (4) restricted (if adverse consequences could result from a leak to some extent).

So, if you’re working in a job in Norway which requires you to have access to classified information, you will need to be authorised by the competent vetting authority.

The same applies if your job entails you having access to critical national objects and infrastructure.

Who needs to be authorised?

Security regulations in Norway state that persons who handle information with a “confidential” or higher classification must hold a valid security clearance.

This also applies to people with access to critical national objects and infrastructure.

A person may only be given a security clearance if there are no reasonable grounds for doubting their suitability in terms of security.

Clearance decisions are made by the competent Norwegian clearance authority.

Who is in charge of the vetting process, and what to expect

There are different vetting authorities for the military/security sector and the civil sector in Norway. 

However, during the vetting process for both sectors, you’ll have a duty to provide complete information on any circumstances which may be relevant in the assessment of whether you’re suitable for getting a security clearance.

If you fail to respond to inquiries by the clearance authority or refuse to share pertinent information, the competent authority may decide to close the case without granting you clearance.

Also, if you need to get a high-level security clearance or access to objects or infrastructure classified as highly critical, the vetting process may also extend to persons associated with you.

Expect the vetting entity to review the information in their possession, information from relevant registers, and information from sources such as public authorities, places of service, workplaces, and other references.

Which authority is in charge of the clearance process?

As Gudmund Gjølstad, the Director General of the Norwegian Civil Security Clearance Authority, told The Local, Norway has several security clearance authorities.

“For the majority of the cases, either the Norwegian Defence or the Norwegian Civil Security Clearance Authority (NCSSA) is the relevant authority.

“The NCSSA (SKM in Norwegian) is the civil authority. We have the responsibility for ministries, municipalities, state administrators, and state and private organisations subject to the National Security Act.

“The National Security Authority (NSM in Norwegian) is only responsible for clearances of own employees. They have an overall role of providing legal and professional support to the clearance authorities. They also have other roles in addition to personnel security,” Gjølstad explained.

Furthermore, he noted that public employees at all levels and other personnel who need access to objects or information with a need for protection per the Security Act have to apply for clearance.

“The variety in which profession they have varies greatly, and the individual organisation assesses the need for clearance in the individual position. People cannot apply themselves – it is done through the employer. When positions are advertised, any requirement for clearance will normally appear there.”

What does the vetting authority look for?

In assessing your security suitability, the vetting authorities focus on your reliability, loyalty, and judgment in connection with processing classified information and access to critical national objects and infrastructure.

If there is any doubt about whether a person is suitable for security clearance, the clearance authority shall conduct a security interview with the person in question.

The following aspects of your biography and career are likely to be given particular attention during the vetting process and the potential security interview:

Espionage and terrorism connections: Any involvement in espionage, planning or committing acts of terrorism, sabotage, assassinations or similar acts, as well as attempts to engage in such activities, will be an obvious red flag.

Crime: The same goes for criminal acts or preparations for or inciting criminal acts.

Vulnerability to blackmailing: Expect the authorities to focus on circumstances which may cause you or your associates to be subjected to threats against their life, health, freedom or honour, such that you may be coerced into acting contrary to Norway’s national security interests.

Falsifying or omitting important information: Don’t hide any relevant information during the vetting process. Any falsification of facts, incorrect information, or omission of factual circumstances which are relevant to your security clearance can have a negative effect on the final outcome.

Addiction and intoxication abuse: The authorities will likely check whether you have a history of alcohol abuse or consumption of other intoxicants.

Illnesses: Remember to disclose any illness that may temporarily or permanently reduce reliability, loyalty, or judgment on medical grounds.

History of information/security breaches: Previous instances of compromising critical national information or breaching security provisions are, of course, glaring red flags.

Withholding information: Your refusal or failure to provide personal data will attract attention, so make sure to provide the authorities with what is requested. Also, failure to notify the authorisation authority of personal circumstances relevant to security is likely to become an issue.

Refusal to take a secrecy pledge: Any refusal to make a pledge of secrecy, a statement confirming a desire not to be bound by a pledge of secrecy, or refusal or failure to participate in a security interview goes against the very purpose of having a security clearance.

