SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

TECH

Fact check: Is Germany’s internet really that bad?

It's not uncommon to hear people complaining about slow downloads and patchy connections in the Bundesrepublik. But is the reality of using the internet Germany really as bad as people say it is?

A slug on a keyboard
A slug on a keyboard. Photo: Uwe Zucchi dpa/lhe

Germany’s never-ending quest to move into the 21st century is the punchline to a lot of jokes. For years on end, successive governments have promised to supercharge the country’s internet connections and build up online services – but digitalisation is a goal that never quite seems to be reached.

When The Local surveyed its readers about their biggest culture shocks in Germany, numerous people said they’d been dumbfounded by the country’s old-fashioned way of getting things done. 

“Bureaucracy, poor digitalisation, poor online services – I was expecting Germany to be much more efficient on the online services front,” one Italian reader told us. Others said they were shocked at how inefficient things were. 

READ ALSO:

But it’s arguably the speed of the internet that gets people the most riled up. This especially true since the pandemic, when people were reliant on a good connection to be able to work or study from home. 

In the latest move to improve digital access, the government passed a bill that enshrined the right to fast internet in law. But there are some serious questions about whether their definition of “fast” – a rather measly 10 Mbps – is really adequate for today’s internet users.

So, what’s the internet situation like at the moment and how is it affecting people’s lives? 

Here are some of the latest statistics and survey results on the state of connectivity in Germany. 

How bad is the internet in Germany? 

According to a YouGov survey carried out last year by Frankfurt internet hub DE-CIX, more than a third of people in Germany feel their lives are slowed down by unreliable internet.

The survey revealed that 38 percent of people experience noticeable delays in using the internet several times a week or even on a daily basis. Only eight percent of respondents said they never experience issues. 

Woman uses internet on phone

A woman uses the internet on her phone at home. Photo: picture alliance/dpa/dpa-tmn | Christin Klose

Somewhat surprisingly given the switch to remote working, respondents to the YouGov survey felt their internet had even got worse since the second year of the pandemic. In a comparable survey in 2021 only 33.5 percent of respondents reported problems – almost five percentage points less than the current figure.

Young adults and home office workers were the most likely to be impacted by a patchy service. But more than a third (34 percent) of over-55s nonetheless reported frequent internet connection problems.

Are there differences between rural and urban areas?

Interestingly, people in urban areas (cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants) were slightly more likely to complain about a poor internet connection than the population in rural areas (places with less than 20,000 inhabitants).

While 41 percent of people in big cities say that they experience delays in internet use daily or several times a week, just 38 percent of people in small German towns and rural areas say the same thing. In contrast, only 35 percent of residents of medium-sized towns (20,000 to 100,000 inhabitants) complain about poor network quality.

READ ALSO: ‘We’re running late on this’: Deutsche Bahn promises better Wifi on German trains by 2026

What kind of problems do people have?

Most often, respondents said they noticed problems at the end of the day when video or music streaming with services like Netflix, Spotify, YouTube are jerky and slow (35 percent).

Around a fifth (21 percent) experience speed issues when working from home, for example during video conferences, webinars or the use of cloud applications (21 percent). 

The issues weren’t restricted to activities that take up a lot of bandwidth, however. In fact, 18 percent of people said they experienced delays and other interruptions when trying to carry out everyday activities like online shopping or banking online. 

How does Germany’s internet compare to other countries? 

Looking at the latest statistics, the perception that Germany’s internet is slower than in other places doesn’t appear to be a figment of the imagination.

According to data accrued by speed-testing service Ookla, internet users in Germany experienced average speeds of 88 Mbps in 2023, putting the country in 55th place in the global rankings. 

Woman on smartphone

A young woman browses the internet on her smartphone. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Fabian Sommer

By way of comparison, people in neighbouring Switzerland can expect speeds of 187 Mbps at home, while people in France get 200 Mbps on average. That’s more than twice as high as the average German household. 

That said, there have been significant improvements compared to last year and the year before. In a similar survey in the early months of 2022, internet users in Germany achieved speeds of 51.03 Mbps while on their mobiles and 67.15 Mbps while on a fixed connection. 

100 Mpbs is generally considered a “fast” internet speed since it allows multiple users to connect to the same network with few delays. 

READ ALSO: More than half of Germans regularly experience bad mobile coverage

Why is the internet so bad in Germany?

