SHARE
COPY LINK

RESIDENCY PERMITS

‘Swedish migration does not care that my son has never been to Iran’

When Mehdi Saleh finally got his permanent residency decision after a year's wait this July, it came as a shock. He got a positive decision, but his son Ali was ordered to be deported to Iran, a country where he has never been.

'Swedish migration does not care that my son has never been to Iran'
IT manager Mehdi Salah with his son Ali on graduation day earlier this year. Photo: private

“I told them ‘he has no place to go’,” Saleh told The Local. “He was born in Kuwait, he has never been to Iran, and if he goes to Iran, he will be arrested for forced military service.”

Saleh is one of the hundreds of foreigners working in Sweden who are discovering that a new immigration law brought in in July 2021 is leading to a new phenomenon of “teen deportations”, where children of work permit holders who turn 18 before the Migration Agency makes a decision on their parents’ cases find themselves suddenly required to be able to support themselves. 

READ ALSO: What does Sweden’s new migration law mean for residence permit holders? 

The new law, called the Aliens Act, includes a maintenance requirement that applies to everyone over the age of 18, including dependents of work permit holders and recent PhD graduates.

“The changes meant, among other things, that the new requirements were imposed for everyone who applies for a permanent residence permit, which meant new rules for both main applicants as well as their family members,” explains Andreas Bråthe, partner at Ernst and Young’s People Advisory Services division. 

This, he said, was affecting “family members traveling with their partners, spouses or parents”, who “rely on the main applicant taking the financial responsibility due to their employment”.

To get permanent residence, they now need to show that they are able to support themselves and earn enough to cover their housing needs, plus a so-called “normal payment”, which is set this year at 5,157 kronor a month. 

“There are many cases where the family members are put in a situation where they need to find employment, sometimes with limited resources,” he said. ” Even if the financial need is not required for their private household, this is a must in order to fullfil the requirement for permanent residency.” 

Saleh said he had been “shocked” when he received the answer from the Migration Agency last July. 

“To be honest, the whole family is depressed now. The government doesn’t pay even a single penny to this boy. He is under my expense coverage, not the government of Sweden’s.” 

But living off money or in housing provided by your parents is not considered a valid form of support under the law. 

“There is not an option for the main applicant to go in and “cover” for the income that the dependent needs in order to meet the requirement,” Bråthe says. “Instead the assessment is made for each applicant separately, regardless of whether they share household and costs together with their family members.” 

The new law does give the agency leeway to make exceptions for those who “for other special reasons cannot support themselves”, but does not seem to be applying this in cases like Saleh’s son’s. 

Many foreign workers who came to Sweden with children between 14 and 17 years old, who were then given residency rights as co-applicants, are finding that their children are given deportation orders once they turn 18 and apply for residency as adults. 

Saleh’s son was not working or studying at university at the time of the application because he needed to retake some high school courses.

According to Saleh, his family is far from the only one affected. 

“When I talked to my son’s school, the headmaster said to me, ‘Mehdi, you are not the only parents who are suffering, unfortunately’. This has become a general issue for young people in Sweden. The new law is really disturbing families.” 

Ali, he said, has been put under significant stress by the deportation order and is “very worried”. 

Since the deportation order, he has now got a job as an administrator earning a high enough wage to meet the income requirements and has appealed the decision on this basis. 

But Saleh says it now remains to be seen if the Migration Court will rule that this is sufficient or whether it is too late to avoid deportation. 

Are you or a family member facing a similar situation to Mehdi Saleh and his son? Please get in touch, as we want to highlight the issue of teenage deportations and bring it to the attention of politicians and campaigners in Sweden. Email us at [email protected]  

Member comments

  1. Hi everyone –

    Great news for our friend Mehdi and his son.
    Canada, a great and moden nation – has the some of the highest immigration rates in the world.
    And this week – Canada announced it will increase immigration higher still.
    So don’t despair. But do read the following article and make new plans:

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-immigration-500000-2025-1.6636661

    And our friend Richard Orange should publish this comment if he cares at all about the immigrant community in Sweden as this is good and valuable information. As Canada is one of the worlds best nations, with an advanced economy, strong social structures, state medical care, and a booming economy including both high-tech and low tech jobs across many sectors including natural resources, energy, construction, finance, telecommunications, IT, software, healthcare, tourism, etc. And it has a culture of welcoming immigrants.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORK PERMITS

Business leaders: Work permit threshold ‘has no place in Swedish labour model’

Sweden's main business group has attacked a proposal to exempt some jobs from a new minimum salary for work permits, saying it is "unacceptable" political interference in the labour model and risks seriously affecting national competitiveness.

Business leaders: Work permit threshold 'has no place in Swedish labour model'

The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise said in its response to the government’s consultation, submitted on Thursday afternoon, that it not only opposed the proposal to raise the minimum salary for a work permit to Sweden’s median salary (currently 34,200 kronor a month), but also opposed plans to exempt some professions from the higher threshold. 

“To place barriers in the way of talent recruitment by bringing in a highly political salary threshold in combination with labour market testing is going to worsen the conditions for Swedish enterprise in both the short and the long term, and risks leading to increased fraud and abuse,” the employer’s group said.   

The group, which represents businesses across most of Sweden’s industries, has been critical of the plans to further raise the salary threshold for work permits from the start, with the organisation’s deputy director general, Karin Johansson, telling The Local this week that more than half of those affected by the higher threshold would be skilled graduate recruits Swedish businesses sorely need.   

But the fact that it has not only rejected the higher salary threshold, but also the proposed system of exemptions, will nonetheless come as a blow to Sweden’s government, and particular the Moderate Party led by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, which has long claimed to be the party of business. 

The confederation complained that the model proposed in the conclusions of the government inquiry published in February would give the government and political parties a powerful new role in setting salary conditions, undermining the country’s treasured system of collective bargaining. 

The proposal for the higher salary threshold, was, the confederation argued, “wrong in principle” and did “not belong in the Swedish labour market”. 

“That the state should decide on the minimum salary for certain foreign employees is an unacceptable interference in the Swedish collective bargaining model, where the parties [unions and employers] weigh up various needs and interested in negotiations,” it wrote. 

In addition, the confederation argued that the proposed system where the Sweden Public Employment Service and the Migration Agency draw up a list of exempted jobs, which would then be vetted by the government, signified the return of the old system of labour market testing which was abolished in 2008.

“The government agency-based labour market testing was scrapped because of it ineffectiveness, and because it was unreasonable that government agencies were given influence over company recruitment,” the confederation wrote. 

“The system meant long handling times, arbitrariness, uncertainty for employers and employees, as well as an indirect union veto,” it added. “Nothing suggests it will work better this time.” 

For a start, it said, the Public Employment Service’s list of professions was inexact and outdated, with only 179 professions listed, compared to 430 monitored by Statistics Sweden. This was particularly the case for new skilled roles within industries like battery manufacturing. 

“New professions or smaller professions are not caught up by the classification system, which among other things is going to make it harder to recruit in sectors which are important for the green industrial transition,” the confederation warned. 

Rather than implement the proposals outlined in the inquiry’s conclusions, it concluded, the government should instead begin work on a new national strategy for international recruitment. 

“Sweden instead needs a national strategy aimed at creating better conditions for Swedish businesses to be able to attract, recruit and retain international competence.”

SHOW COMMENTS