SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

MOVING TO NORWAY

Waiting times of 18 months: What foreigners think of Norway’s immigration process

To live and work in Norway legally, you will need to deal with the country's immigration authorities. The Local asked readers what they thought of Norwegian immigration services.

Pictured is a person at Pulpit Rock.
Here's what foreign residents in Norway thought of the country's immigration services. Pictured is a person at Pulpit Rock. Photo by Mario Klassen on Unsplash

There are a number of different options available when it comes to moving to Norway. The rules may be more or less strict depending on whether you are a national of the European Economic Area (EEA).

Those from within the EEA, and their family members, benefit from Freedom of Movement. At the same time, those from outside the EEA will need to obtain a residence permit to live legally and work in Norway.

Both non-EEA and EEA nationals will need to deal with the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI), though. In addition, Norwegian police deal with appointments to hand in documents relating to residency and citizenship applications.

And in cases where an application is rejected, the applicant may wish to appeal the decision via The Immigrations Appeal Board (UNE).

More than 65 percent of those who responded to our survey asking about the country’s immigration services said that their experiences were either “mostly negative” or “a mix of negative and positive”.

Meanwhile, just over a combined 20 percent said that their dealings with the authorities were “mostly positive” or “somewhat positive”.

The biggest complaint among those who had negative experiences with the country’s immigration authorities was of long-waiting times.

“Well, it takes them seven months or more to renew a straightforward permit. It took me three months to get an appointment, and it took them four more months to start processing and, finally, five days to approve (the permit). Worst part (is) I could not even travel home for Christmas. I mean, they can (at least) provide (a) temporary visa or passport till they process (the application). It’s crazy that it’s 2023, processing should be automated,” Lester from Dal wrote in response to our survey.

Some other applicants have been waiting anywhere between 18 months and up to two years to receive a decision on their application.

“I am the Norwegian reference person (in an application). My husband is Egyptian. (We have) waited 19 months so far, and the UDI cannot tell us when we will receive a reply. Both interviews were done, and more than enough documents were uploaded. They are destroying people’s lives and mental health,” Mariann, whose husband is applying as a non-EEA national, wrote.

The Local has previously reported on waiting times of up to 18 months and more on residence applications, and how some applications were pushed to the back of the queue following a change in how the UDI processes cases. The UDI informed The Local in late 2022 that the number of those facing long waiting times had decreased between April 2022 and September 2022

Although, a small minority did praise the authorities for the speed and efficiency at which they worked.

“I came to Norway with my children and husband. The process was very smooth- even for my husband, who’s not an EU citizen. Fast, simple and people were really nice,” Sonia, who lives in Oslo, responded.

Another issue those who have had a challenging time with Norwegian authorities had was that they felt that the communication and information provided could have been more helpful.

“Some conflicting advice from telephone calls to what is on the website. Also, (there are) conflicting messages within the website,” Darren, a non-EEA residence permit holder, told The Local’s survey when asked about his experience with the immigration authorities.

“Smooth and quick for the most part, surprisingly fast work from the police and Skatteetaten (The Norwegian Tax administration). But their info was messed up, not coordinated, so I had to put extra time and effort bringing all the paperwork to different places that didn’t have info about me,” Anton, a non-EEA national who said they had a somewhat positive experience of Norway’s immigration authority, wrote.

However, not everyone who responded to our survey found the information provided to be confusing or sometimes conflicting. Some who had a positive experience said that the information provided was clear.

“Application portal quite useful and self-explanatory. But waiting times are unreasonably long and as are the customer helplines,” one reader who didn’t leave a name responded.

Another wrote, “Clear instructions if you pay attention to detail”.

Luci, who had mostly positive experiences, said the clarity of information provided could depend on what you are applying for.

“Being a British citizen pre-Brexit, I found the system very straightforward for a temporary residency permit. It became a little more complicated when I applied for a permanent residency permit after Brexit. I found it (the information) wasn’t very clear on what I had to provide paperwork-wise. When I got an appointment with all my paperwork, it turned out I didn’t need any of it,” she wrote.

Member comments

  1. Not fit for purpose udi 18 months wait for any public service I e residence permit a national disgrace probably working from home and where is proper journalism from the local asking difficult questions and bring people to account in public service I wonder eating lunch with the head of the udi while the public and families lives are devastated report this I think not

    1. Hello, we continue to report on the problems at UDI, such as long waiting times, and encourage readers to get in touch to highlight issues

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

Norway’s immigration authority closes 1,000 cases into suspected cheating

Norway’s Directorate of Immigration (UDI) has dismissed more than 1,000 cases where applicants were suspected of providing false information, its director confirmed to public broadcaster NRK.

Norway's immigration authority closes 1,000 cases into suspected cheating

The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI) has dismissed more than 1,000 asylum and immigration cases after it had been told to reduce the queue of cases by the Ministry of Justice, public broadcaster NRK reports.

Frode Forfang, director of UDI, told NRK that the UDI chose to close cases where there were suspicions that false information had been provided to prioritise what it considered to be the most pressing and serious cases .

“We were in a situation where a large number of cases were created, but our capacity was not proportionate to the number of cases. This meant that we did not get a good enough grip on the matters that we believe are the most serious. At the same time, it led to a good number of these cases becoming very old,” he said.

“Many people lived in uncertainty for a long time because we did not have the capacity,” he added.

The UDI also decided last year that cases older than three years old would not be reopened, according to the report from NRK.

Figures from the UDI provided to the broadcaster show that 78 people have been deported from Norway due to false information submitted with their asylum cases over the past six years.

In recent years, the rules for deporting those who have provided false information in asylum applications have been softened.

Over the last six years, nearly 900 people in Norway have received a new residence permit after their original one was withdrawn after the UDI had uncovered falsehoods in the original applications.

Forfang said it was important for the UDI to focus on cases where the applicant would likely be deported.

“We think that it is more important to work on those cases where we believe that the person in question may end up having to leave Norway, rather than those cases where the person in question will anyway be allowed to stay in Norway through a new permit,” Forfang said.

The UDI has previously told The Local that it had its budget cut. The directorate warned that this could mean longer waiting times for residence, asylum and citizenship in Norway.

“These budget cuts will reduce the UDI’s ability to process cases and respond to inquiries efficiently. A decrease in capacity to process cases may lead to extended waiting times for residency and citizenship applications, although this will also depend on the volume of cases received,” Beate Sveen, the UDI’s Director of Finance, told The Local last month.

SHOW COMMENTS