The problems largely have to do with a lack of investment in the infrastructure that would enable faster internet speeds. 

Fibre optic cables enable the most impressive speeds of up to 2.5 Gbps, followed by cable internet (up to 1,000 Mbps) and, lastly, copper wires (up to 100 Mbps). For a long time, Germany kept one foot in the past, attempting to lay more fibre-optic cables but at the same time not really disincentivising copper either. And, as usually happens, progress in laying new cables has been reliant on both the whims of state governments and the support of telecoms giants like Vodafone and Telekom. 

In fact, the situation has got so bad that the Federal Network Agency has recently decided to sue the three major mobile providers – Vodafone, Telekom and O2 – for failing to meet their legal obligations in expanding the mobile network.

Munich city centre

A birds-eye view of Munich city centre. Munich has some of the best fibre-optic coverage in the country. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Felix Hörhager

The case relates specifically to 500 gaps in the 4G network where none of the providers are able to provide internet speeds of 100MB or more. The operators say they are covered by exceptions in areas where they are unable to erect new 4G masts, for example due to a lack of available land. However, the Network Agency claims that this  justification doesn’t apply in many cases – and that antennas could have been installed in certain regions after all. 

READ ALSO: Today in Germany: A roundup of the latest news on Monday

All of this has created a situation where internet speeds vary massively in different regions of the country. For example, a 2020 study by price comparison site Verifox found huge discrepancies in the prevalence of fibre optics across each of Germany’s major and medium-sized cities. 

According to Verifox, Cologne, Munich and Hamburg come out top with fibre-optic coverage of 80 percent, 75 percent and 72 percent respectively. On the other end of the spectrum were cities like Berlin, which, despite its reputation as a burgeoning tech hub, had just five percent fibre-optic coverage at the time. 

For a large number of respondents to YouGov’s survey, busy networks were seen as the most likely culprit for their internet woes. More than 40 percent said network congestion was the reason for delays, while 32 percent cited a bad network in their area and 19 percent said that their internet provider didn’t offer enough bandwidth. 

Just one in 10 respondents said their own technology – such as outdated laptops and smartphones – were to blame, and 12 percent thought the issue could lie with the streaming services themselves. 

READ ALSO: EXPLAINED: How Germany is trying to tackle its slow internet problem

What can people do about it? 

As a first port of call, experts advise consumers to try and resolve issues in their own networks. 

In large apartment buildings, for example, Wifi routers can interfere with each other’s radio signal. One remedy to this is to connect your PC or smart TV to the internet using an Ethernet cable. Internet users should also check that their router is not transmitting on an oversubscribed channel.

Popular routers such as the Fritzbox offer an “auto channel” feature that automatically searches for and connects to a suitable radio channel.

Fritzbox wifi router

A Fritzbox Wifi router. Photo: picture-alliance/ dpa | Uwe Zucchi

If none of this works, households could look into getting a discount on their monthly internet bill. Since December 2021, if internet speeds are permanently lower than advertised, consumers only have to pay for the speed they actually get from their providers.

With a speed test from the Federal Network Agency, you can check whether the internet connection delivers what the provider promises. But the test does unfortunately take a bit of time. In order to obtain a legally binding measurement protocol, you’ll need to take a total of 30 measurements on three different calendar days. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

SCHOOLS

What is Germany’s digital pact for schools and how does it affect pupils?

A key programme for digitalision in German schools expires on May 16th. Has the initiave been successful - and what comes next?

What is Germany's digital pact for schools and how does it affect pupils?

When it comes to digitalisation, Germany is a country very much under construction – and nowhere has that been more apparent than in schools. 

During the Covid-19 pandemic years, pupils suffered major setbacks as schools struggled to set up the infrastructure for remote and digital learning. 

This failure to set up digital learning quickly enough is seen as a key reason for Germany’s dismal performance in recent rankings of schools around the world.

Perhaps the most shocking of these came from a 2018 PISA study that ranked Germany 66th out of 78 countries in the availability of digital learning tools and 76th out 78 in the digital skills of teaching staff.

Desperate to turn things around, the federal and state governments launched their ‘Digital Pact for Schools’ back in 2019, earmarking a total of €6.5 billion for improving things like Wifi, the availability of digital equipment and administrative support.

Five years later – as the scheme expires – there are signs that the project has been a success. 

