SHARE
COPY LINK

2022 SWEDISH ELECTION

‘Sweden was better than this’: Foreign residents respond to far-right breakthrough

A clear majority of respondents to The Local's Twitter poll said they were "worried" about the Sweden Democrats finally gaining real political power, with many fearing tougher residency and citizenship rules and a rise in racism, intolerance, and populism.

'Sweden was better than this': Foreign residents respond to far-right breakthrough
Jimmie Åkesson dances on stage to celebrate his party's election result on Sunday. Photo: Stefan Jerrevång/TT

The far-right party was the overwhelming victor in Sunday’s general election, gaining 11 new parliamentary seats and giving the four parties supporting Ulf Kristersson the three-seat advantage they need to topple the ruling Social Democrats after eight years in power. 

As many as 67 percent of the nearly 700 people who responded to the poll described themselves as “worried” about the prospect of the party gaining huge influence in Sweden’s parliament. 

Several said they were afraid it would now become even harder for foreigners both to move to Sweden and to move over their relatives and other loved ones. 

“Immigration and reunification is already difficult enough. With SD [The Sweden Democrats] it’s only going to get worse,” wrote Mark Smit, a Dutchman living in Småland.

Emma Anderson said she was worried that “stricter citizenship requirements” might prevent her husband from applying when he becomes eligible in 2024, while Catalina Martinez Ascencio, a psychologist studying at Lund University, complained that foreigners were already facing long waits for permits from the Migration Agency, with new rules coming “every year”.  

“Those non-Europeans have been dealing with uncertainty and the fact that their effort might not count in the end,” she said.

It was not just the practical hurdles that concerned The Local’s followers, but also the prospect that Sweden will now change, with several respondents fearing that the country would now follow the same populist trajectory they had seen in their home countries. 
“Racism, xenophobia, and Islamophobia is being normalized,” Smit said. “This is making Sweden a worse place to live. The Netherlands lifted the Cordon Sanitaire [a refusal from other parties to cooperate with the far-right]  in 2010 and it’s been downhill from there. I have not missed that rotten political environment for a second. Sweden was better than this.” 
“Look at what’s happened to the UK in its lurch to the right – fed by fake news and fear of ‘the other’,” said Paul Malyon, who lives between Sweden and the UK. “Sweden needs to avoid any of the risks posed by the right or it could end up broken too.” 
David Munro, a Brit living in Malmö, also warned of the risk of “potential Trumpification/Borisation”.
“The hardline immigration line and clear presence of racists in the party is very worrying,” he wrote. “SD’s attempts to clear out bigots seems to have been as successful as the integration projects they criticise.” 
Iain, whose full name is not available in his Twitter account, said he was worried that the Moderate, Liberal and Christian Democrats would end up enabling “far-right policies such as undermining of press freedom, the independent judiciary, and with it democracy itself.” 
“All three of them should be ashamed,” he wrote. 

A minority of respondents welcomed the party’s new influence, however, expressing hope that they would force Sweden’s new government to tackle problems caused by excessive immigration. 
“The reason education, health and law and order are failing is because resources were re-allocated to care for a million new residents,” said Steven Trusler, a retired British police officer living in Dalarna.
“There was no issue taking some but the government went too far and forgot their primary objective which is caring for its own citizens. The rise of SD was and continues to be inevitable whilst other political parties still fail to grasp the realities of what they did.”

Member comments

  1. Great to read the comments here, good to see my worry/disappointment is reflected by my fellow immigrants. It’s a really grim time, and there will be more worry over the next few months. I don’t think normal Swede’s realise just how hard it is to ‘make it’ here.

    Also, it amused me that the only person who voiced support of SD was an brit and an ex-cop. “You can take the man out of the UK police, but you can’t take the UK police out of the man” comes to mind.

  2. @Andreas; I don’t think labeling it differently would have changed the way you responded. It’s quite typical of people like you with far-right ideology. Look at the comments underneath this article on GP. Many are attacking the writer with nasty words just because she expressed her opinion about the dangers of SD. The free press and freedom of speech are your enemies.

    https://www.gp.se/kultur/kultur/under-valnatten-blev-vi-m%C3%B6rdarens-mamma-1.80979141

    Sweden was better, now it will get worse.