Financial vulnerability: Expect the authorities to inspect your financial circumstances to see if you might be tempted to act contrary to Norway’s national security interests.

Affiliation: Do you have any connections with organisations which have an unlawful purpose and which may threaten Norway’s democratic social order or which regard violence and terrorism as acceptable instruments? If so, you’re not likely to get clearance (obviously). Ties with other countries are also grounds for scrutiny.

Along with this (non-exhaustive) list, the process can also involve clarifying any other circumstances which may give reason to fear that you may act contrary to Norway’s national security interests.

You can find more information about the vetting process and security clearances in general on the webpage of the Norwegian National Security Authority, here. Further information can be found on the website of the Norwegian Civil Security Clearance Authority.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORKING IN NORWAY

Why overqualified foreigners in Norway struggle to find work

Norway is one of the worst countries in Europe when it comes to overqualified foreign labour being stuck in jobs that don’t make the best use of their skills, a new analysis has found. 

Why overqualified foreigners in Norway struggle to find work

Norway is one of many European countries struggling with “brain waste”, which is where immigrants struggle to find suitable full-time work or are overqualified for their roles due to their education not being recognised. 

The findings are part of an investigation by Lighthouse Reports, the Financial Times, El País and Unbias The News that found that most European countries fail to provide good job opportunities to educated foreigners – potentially at the cost of their labour forces and economies. 

“While the results differ slightly between labour market outcomes, a consistent pattern emerges: immigrants lag behind natives everywhere, but brain waste is worst in Southern Europe, Norway, and Sweden,” the report read

Some of the metrics used to measure brain waste were the proportion of foreign residents who were overqualified for their role, underemployed (meaning they weren’t working as much as they could), or unemployed. 

In Norway, 27.6 percent of university-educated Norwegians were overqualified for their roles, according to the report. Meanwhile, just over half of the university-educated immigrant population were overqualified for their job. 

This figure made Norway one of the countries with the largest raw difference in the percentage of the native population being overqualified compared to the immigrant population. 

Furthermore, the number of immigrants who were underemployed, 3.9 percent, was more than double the rate of Norwegians in the same position. 

The investigation used figures from Eurostat between 2017 and 2022. 

Norway’s Directorate of Integration and Diversity has recently investigated the obstacles facing the country’s foreign population in the workplace. 

Its report found that immigrants faced barriers both when trying to progress their careers or simply trying to get their foot in the door. 

Immigrants working in Norway were also more likely to leave working life earlier or lose their jobs. 

READ ALSO: The biggest barriers foreigners in Norway face at work

Factors such as working in temp positions, physically taxing occupations, and industries exposed to economic turbulence contributed to this. 

However, a lack of Norwegian proficiency, a lack of relevant skills and poor health also played a part. 

Discrimination prevented immigrants from entering the workplace and affected those who were employed

“More and more people in the population have contact with immigrants in working life, and most experience that contact as mainly positive. At the same time, one in four immigrants has experienced discrimination in the workplace, and this discrimination can occur in different forms and in different working situations,” the report read.

The directorate also said that most companies didn’t have concrete measures to try and promote diversity.

One factor holding back immigrants in Norway was their Norwegian language skills, the report said. 

While Norwegian skills were moving in the right direction, less than half of foreigners in the country had advanced Norwegian language skills (level B2 according to the European framework) after completing language training.

Meanwhile, Lighthouse Reports’ investigation found that brain waste in Norway varied from profession to profession. For example, Norway was one of a number of countries where college-educated immigrants were more likely to be doctors. 

Immigrants with a university education in IT-related subjects were also far less likely to be overqualified. There, the difference between migrants being overqualified compared to natives was just 2 percent. 

However, physical and engineering science technicians, engineering professionals (excluding electrotechnology), and those who have studied education at a university level were the immigrant groups in Norway most likely to be overqualified. 

One thing to note is that immigrants who obtained their qualifications in Norway were far less likely to be overqualified than those who got their degrees outside of Norway, even if they still fared worse than natives overall. 

SHOW COMMENTS