READ ALSO: German school pupils plummet to ‘lowest score ever’ in international rankings

How has the Digital Pact changed schools in Germany?

The €6.5 billion investment package consisted of €5 billion for boosting digital infrastructure in schools, €500 million for administrative support, €500 million for digital tools for teachers and a €500 emergency package for helping schools get set up for remote learning during the pandemic.

This was divided between the 16 federal states, with larger sums going to the states with the biggest populations and the highest number of schools. 

According to the Ministry of Education, around 90 percent of this sum has been either spent or earmarked since the fund was set up, with schools mostly using the money to purchase equipment like tablets and laptops for their classrooms. 

Out of the some 32,000 schools in Germany, around 29,000 benefited from the investment, the ministry revealed.

In the state of Bavaria alone, the Digital Pact helped fund 280,000 additional tablets in schools, bringing the total number up to 336,000. The number of digital classrooms, meanwhile, rose by 53,000 to 77,000 and the number of classrooms connected to wifi jumped by more than 60,000 to 101,000. 

Summing up the progress made in the last half decade, Stefan Düll, president of the German Teachers’ Association, said: “Most schools now have a good internet connection right up to the edge of the street,” even if no high-speed internet is available in the area. 

READ ALSO: School drop-outs rise across Germany as resources and teachers spread thin

According to the headteacher, there has also been significant steps forward in learning platforms, training for teachers and the availability of devices like tablets in schools. “Teaching can now utilise digital possibilities in many places,” he added. 

Is there still room for improvement?

Despite the investment, progress has been much slower in some regions and there are still many schools that don’t have access to wifi at all.

Düll also pointed out that, for schools to maintain high standards, there needs to be continuous investment for renewing subscriptions and replacing outdated or broken devices. This hasn’t always been forthcoming, he said. 

In addition, teachers often lack the administrative support they need to ensure that a digital lesson actually takes place in the case of technical problems. When it comes to training courses to get set up for digital learning, teachers are often unable to find the time while working more than 40 hours per week and coping with ever-worsening staff shortages.

School pupil in Germany

A school pupil studies history on a laptop at school in Germany. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Marijan Murat

Finally, Düll sees room for improvement in the government’s attitude towards artificial intelligence (AI) and finding safe and ethical ways to incorporate it in the classroom.

“AI has an incredible amount of potential, an incredible amount of opportunities for our country as a whole, for Germany as a business location,” he said, “and Germany still has the chance to be at the forefront.”

However, since the current Digital Pact only mentions AI in passing, schools currently have to shell out for this themselves – and licensing software with high data protection standards doesn’t come cheap. 

Will there be a Digital Pact 2.0? 

There should be, but currently it’s unclear what form it will take or how it will be financed. 

Though the new pact is due to kick off in 2025, Education Minister Bettina Stark-Watzinger (FDP) is currently locked in a battle with the state culture ministers over where the money for the next investment programme should come from.

Previously, 90 percent of the funding came from the federal government, while just ten percent was put forward by the states. This time around, however, Stark-Watzinger is demanding a 50/50 split and also wants more say in how the programme should work.

One key sticking point is the amount of funding put into additional training for teachers. “The Digital Pact 2.0 must not become a mere order list for digital devices,” the FDP politician said recently. “Teachers are central to good digital education and need appropriate further training.”

Education Minister Bettina Stark-Watzinger (FDP) in Berlin

Education Minister Bettina Stark-Watzinger (FDP) in Berlin. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Christophe Gateau

From the Education Ministry’s perspective, the next Digital Pact should expire in 2030 and function as the last major investment from central government. 

However, the states disagree on almost every front.

Not only would state education ministers like to see the 90/10 funding continue, but they also reject the idea of the federal government interfering on what the money should be used for. That’s largely because, under Germany’s federal system, states are primarily responsible for governing schools and education. 

In addition, the Länder reject the idea of an end date and would like to see the investment continue indefinitely.

READ ALSO: Six surprising facts about Germany’s school system

It’s still unclear when the next Digital Pact may be finalised. Relations between Stark-Watzinger and the state culture ministers have soured to such an extent that the FDP politician refused an invite to the next Culture Ministers’ Conference (CMK) that’s due be held in Saarland this June.

That means the deadlock is likely to continue into the foreseeable future. 

SHOW COMMENTS