  3. In one of the articles written by the Local recently, the author came up with this stunningly naive remark : “ How did it come to this ? “
    It sounds very much by the bemused husband whose wife left him suddenly, fed up by the unaddressed issues of the marriage.

    The level of nativity / abused generosity on the part of Sweden is mind blowing. And from this came fear to speak out on politicians part. I also read many a political careers would have been shattered until recently if someone had ventured saying “ wait a minute here…..isn’t this wild immigration going a bit far ?”
    Denmark with a labour government has clearly shifted gears…..and guess what? The Danes want more of it.
    A bit easy to blame the SD when in truth generations of Swedish politicians should be blamed for not having addressed the issue.
    It was an art of wokism before it’s time.
    You just cannot migrate to a country only to keep your ways and live like in your home country…..only much better enjoying all the perks.
    Simple as that…….and this applies to all the countries who have integration issues in Europe…..shall I name them ?

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS IN SWEDEN

OPINION: Is Sweden complacent about social media influence of the radical-right?

With the think tank linked to the Sweden Democrats openly recruiting the next generation of far-right social media 'influencers', why is Sweden so complacent about moves to shift public opinion to the radical right, asks The Local's Nordic editor Richard Orange.

OPINION: Is Sweden complacent about social media influence of the radical-right?

The radical right in Sweden is at least open about what it’s trying to do.

The homepage of Oikos, the think tank set up by Mattias Karlsson, the former right-hand man of Jimmie Åkesson, leader of the Sweden Democrats, is currently recruiting the first 15 of “a new generation” of “conservative” online propagandists. 

The think tank – whose controlling foundation has been criticised for refusing to reveal the true origin of 5 million kronor in funding – this week launched its new Illustra Academy, which aims to train an army of young, far-right “creators” to help win over minds on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. 

Successful applicants, it promises, will get the chance “to meet leading actors in social media and digital political influencing”.

They will get “mentorship from established political influencers”, build “valuable contacts with influencers, digital opinion-makers, creatives, politicians and possible future employers”, and meet “businesses, political organisations, communications agencies and media actors”. 

This programme is being set up by Andreas Palmlöv, one of the many top Sweden Democrats who went to the US after Donald Trump was elected president to work for an increasingly radicalised Republican Party, serving as an intern for the former Speaker of Congress Kevin McCarthy.

After his return to Sweden, Palmlöv was photographed meeting Gregg Keller, a US lobbyist he says he met through the Leadership Institute, an organisation backed by a who’s who of US billionaire donors which has over the past ten years spent 8 million kronor training up young “conservatives” in Europe.

Karlsson, Åkesson’s former right-hand man, has even closer links to the US, holding at least one meeting with Steve Bannon, Trump’s former strategist, and attending the wedding of the pro-Trump US conservative media profile Candace Owens in 2019.   

As a British citizen, I’m perhaps overly sensitive about the influence of conservative, libertarian donors and their think tanks, and of the efforts to use social media to push public opinion towards the radical right. 

Vote Leave, which led the campaign for the UK to leave the European Union, started its life at 55 Tufton Street, the townhouse near the UK Parliament where the country’s most powerful “dark money” think tanks are based, while Matthew Elliot, its chief executive, was a Tufton Street veteran. 

Since the UK left the EU, the ruling Conservative Party has been increasingly captured by these think tanks and their wealthy backers.   

Ministers, former ministers and Conservative MPs now happily speak alongside radical right figures at lavish conferences like the National Conservatism UK conference part-funded by Christian pro-Trump US foundations, or the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference part-funded by Paul Marshall and Christopher Chandler, the two billionaires who are the most open and prominent funders of attempts to shift the UK to the radical, libertarian right. 

Conservative MPs and former ministers have over the past two years been paid a total of £600,000 (8 million kronor) to appear on GB News, the Fox News clone jointly owned by Marshall and Chandler.

