SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

SWEDEN ELECTS

Sweden Elects: Budget reforms, a paradigm shift and 26 seconds of silence

The Local's editor Emma Löfgren explains the key events to keep an eye on in Swedish politics this week.

Sweden Elects: Budget reforms, a paradigm shift and 26 seconds of silence
Elisabeth Svantesson, Sweden’s finance minister, along with Erik Slottner, Sweden’s new Minister for Public Administration and Niklas Wykman, new Minister for Financial Markets. Photo: Finance Ministry

Hej,

I’m writing this newsletter early in the morning. It’s still dark outside but I can see a thin strip of sunny orange on the horizon and it’s almost November.

Later next month, on November 8th to be specific, Sweden’s new government is expected to hand over its first budget bill to parliament.

Rumours have it that it will not contain some of the most far-reaching reforms of the Tidö Agreement, the deal between the three right-wing parties in government and the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats.

Those reforms are instead planned in time for next year’s budget, reports Swedish finance newspaper Dagens Industri, giving the parties more time to work out the finer details of the proposals that allowed Moderate party leader – and now Prime Minister – Ulf Kristersson to form his government.

We already know a little bit about what will be proposed in this year’s budget (3,000 pages, according to Expressen). As is usually the case, the parties have been releasing information in dribs and drabs to maximise the time that the Swedish media will spend reporting on their budget.

One of the proposals is a dedicated 6.7 billion kronor (approximately $612 million) to tax cuts on fuel, following up on election promises to lower petrol and diesel prices. This would mean a decrease of one krona per litre from the start of next year, according to the parties, although Swedish news agency TT reports the actual effect at the pump will be a decrease of 0.14 kronor per litre of petrol and 0.41 kronor per litre of diesel.

Last week the government also announced its plan for a so-called “high-cost protection” for those hit by high power prices. More on that HERE.

In other news, the government has also spent the past week cautiously warning that some of the ambitious pledges made before the election may take slightly longer to implement than voters may be expecting (the above-mentioned high-cost protection was supposed to have been introduced by November 1st, which is no longer a likely deadline). 

“It could get worse before it gets better,” said Kristersson in his first speech to parliament about his promise to crack down on gang crime, a line he repeated in the first parliamentary debate last week.

Social Democrat opposition leader (and former Prime Minister) Magdalena Andersson at a press conference attacked the government on missing the November 1st deadline on the high-cost protection for energy costs. “You shouldn’t make promises you can’t keep,” she told reporters.

But she was reluctant to offer any strong criticism of the government on its migration policies, when asked in an interview by the Expressen newspaper, instead suggesting they did not go far enough.

“There is absolutely no question that we need a strict set of migration laws,” she said, rejecting the claims of Sweden Democrat leader Jimmie Åkesson that the new programme represented a “paradigm shift”.

“The paradigm shift happened in 2015, and we carried it out,” she said, taking credit on behalf of the Social Democrat-led government at the time.

Has there been a paradigm shift? More than 500 readers responded to a recent survey by The Local, with over half saying they felt less welcome in Sweden than before the election. Many shared personal stories of racism or xenophobia they had faced since moving to Sweden. Read it HERE.

The Local carried out the survey after US tech worker Kat Zhou found herself in the eye of a storm after posting on Twitter about her experiences of racism. Our Sweden in Focus podcast spoke to her after her series of tweets went viral for both the right and the wrong reasons.

In the world of local Swedish politics, an interview with the deputy mayor of Norrtälje went viral (it even made Australian news!) after he was asked by an SVT reporter about the top councillors’ decision to raise their salaries by up to 27 percent… and was speechless for 26 seconds.

SVT lets the camera roll while awaiting his response, and in the end he answers “it’s a question of priorities”. You can watch the video here.

To be fair, after this election, 26 seconds of silence felt like a relief.

In Sölvesborg, the hometown of Jimmie Åkesson, the Sweden Democrats unexpectedly lost control of the municipality after their Moderate allies switched sides. Here’s The Local’s report in English.

In Gothenburg, a red-green coalition took power after the Social Democrats, Green Party and Left Party managed to oust the Moderates, despite failing to strike a coalition deal with the Centre Party.

And in Nynäshamn, a Sweden Democrat councillor resigned after being outed as a former propagandist for neo-Nazi site Nordfront. Anti-racist magazine Expo and Expressen found that she had used the racist N-word several times in posts, described gay pride celebrations as “disgusting” and called on women to live a “National Socialist life”.

Sweden Elects is a weekly column by Editor Emma Löfgren looking at the big talking points and issues after the Swedish election. Members of The Local Sweden can sign up to receive the column as a newsletter in their email inbox each week. Just click on this “newsletters” option or visit the menu bar.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

EDUCATION

Sweden’s Social Democrats call for ban on new free schools

Sweden's opposition Social Democrats have called for a total ban on the establishment of new profit-making free schools, in a sign the party may be toughening its policies on profit-making in the welfare sector.

Sweden's Social Democrats call for ban on new free schools

“We want the state to slam on the emergency brakes and bring in a ban on establishing [new schools],” the party’s leader, Magdalena Andersson, said at a press conference.

“We think the Swedish people should be making the decisions on the Swedish school system, and not big school corporations whose main driver is making a profit.” 

Almost a fifth of pupils in Sweden attend one of the country’s 3,900 primary and secondary “free schools”, first introduced in the country in the early 1990s. 

Even though three quarters of the schools are run by private companies on a for-profit basis, they are 100 percent state funded, with schools given money for each pupil. 

This system has come in for criticism in recent years, with profit-making schools blamed for increasing segregation, contributing to declining educational standards and for grade inflation. 

In the run-up to the 2022 election, Andersson called for a ban on the companies being able to distribute profits to their owners in the form of dividends, calling for all profits to be reinvested in the school system.  

READ ALSO: Sweden’s pioneering for-profit ‘free schools’ under fire 

Andersson said that the new ban on establishing free schools could be achieved by extending a law banning the establishment of religious free schools, brought in while they were in power, to cover all free schools. 

“It’s possible to use that legislation as a base and so develop this new law quite rapidly,” Andersson said, adding that this law would be the first step along the way to a total ban on profit-making schools in Sweden. 

SHOW COMMENTS