SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

ZURICH

4,000 francs a month: Zurich set to introduce minimum wage

Switzerland’s largest — and most expensive — city is seeking to introduce a minimum hourly salary from 2024.

4,000 francs a month: Zurich set to introduce minimum wage
There is relief in sight for low-income employees in Zurich. Photo: Pixabay

In 2022, a committee composed of left-wing parties and trade unions submitted to the city council an initiative called “A wage to live,” which called for a minimum hourly wage of 23 francs per hour to be introduced in Zurich.

Municipal councillors countered with an even better proposal last week, upping the amount to an inflation-adjusted minimum wage of 23.90 per hour — 4,000 francs a month. 

This wage is intended mainly for an estimated 17,000 low-income Zurich residents, two-thirds of whom are women.

The minimum salary “will relieve many of those affected by low wages in the city of Zurich – employees at fast food chains, cleaning companies, and those working in retail”, said Oliver Heimgartner from the local Social Democratic Party.

However, there may still be hurdles to overcome before the proposed minimum wage becomes law in Zurich, as it cannot be excluded that right-wing groups, which oppose minimum wages, will launch a referendum on this issue.

“A minimum wage jeopardises jobs and harms the economy,” MP Susanne Brunner from the populist Swiss People’s Party (SVP) said.

In addition, she pointed out that a municipal minimum wage – that is, one that applies only to the city and not to the entire canton – is a “bureaucratic nightmare.”

If the initiative does go through in Zurich, the city will join five Swiss cantons where minimum wage is already a rule.

Geneva has what has been called the “world’s highest minimum wage” — 24 francs an hour, which was raised from 23 francs in 2020 and 23.27 francs in 2022, to adjust for inflation. 

The Swiss city of Zurich.

The Swiss city of Zurich. Photo by Ilia Bronskiy on Unsplash

Next is Basel-City, which has set its wage at 21 francs an hour, while Neuchâtel and Jura set at 20, and Ticino, at 19.75.

These salaries, negotiated by unions on behalf of workers, reflect the cost of living in each of these regions.

In all these cantons, as elsewhere in Switzerland, most people earn more than the minimum.

Unlike many other countries, Switzerland doesn’t have a nationally mandated minimum wage.

That does not, however, mean that companies are free to pay their workers as much — or as little — as they want.

Instead, the minimum amount is determined through negotiations between employers and unions  — the so-called  collective labour agreement (CLA).

Generally speaking, CLAs cover a minimum wage for each type of work; regulations relating to work hours; payment of wages in the event of illness or maternity; vacation and days off; and protection against dismissal. 

CLAs are sector-specific; in other words, they take into account the particular aspects of each branch. As an example, Switzerland’s largest labour union, The Swiss Federation of Trade Unions (UNIA), maintains 265 collective agreements in the areas of industry and construction.

READ MORE: What is a Swiss collective bargaining agreement — and how could it benefit you?

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORKING IN SWITZERLAND

The pitfalls of Switzerland’s social security system you need to avoid

In most cases, Switzerland’s social benefits system functions well. But there are also some loopholes you should know about.

The pitfalls of Switzerland's social security system you need to avoid

The Swiss social security system has several branches: old-age, survivors’ and disability insurance; health and accident insurance; unemployment benefits, and family allowances.

This is a pretty comprehensive package, which covers everyone who pays into the scheme for a wide variety of ‘what ifs’.

As the government explains it, “people living and working in Switzerland benefit from a tightly woven network of social insurance schemes designed to safeguard them against risks that would otherwise overwhelm them financially.” 

But while most residents of Switzerland are able to benefit, at least to some extent, from this system, others don’t.

What is happening?

If someone becomes ill or has an accident, Switzerland’s compulsory health insurance and / or accident insurance will cover the costs.

However, a prolonged absence from work can become costly.

That is especially the case of people employed by companies that don’t have a collective labour agreement (CLA), a contract negotiated between Switzerland’s trade unions and employers or employer organisations that covers a wide range of workers’ rights. 

READ ALSO: What is a Swiss collective bargaining agreement — and how could it benefit you?

It is estimated that roughly half of Switzerland’s workforce of about 5 million people are not covered by a CLA.

If you just happen to work for a company without a CLA, your employer is not required to pay your salary if your illness is long.

You will receive money for a minimum of three weeks – longer, depending on seniority — but certainly not for the long-haul.

You may think that once your wages stop, the disability insurance (DI) will kick in.

But that’s not the case.

The reason is that DI can be paid only after a year after the wages stop. In practice, however, it sometimes takes several years of investigations and verifications to make sure the person is actually eligible to collect these benefits, rather than just pretending to be sick

In the meantime, these people have to use their savings to live on.

What about ‘daily allowance insurance’?

Many companies (especially those covered by a CLA) take out this insurance, so they can pay wages to their sick employees for longer periods of time.

However, this insurance is optional for employers without a CLA is place.

As a result, small companies forego it because it is too much of a financial burden for them.

And people who are self-employed face a problem in this area as well: insurance carriers can (and often do) refuse to cover people they deem to be ‘too risky’ in terms of their age or health status.

Critics are calling the two situations —the length of time it takes for the disability insurance to kick in and gaps in the daily allowance insurance—”perhaps the biggest failures of the social security system.”

Is anything being done to remedy this situation?

Given numerous complaints about the unfairness of the current system, the Social Security and Public Health Commission of the Council of States (CSSS-E) will look into the “consequences of shortcomings and numerous dysfunctions in long-term illness insurance.”

But not everyone in Switzerland sees a problem in the current situation.

According to the Swiss Insurance Association (ASA), for instance, “making it compulsory to maintain wages beyond the legal minimum would not have the desired effect. Due to false incentives, this would only accentuate the upward trend in costs and premiums.”

SHOW COMMENTS