The Legatum Institute, Chandler’s own think tank, pretty much dictated the UK’s Brexit policy while Boris Johnson was prime minister, while during Liz Truss’s brief premiership, the Tufton Street think tanks supplied much of her team.

When her attempt to drive through their radical libertarian economic programme blew up spectacularly, she was forced to resign. But they haven’t given up, with Truss returning in February with the new Popular Conservatism group. 

I had always believed that the UK politics was immune to US levels of big donor influence, that the Conservative Party could never go the way of the Republican Party in the US, and it turns out I was wrong. 

So is that same naivety playing out in Sweden? 

The Oikos think tank has already started hosting international conservative conferences along the lines of ARC, with a conference at the Sundbyholms Slott castle outside Eskilstuna last year. 

When Social Democrat opposition leader Magdalena Andersson raised questions earlier this year about the funding of Henrik Jönsson, a popular YouTube debater, she was sharply criticised by commentators of both left and right for seeking to smear a critic without providing evidence

But in the US, there are billionaire-funded ‘educational’ YouTube channels like PragerU that follow a very similar format to Jönsson’s. Jönsson’s videos reliably follow the same talking points, questioning whether global warming is really causing extreme weather, spread disinformation about wind farms, call for Sweden’s public broadcasters to be abolished, and claim migrants have trashed the economy. 

And when a donor last year asked Gunnar Strömmer, now Sweden’s Justice Minister, how to give 350,000 kronor to the Moderates without having to identify himself under party financing laws, in part of a sting by TV4’s Kalla Fakta programme, Strömmer advised him to give it directly to right-wing “opinion-makers”, meaning, presumably, people like Jönsson. 

Despite the uproar, Jönsson has never explicitly denied receiving funding from outside organisations, only that such funding does not influence his output. 

“I am quite open about the fact that I willingly take money from all decent organisations and private individuals,” he told the Dagens ETC newspaper, while declining to give any further details. “But no one controls what I say,” he added. 

He has admitted that the website for his Energiupproret campaign, which blamed green policy and the shutdown of nuclear power stations for high power prices in the run-up to the 2022 election, was built by Näringslivets Mediaservice, a right wing social media outfit the precise funding of which was always unclear, although it was linked to Stiftelsen Svenskt Näringsliv, a foundation set up partly by the Confederation of Swedish Industry. 

The founders of Oikos’ new influencer education programme would probably argue that nothing is stopping the political left and centre from raising funds to train up young social media influencers in exactly the same way. 

Left-wing parties are not above taking donations. Approached by the same donor as part of the Kalla Fakta undercover report, representatives of the centre-left Social Democrats – as well as the Christian Democrats, Liberals, and Sweden Democrats on the right – also recommended ways around party finance laws.

But do we really want the UK or Sweden to follow the path the US has taken in recent decades, where a handful of billionaires with radical right opinions have aggressively pumped money into think tanks and media outfits and so succeeded in pushing one of the main parties towards previously fringe political opinions? 

It didn’t need to be this way.

When Sweden was developing its new party financing laws back in 2016, experts warned the then government must not to allow the identity of donors to be hidden behind foundations, the key method used by so-called dark money in the US, but the loophole was left open by the law.

It’s not just Oikos, which is funded by an opaque foundation, Insamlingsstiftelsen för Svensk Konservatism (The Fundraising Foundation for Swedish Conservatism), which uses this loophole. 

When caught in the sting by the Kalla Fakta programme, a Social Democrat also suggested that the donor set up a foundation to hide their identity. 

It may be that money from US billionaires, big companies, or indeed from other states, is not yet being spent in Sweden in a way that can alter the political landscape, but because neither think tanks nor influencers need to give much information about who funds them, it’s impossible to know. 

In the UK, the danger may soon be averted. No one seems to take the new outfit fronted by Liz Truss too seriously, and the general election later this year should offer the chance to clean up the country’s politics.  

Nonetheless, I feel like I’ve come very close to losing my original homeland to the kind of political developments seen in the US. I don’t want to lose my adopted country too.

SHOW COMMENTS